What was so bad about the movie 'The Climber'?

The movie " The Climber " was based on Li Rengang's novel of the same name. It told the story of the Chinese mountaineering team climbing Mount Everest in the early 1960s. The film was highly praised by the audience after it was released in 2019 and was called a classic of Chinese mountaineering movies. The movie 'The Climber' had excellent plot and visual effects. Through real historical events and precious materials, the film showed the feat of Chinese mountaineers who overcame many difficulties in difficult environments and finally succeeded in climbing Mount Everest. At the same time, the film also showed the development of Chinese mountaineering and the mountaineering culture with Chinese characteristics, so that the audience had a deeper understanding of Chinese culture. The movie 'The Climber' also performed well in terms of actors. Wu Jing, Li Rengang, Zhang Ziyi, Zhou Yong and other actors 'outstanding performances let the audience see their true side and also showed their tenacity and courage in the face of difficulties and challenges. Overall, the movie " The Climber " was worth watching. It not only showed the history and culture of Chinese mountaineering, but also gave the audience a deeper understanding of China's strength and national spirit.

" The Climber " was a movie directed by Li Rengang, Wu Jing, Zhang Ziyi, Hong Kong directors Li Rengang, Hu Ge, and others. The film tells the story of the difficulties and challenges faced by Chinese mountaineers in the process of climbing Mount Everest. This movie was a great achievement in terms of film production. It showed the fighting spirit and perseverance of the Chinese mountaineers, and portrayed their tenacity and courage in the face of difficulties and setbacks. In addition, the film also showed China's status and achievements in the world of mountaineering by showing the history and current situation of Chinese mountaineering. 'The Climber' was an excellent film with high artistic value and historical significance. It not only presented the audience with a film full of patriotic spirit and teamwork, but also gave the audience an in-depth understanding of the development process and current situation of Chinese mountaineering.

" Left Ear " was a movie adapted from a cliché novel. Although it had the shell of a youth movie, its content was very mediocre and could even be said to be cliché. There were many problems in the plot, characters, and scenes of the movie. The most important problem was the lack of depth. The plot of the movie lacked logic, the actions and motives of the characters were difficult to understand, and there was a lack of cohesion. At the same time, there were also shortcomings in the movie's character creation. The character's personality and growth process were too simplistic, lacking depth and complexity. In addition, there were also problems with the setting of the movie. Some scenes were too monotonous and lacked creativity and imagination. In summary, Left Ear had many problems in terms of plot, characters, and scenes, which led to it being regarded as a bad film.

The movie " The Climber " was adapted from a true story. It told the story of Chinese mountaineers Li Na, Wang Junfeng, and others climbing Mount Everest. The movie portrayed this historical event to show the courage and perseverance of humans in challenging the peak, and also reflected the development of China's mountaineering industry.

Sorry, as a fan of online novels, I don't give subjective comments on movies. The movie's ratings and reputation varied from person to person. Some people might think it was good, while others might think it was bad. Different people's perception of a movie would be affected by various factors such as the plot, characters, photography, music, and so on. If you have any specific questions or doubts about this movie, please let me know. I will try my best to provide you with relevant information.

Not Hu Ge was not the lead actor of 'The Climber'. The movie's main actors included Wu Jing, Li Zhiting, Qu Chuxiao, and Li Qin.

The bad reviews of "The Climber" before it was released might include the following aspects: 1. The quality of the movie was not good. Some negative reviewers felt that the quality of the movie was not as good as expected and that it might lack some important elements such as special effects, plot, and character description. 2. Climbing is not suitable for the general public: Some people may think that climbing is too professional and high-end for the general audience to understand and accept. 3. The actor's performance is not good enough: Some bad reviewers may think that the actors in the movie are not good enough to fully express the characters and plot in the movie. 4. Commercial failure: Some bad reviewers believe that the film's poor box office performance may reflect the film's commercial failure. 5. Politically sensitive issues: Some negative reviewers felt that the film's sensitive political issues were not properly handled and could cause controversy and dissatisfaction. It should be noted that these are only some possible reasons. The specific reasons may vary from person to person.

The main reasons why the reviews of the newly released " Climber " were divided were as follows: 1. The quality of the film itself was excellent. " The Climber " was a historical film directed by the Chinese director Li Shaohong, adapted from the real event " Climbing Li Na." The production level of the film was high, the special effects were exquisite, and the cast was very strong. Especially Wu Jing and Zhang Ziyi's acting skills were well received. 2. The audience's acceptance of historical topics was different. Due to the different reputation and acceptance of historical films among the audience, there was a certain degree of division among the audience of 'The Climber'. Some audiences had higher expectations for historical films, believing that the film should conform to historical facts and respect history, while others might prefer fictional films. 3. The plot and theme of the movie were more complicated and required a certain amount of understanding and thinking. The Climber tells the story of Chinese mountaineers climbing Mount Everest in the 1960s. The theme involves national honor, personal sacrifice and teamwork. For audiences of different ages and cultural backgrounds, the plot and theme of the film may require a certain amount of understanding and thinking to fully understand. All of the above reasons led to a situation where the evaluation of " The Climber " was divided into two. However, the quality and production level of the film were high. For those who liked historical topics and wanted to watch high-quality movies, it was worth watching.

There are many possible answers to this question. Here are some of the possible reasons: Filmmaking was very different from novel creation. A movie needed to present a lot of information in a short period of time and maintain a tight rhythm and plot development. Fictions usually paid more attention to the plot and character development. It took more time to describe the background and details. These differences may lead to differences in the way the film and the novel are expressed and the rhythm, resulting in differences between the adaptation and the original. 2. The adaptation of the movie required rethinking the storyline and characters to meet the requirements of the movie production. This might destroy the original structure and plot of the novel, making it difficult for the adaptation to be consistent with the original. The film adaptation also needed to consider how to bring the elements from the novel onto the screen, such as how to transform the world view, setting, and character image of the novel into the scenes and characters in the movie. All of these would need to be readjusted and designed, which could lead to differences between the adapted work and the original work. The movie adaptation also needed to consider how to bring the characters in the novel to the screen and how to express the emotions and theme in the novel. This might affect the plot and character creation in the movie, as well as the theme and emotions in the movie. Adaptations may require cuts, adjustments, or additional plots to better convey the theme and emotions of the film. These adjustments might cause the adaptation to be different from the original. A novel and a movie were two different art forms. Many factors needed to be taken into account in adapting a work, including the storyline, the character image, the setting of the world, the theme, and the emotions. Therefore, the quality of the adapted works was often not necessarily proportional to the quality of the original works, which was one of the reasons why there were differences between movies and novels.