Why do many girls especially dislike male novels?

Many first-person novels lack empathy and immersion because the female or male protagonists in the novel usually can't really experience their emotions and experiences. This style of writing is often called "first-person tragedy" because it often reveals the loneliness, helplessness, and loss of the protagonist. In addition, first-person novels often limit the development of the story because the author can't imagine and design the plot like others. This limitation might cause problems in the logic and cohesiveness of the story, affecting the reader's understanding and experience of the story. Although first-person novels can sometimes grab readers 'attention, it's not always a popular way of writing. The readers prefer novels with depth, a compact plot, and logic to novels that simply describe their emotions and experiences.

First-person writing usually makes the reader feel like the author is experiencing the plot and characters in the story. This sense of immersion can be frustrating and uncomfortable. This is because in first-person writing, readers tend to focus on the author rather than the characters and plot in the story. This sense of immersion might cause the reader to feel depressed and lonely, lacking empathy and understanding. First-person writing can also leave readers feeling that it lacks depth and cohesiveness. Because the author's own feelings and thoughts are often directly conveyed to the reader, it may cause the story to lack depth and logic. As a result, the reader might feel that the story is not compact and lacks tension, making it difficult to keep up with the development of the plot. First-person writing could also affect the story's legibility and appeal. As readers tend to focus on the author, they may miss other characters and plots in the story, which will affect the attractiveness and legibility of the story. Therefore, many readers prefer to write in the third person to better understand and immerse themselves in the characters and plot of the story, and at the same time, to better maintain the cohesiveness and depth of the story.

First-person novels usually made the readers feel that the author's emotions and experiences were directly reflected on the paper, and the readers were more likely to resonate with them. However, this method would also make the novel less objective and rigorous, making the story more chaotic and vague. In addition, for some readers, the first person may make reading more difficult because they need to understand the author's emotions and experiences themselves. However, for some excellent novels, using the first person could still produce good results, such as "Dream of the Red Chamber","Romance of the Three Kingdoms", etc. These novels were excellent in expressing the emotions and plots of the characters and had very high literary value. The use of first-person novels has its unique advantages and disadvantages. Different readers may have different preferences and opinions. For the creation of novels, the author could try different ways to express the story and find the most suitable way of narration for his work.

Girls might not like graphic novels with overly violent or gory content. It can be too disturbing for them.

Some people might think they're too cheesy or predictable. Not everyone enjoys the typical love story tropes.

I'm not a fan of 'Pride and Prejudice'. The language feels overly formal and the story seems a bit predictable to me. Also, I find the characters' social conventions restrictive and a bit tiresome.

First-person novels usually presented the perspective of the author or the protagonist, and the readers often couldn't really integrate into the story, so they would feel a lack of immersion. In addition, the first-person writing style may also make the story too autobiographical and lack fiction and imagination, thus reducing the attractiveness of the novel.

Chicken soup novels usually focused on positive topics and comments in an attempt to motivate readers to strive and work hard to make people believe that they could do anything. However, such articles tend to ignore the reality and exaggerate the possibility of success and happiness. They often lack substantial content and action guidance, so it is easy for people to have unrealistic fantasies and feelings of loss. Poisonous chicken soup novels, on the other hand, usually focused on negative and pessimistic topics and comments in an attempt to achieve a certain goal by destroying the reader's confidence and enthusiasm. Such articles often used extreme and exaggerated words to ignore reality and possibilities, and even involved some anti-intellectual and harmful information. Therefore, it was easy to cause negative and depressed emotions and even have a negative impact on reality. Therefore, although toxic chicken soup novels might make people uncomfortable and disgusted, in contrast, the positive and unrealistic remarks of chicken soup novels were more likely to cause negative effects and unrealistic expectations, so it was easier for people to like and dislike them.

It might be because the chemistry between the characters in the ship is lacking. Maybe the storylines involving them are not engaging or seem forced.

Maybe it's because the themes or storylines don't resonate with you. Or perhaps the characters don't seem relatable.