webnovel
Would writing the same chapter after a novel was banned be considered plagiarism?

Would writing the same chapter after a novel was banned be considered plagiarism?

2025-02-28 19:15
"I've written some online novels in Yuewen, but I'm not satisfied. The plot arrangement and other things make me feel uncomfortable, so I deleted the article and prepared to rewrite the story from a new perspective. Then, it was blocked normally. Then, in the parts that I rewrote later, are there any places and plots that will be labeled as plagiarism like this blocked book? (I have contacted the administrator to completely block the original version.) But the administrator didn't tell me if it was considered plagiarism = =)
1 answer

Writing the same chapter after the novel was banned might be considered plagiarism. In law, plagiarism referred to the act of copying, adapting, adapting, or using another person's work without authorization to obtain copyright income. If the same plot, characters, and theme appeared multiple times in the same novel without the authorization of the original author, it might be judged as plagiarism. If the novel is banned and the same chapter is published again, it may be regarded as plagiarism of the original work. This may cause the original author to file a complaint to the platform and may ban his account or work. Therefore, when writing a novel, it was recommended to avoid plagiarism and respect the original.

After Transmigrating, the Fat Wife Made a Comeback!

After Transmigrating, the Fat Wife Made a Comeback!

Qiao Mei transmigrated into a novel as a supporting character with the same name as her who lacked presence. This supporting character was a country bumpkin who couldn’t get married due to her obesity. According to the original script, this country girl Qiao Mei was a fatty spoiled by her grandfather. However, their relatives were all vicious and cruel people. Her grandfather had poor health, so once he died, the relatives would divide and swallow up his assets. Hence, her grandfather’s greatest wish was to marry Qiao Mei off. For this, even sacrificed and betrayed his good friend’s grandson, Xia Zhe. Grandpa got Xia Zhe drunk and had Qiao Mei forcibly take the strong and handsome Xia Zhe with her body which weighed more than two hundred pounds. Then, grandpa would catch them the next day and force Xia Zhe to marry Qiao Mei. However, that eventually caused the start of Qiao Mei’s unfortunate life. Also, in the original story, Qiao Mei took possession of Xia Zhe’s mysterious jade. But due to Qiao Mei’s stupidity, her cousin's sister had tricked Qiao Mei into giving her the jade, which resulted in the cousin’s family becoming rich. When Qiao Mei transmigrated here, it was during the awkward moment when she was making love to the man after making him drunk. She woke up groggily the next day and grandpa’s team had already appeared at the door. Qiao Mei was frightened. She didn’t want to proceed on the original path and marry a man who didn’t love her. And so, she lied and chased grandpa away. She also pushed the man out before forcing herself to look at her tanned and chubby reflection in the mirror! Alas, she cried at her ugly appearance… Like a sumo wrestler in large cloth underwear, even the plus-sized apparel shops didn’t have clothes in her size. And her face was the size of a pizza, a scorched pizza! Qiao Mei decided to reform her life! The first step, lose weight! The second step, clean up her room! She used to be particular about cleanliness, and although her current house had a huge courtyard, she could only describe it as messy! The third step was to hold onto the jade tightly so her greedy cousin wouldn’t stand a chance! Only, wasn’t the tall and handsome Xia Zhe supposed to hate her according to the original story? Why was he being nicer and nicer to her?
Urban
2450 Chs

Writing novels in the same format, was that considered plagiarism?

Writing novels in the same format was not considered plagiarism. plagiarism refers to the act of directly or indirectly copying other people's works, thoughts, opinions, and creativity without authorization, which is a legal violation. The format of a novel could be fixed or flexible. As long as the author had a breakthrough and innovation in creativity and conception, it would not constitute plagiarism. In addition, if the format of the novel was similar to other works, but the plot, characters, background, and other elements had unique personalities and characteristics, it could still be regarded as a manifestation of innovation and uniqueness. Therefore, writing novels in the same format did not necessarily mean plagiarism. The key was whether there was a breakthrough and innovation in creativity and conception.

1 answer
2025-03-03 15:55

Writing a novel using the same method as others, was that considered plagiarism?

Was it plagiarism to write a novel using a similar routine to others? Fictional plagiarism refers to plagiarizing other people's works, story plots, characters, language expressions, etc. in the process of creation, directly or indirectly plagiarizing other people's achievements and using them in one's own works. If you use a similar or identical storyline or character setting when writing a novel, it might be a form of plagiarism. However, this did not necessarily mean that it was plagiarism, because some similarities could be inspired or based on the analysis and understanding of existing works. To determine whether or not plagiarism was done, one needed to consider a number of factors, such as similarity, source of creativity, intellectual property rights, and so on. If you're sure that you're using someone else's work or routine, you should quote or explain it in an appropriate place to avoid misunderstanding or confusion. When writing a novel, one should pay attention to the original and uniqueness, avoid copying other people's works, and protect one's own creative rights.

1 answer
2024-09-04 21:49

Writing a novel using the same method as others, was that considered plagiarism?

Was it considered plagiarism to write a novel using the same routine as others? In the eyes of the law, plagiarism refers to copying someone else's work, creativity, or structure, or using someone else's work or structure without permission. If the novel used the same method as others without the author's permission or source, it could be considered plagiarism. However, plagiarism is not an absolute problem because in some cases, similar stories or structures may be considered a "tribute" rather than plagiarism. However, if the similarity was very high or the storyline and structure were completely copied from someone else's work, then this behavior might be considered plagiarism. If you plan to write a novel, it's best to make sure that your actions are legal and avoid copying other people's works or structures. If you're not sure if your actions are legal, you can consider consulting a lawyer.

1 answer
2024-08-17 20:22

The novel had the same name. Was it considered plagiarism?

A novel with the same name was not necessarily plagiarized because plagiarism usually referred to the plot, characters, locations, and other elements of the work being similar or even directly copying the content of another person's work. And the fact that the names of the novels were not the same could be due to the author's reference or influence from other works. The legal definition of plagiarism was " the act of copying, distributing, renting, exhibiting, performing, screening, broadcasting, and information network transmission without the permission of the copyright owner." If the novel has the same name but is not similar and does not copy the content of another person's work, it may not be considered plagiarism. However, if the title of the novel was similar or even directly copied from someone else's work, it might be considered plagiarism. Therefore, authors should try to avoid plagiarism and respect the original when writing novels to avoid unnecessary trouble for the copyright owner.

1 answer
2024-09-23 10:20

Could it be considered plagiarism if the setting of the novel was the same?

The same setting of the novel could not be considered plagiarism because the setting of the novel itself was not original in the legal sense. The setting of a novel was usually some plot, scene, or character setting that the author randomly thought of during the creation process. They were not independent or innovative. However, if the background of two novels was similar, but there were big differences in the storyline, character personality, plot development, etc., there might be plagiarism. This was because the author might use similar plots, scenes, or character settings for multiple works according to their own imagination and ideas, resulting in plagiarism. Therefore, if the settings of two novels were the same but there were large differences in the storyline, character personality, plot development, and so on, there might be plagiarism. However, in this case, a concrete analysis was needed. They could not simply use the same setting as the standard for plagiarism.

1 answer
2024-08-30 00:18

Was writing a novel like this considered plagiarism?

As a fan of online literature, I need more information about the question you raised before I can answer your question. Please provide more context and details so that I can better understand your question and provide an accurate answer.

1 answer
2024-09-15 03:33

Was writing a mutant novel considered plagiarism?

Writing mutant novels was not considered plagiarism because creativity was one of the most important elements of a novel. Mutant novels could explore new topics and plots to bring new experiences to readers. However, if the mutated human elements in the novel were very similar to other works or existing storylines, or if the plot, characters, and background were completely derived from other works or existing storylines, then it might be considered plagiarism. In the process of writing, you must pay attention to maintaining the original and avoid copying other people's works. If you're not sure if it's plagiarism, you can ask a professional to evaluate and judge.

1 answer
2024-09-11 13:59

Was writing a novel like this considered plagiarism?

As a fan of online literature, I don't make legal judgments or comments on specific creative acts. But generally speaking, plagiarism referred to the act of directly copying or applying another person's work, creativity, or plot without authorization and using one's own language to reexpress it. Such behavior may be considered as violating the copyright and intellectual property rights of the original author and may lead to legal consequences. Therefore, when writing a novel, one should pay attention to avoid plagiarism, respect the original, and give full play to one's creativity and imagination.

1 answer
2025-03-05 09:54

Was copying a chapter from a novel considered plagiarism?

If the content of the chapter was similar to that of another novel, it could be considered plagiarism. plagiarism refers to the act of borrowing or copying content from another work without authorization and using it as one's own original work. In a novel, plagiarism was a very serious crime. It could cause the author to lose the copyright or even be sued. Therefore, if a novelist plagiarized the content of another work, he had to deal with the problem very carefully to avoid legal consequences.

1 answer
2025-03-09 02:17
a
b
c
d
e
f
g
h
i
j
k
l
m
n
o
p
q
r
s
t
u
v
w
x
y
z