The negative side of pop songs was greater than the positive side. This is our school's debate competition. We need to debate the views. Everyone should be more enthusiastic and get extra points.

The theme of this debate was about the importance of doing and talking. The positive side believed that doing was more important than talking, while the negative side believed that talking was more important than doing. Affirmative point of view: actions are more important than words. Because doing was a practical action that could bring direct and practical benefits. When we make a decision or action, we are actually responsible for it and trying to achieve it. Only when we put our ideas and beliefs into action can we prove that they are correct. In contrast, verbal expressions could not bring about actual changes. Opposite point of view: Saying is more important than doing. This was because it allowed people to express their thoughts and opinions, thereby arousing the resonance and support of others. By speaking, we can pass on information and knowledge to help others better understand our views and beliefs. In addition, it can also bring certain social benefits, allowing us to establish connections and interactions with others. The outcome of this debate depended on the opinions and arguments of both parties. In the end, it had to be judged based on facts and logic. Both sides needed to provide sufficient evidence and reasons to convince the audience.

The conclusion of the opposing side of the online pros and cons debate: The advantages of the network: 1. Ease: The Internet makes information transmission faster and more convenient. People can obtain information from any part of the world in a few seconds. 2. Freedom: The Internet is a free space where people can freely express their thoughts and opinions on the Internet without restrictions. Sharing: The Internet allows people to share their knowledge and experience, making knowledge more universal and shared. 4. Creation: The Internet provides more opportunities for people to create and start businesses. People can achieve more innovation and inventions through the Internet. Weakness of the Internet: Fake: The authenticity and credibility of online information are questioned. Some information may be processed and processed to lack authenticity. 2. Misleading: Information on the Internet spreads very quickly. Some information may be mistransmitted and misinterpreted to mislead people's judgments and decisions. 3. Invasion of privacy: The spread of online information may invade people's privacy and expose people's personal information. 4. Addiction: Overuse of the Internet may cause people to be addicted to the online world and affect their physical and mental health. To sum up, the network has many advantages and disadvantages. When using the network, we need to rationally view its advantages and disadvantages, make full use of its advantages and avoid its disadvantages, so as to better use the network to bring more value to our society and individuals.

The ability to create works of art is more important. The positive side is the inspiration for the creation of works of art is more important. We are the negative side. We can refer to the following arguments that the negative side debater might make: 1. Creation inspiration can be crammed up at the last minute, but creation ability is the result of long-term accumulation. If you only have creative inspiration but no creative ability, then the work may lack depth and content. It's just simple plagiarism or imitation. If one only had the ability to create without inspiration, they might fall into the quagmire of plagiarism or imitation. Therefore, creative ability was more important than inspiration. 2. The ability to create can be cultivated, but inspiration can come from accumulation. If we can continue to learn, think and practice, we can cultivate our own creative ability. However, if one only had creative inspiration and no creative ability, they might lack creativity and competitiveness, making it difficult for them to stand out in the art market. Therefore, creative ability was more important than inspiration. 3. The creative ability can be measured, but the creative inspiration cannot. We can evaluate the creative ability of a work of art in various ways, such as evaluating its technique, content, style, and so on. And if we only have inspiration, we can't measure the value of a work by the same standard. Therefore, creative ability was more important than inspiration. 4. The ability to create can affect the value of a work of art, while inspiration can determine the direction and style of the work. An artist with creative ability might show different styles and characteristics in different works. However, if one only had creative inspiration, they might fall into a single creative style and it would be difficult to produce unique artistic value. Therefore, creative ability was more important than inspiration. These arguments can be used as the opposing debater's point of view in the debate, but it should be noted that the debate is not only a simple statement of the point of view, but also through logic, evidence and examples to support their point of view in order to win the game.

As the opposing side, whether the advantages or disadvantages of middle school students surfing the internet are greater than the advantages or disadvantages, you can refer to the following questions and answers: 1. The internet can help students study better. You can search and read all kinds of materials to enhance your learning and understanding and improve your academic performance. 2. Surfing the Internet can also help students develop their interests. You can explore all kinds of new things and websites to broaden your horizons and cultivate your own interests and hobbies. 3. The internet can also provide social opportunities for students. You can communicate with your classmates and family, expand your social circle, and understand different perspectives and cultures. 4. Surfing the Internet may also lead to the influence of bad information. They may be misled by false information on websites and social media, resulting in misunderstandings and harm. Surfing the Internet may also affect the health of students. Sitting in front of the computer for a long time may cause eye fatigue, cervical vertebra disease, and other problems. The affirmative side can ask the following questions: 1. Does the Internet have a negative impact on the growth and learning of middle school students? Will surfing the Internet affect the social and mental health of middle school students? 3. Does surfing the Internet have a negative impact on the health of middle school students? How should middle school students control their online time to avoid being negatively affected? Answer: As a fan of online literature, I can provide some useful thoughts and opinions. However, both sides of the debate should conduct in-depth discussions and debates based on their own actual situation and arguments to reach a conclusion that they think is correct.

As a positive, you can consider asking the following questions to question the negative: 1 What is "our youth is our own decision"? In this sentence, who should make this decision? What did this decision mean? If youth needs to make decisions, what should these decisions be like? Does it include immoral or inappropriate decisions? If a person can't make his own decision, then is there any meaning to his youth? Are there enough resources for everyone to make their own decisions? If so, where did these resources come from? If not, then why? Should a person be blamed or punished if he cannot make his own decisions? If so, was this accusation or punishment reasonable? 6. Do those who make their own decisions receive the respect and support they deserve? If so, why? If not, then why? Is there enough education and social training to help people make the right decisions? If so, where was the training conducted? If not, then why? If a person's youth is limited or deprived, does he still have the right to pursue his dreams and goals? If so, why? If not, then why? These questions can help you better understand the opposing side's point of view and arguments in order to better debate.

First of all, we need to make it clear that the purpose of the debate is not to refute the other party's point of view, but to convince the other party to accept our point of view. Therefore, before refuting the other party's point of view, we need to think about how to better express our point of view. If the other party thinks that jokes do more harm than good to the spread of history, we can refute it from the following aspects: Jokes could allow people to understand history more deeply. Joking not only allowed people to understand the background and details of historical events, but also allowed people to understand the views and attitudes of different figures in historical events, so as to better understand the evolution of historical figures and historical events. Joking could improve people's cultural quality. History is an important part of culture, and jokes can be used as an interesting form of cultural expression to let people better understand and understand history and culture. Jokes could enrich people's entertainment life. Although historical events were important, they were often boring. Joking could be used as a form of entertainment to let people understand historical events in a relaxed atmosphere and improve their quality of life. To sum up, we can come to the conclusion that although the joke may bring some negative effects, it plays an important role in the popularity of history. It can make people have a deeper understanding of history, improve cultural quality and enrich their entertainment life. Therefore, I think the joke has more disadvantages than advantages for the popularity of history.

Positive descriptions, side descriptions, and negative contrast were all commonly used in literature to let the readers better understand and feel the plot, characters, and scenes in the work. Positive descriptions referred to the direct description of the positive characters in the novel, such as the character's personality, appearance, behavior, and inner feelings, in order to attract the reader's attention and resonate with them. Positive descriptions often use vivid, vivid, and specific language and description techniques to let the readers feel the author's deep insight and description of the characters, as well as the characters 'personalities and characteristics. Side descriptions were used to describe the secondary objects in the work to set off the positive objects, such as the relationship between the characters, the background of the environment, the foreshadowing of the plot, etc., in order to enhance the twists and turns of the plot. Side descriptions often used rich and complicated descriptions and rhetoric to let the readers feel the rich information and details in the works, as well as the ups and downs of the plot. Negative contrast refers to the description of the negative object in the work to highlight the value and significance of the positive object, such as the flaws, weaknesses, and crimes of the characters. Negative contrast often used strong and powerful description techniques and rhetoric to let the readers feel the shock and impact of the work and feel the fragility and tenacity of the characters. Positive descriptions, side descriptions, and negative contrast were commonly used in literature to allow readers to better understand and feel the plot, characters, and scenes in the work, enhancing the artistic appeal and expressiveness of the work.

The affirmative side could debate around the following points: Contribution and return are closely related: there is a close relationship between contribution and return. Only by giving first can you expect to get a return. Whether it was in work, study, or personal life, we all need to put in effort and sweat before we can reap results and rewards. Therefore, in the debate, it can be emphasized that effort and reward are related. Only by putting in enough effort can you get the corresponding reward. The returns are usually visible: the returns between effort and return are usually visible. When we put in effort, we usually see the corresponding results and gains. For example, when we put in enough effort in work or study, we usually get rewards such as improvement and harvest. Therefore, it can be emphasized in the debate that the reward is usually visible, and only by putting in enough effort can you see the corresponding reward. 3. Contribution and return are proportional: Contribution and return are proportional. Our efforts and returns are usually proportional. Only by putting in enough effort can we get the corresponding returns. For example, when we put in enough effort at work, we usually get a higher position, better salary, and other rewards. Therefore, in the debate, it can be emphasized that effort and return are proportional. Only by putting in enough effort can you get the corresponding return. Success requires constant effort: the relationship between effort and return is constantly accumulating and sublimating. Only by constantly putting in effort could one continuously reap rewards. Success is not something that can be achieved overnight. It requires constant perseverance and hard work. Therefore, it can be emphasized in the debate that success requires constant effort. Only by putting in enough effort can you achieve continuous success. The above are some points that the positive side can revolve around. They can be freely developed and supplemented according to the specific situation and topic of the debate.

Definitely. On the positive side, reading romance novels can enhance empathy. As you read about the characters' emotions and experiences, you become more understanding of others' feelings. It can also stimulate creativity. But the negative side effects include the potential for excessive daydreaming. You might find yourself constantly in a fictional world in your head, which can be a problem when you need to focus on real - life tasks.

In the second round of the debate, the opposing side had to answer the other side's questions before asking their own questions, which usually depended on the rules of the competition and the requirements of the judges. In some competitions, the judges may ask the opposing side to answer the other side's questions first before asking their own questions. The purpose of this was to allow the opposing side to better display their position and point of view, and at the same time, help the judges better understand the opposing side's point of view. In other competitions, the judges may allow the opposing side to ask their own questions without asking the other side to answer first. Doing so would allow the opposing side to express their views better and also prevent the judges from misunderstanding the opposing side's views. Whether or not he had to answer the other party's question before asking his own question depended on the rules of the competition and the requirements of the judges. In any case, the opposing side should try their best to show their position and point of view and ensure that their point of view is fully understood by the judges.