The bad reviews of "The Climber" before it was released might include the following aspects: 1. The quality of the movie was not good. Some negative reviewers felt that the quality of the movie was not as good as expected and that it might lack some important elements such as special effects, plot, and character description. 2. Climbing is not suitable for the general public: Some people may think that climbing is too professional and high-end for the general audience to understand and accept. 3. The actor's performance is not good enough: Some bad reviewers may think that the actors in the movie are not good enough to fully express the characters and plot in the movie. 4. Commercial failure: Some bad reviewers believe that the film's poor box office performance may reflect the film's commercial failure. 5. Politically sensitive issues: Some negative reviewers felt that the film's sensitive political issues were not properly handled and could cause controversy and dissatisfaction. It should be noted that these are only some possible reasons. The specific reasons may vary from person to person.
Wu Jing's " The Climber " had received a lot of negative reviews before it was even released. Why would this happen? The Climber was a sci-fi action film directed, starred, and co-produced by Wu Jing. It was released in the mainland of China on August 10th, 2020. However, after the film was released, it was widely criticized and questioned. Many viewers thought that the plot and performance were not good enough. Some even thought that it was a "PowerPoint movie." Why did this happen? The following are some possible reasons: 1. Unreasonable plot: Some viewers felt that the plot and setting in the movie were not reasonable enough and lacked logic and credibility. For example, the movie had an existence known as the Chosen One. The lack of scientific basis in the setting confused the audience. 2. Poor performance: Wu Jing's performance in the movie was also criticized by some people who thought that his performance was too exaggerated and not realistic enough. In addition, the performances of the other actors in the movie were not outstanding enough, which affected the overall effect of the movie. 3. Low production quality: The production quality of the climber is not satisfactory. For example, some of the scenes and special effects in the movie were not exquisite enough to make the audience feel uncomfortable. In addition, the movie's soundtracks and sound effects were not outstanding enough, affecting the atmosphere and effect of the entire movie. 4. Insufficient publicity: The promotion of the climber was not sufficient, so the audience did not have enough understanding of its quality and reputation. Some viewers might not have seen enough publicity and promotion in front of the cinema and did not understand the background and reputation of the film, so they doubted its quality. In summary, the reason why The Climber received a lot of bad reviews before it was released could be due to many factors, including the plot, performance, production quality, publicity, and so on. The audience should look at the movie objectively, not believe in some unverified publicity and evaluation, and rationally evaluate the quality and value of the movie.
One reason could be the overly complex and unrelatable plot. Maybe the story's progression is too convoluted for some viewers to follow easily. Another might be the characters not being well - developed enough. If the audience can't connect with the characters on an emotional level, they are less likely to enjoy the movie. Also, the pacing could be off. If it drags in certain parts, it can lead to a negative review.
The movie " Climber " was a Chinese mountaineering film released in 2019. It told the story of the Chinese mountaineer Li Na and her team climbing Mount Everest in the 1960s. Although this movie had a certain level of storytelling and character portrayals, there were some flaws as follows: 1. Over-beautification of Mount Everest: The film's description of Mount Everest is too beautified, ignoring the dangers and difficulties of climbing. In fact, climbing Mount Everest was an extremely dangerous activity that required a wealth of experience and skills, as well as sufficient physical and mental quality. 2. There are problems with the character portrayals: Some of the characters in the movie are too rigid and lack realism and depth. For example, the protagonist Li Na's character image was too singular and lacked personal characteristics and emotional descriptions. At the same time, her leadership and decision-making abilities also had certain problems. 3. The plot development is too linear: The plot development in the movie is too linear and lacks change and surprise. For example, during the climbing process, some key plot developments lacked foreshadowing and climax, making it difficult for the audience to resonate and emotionally invest. 4. There are many historical knowledge errors: Some plots and character settings in the movie have historical knowledge errors. For example, the movie described the 1960 Mount Everest mountaineering incident as too simple and vague, lacking a deep understanding and respect for the actual situation at that time. Although the story and character of " The Climber " were of a certain standard, there were still some flaws that required the audience to pay attention and think about when watching.
One common reason could be his strict teaching methods. He might be seen as too harsh on students, not allowing for enough creativity or individual growth. For example, his no - nonsense attitude towards discipline could be perceived as stifling for some students who need more flexibility in their learning environment.
Yes, the audience's evaluation of Dune 2 was generally not good. The audience generally felt that the film's plot was lacking, causing the audience to feel aesthetic fatigue. Although the visual effects and special effects were still excellent, the director's narrative was lengthy and lacked a sense of cohesion. In addition, some viewers expressed dissatisfaction with the male lead's performance, thinking that his image was different from the original setting. Therefore, it could be said that Dune 2 received a bad review after its release.
The Great Tang's Di Gong case received unanimous negative comments from the audience. The audience's negative comments on the show mainly focused on the plot design being outrageous, the adaptation of the original work being too big, the casting being inappropriate, the acting being greasy, and so on. They thought that the logic of the plot was chaotic, the reasoning process was child's play, the characters lacked depth, the lines were stiff, and the emotions were not sincere. In addition, the audience also expressed their dissatisfaction with the acting skills of the lead actor, Zhou Yiwei. They felt that his acting style was too greasy and did not match the role. In general, there was a big gap between the audience's expectations and the actual performance of the play, which was the main reason why the play was criticized.
Maybe his overprotective nature is seen as a bad trait. He tries to shield his kids from the dangers of the world, but in doing so, he might not allow them to grow and learn from their own experiences. He could be making all the decisions for them without considering their opinions, which would make him seem like a bad father.
After the release of Dune 2, it received a general negative review from the audience. The audience unanimously agreed that the movie's plot was too slow, causing the audience to feel tired. Although the visual effects and special effects were still excellent, the director's narrative was a little lengthy and lacked a sense of cohesion. In addition, some of the audience expressed dissatisfaction with the male lead's performance, thinking that his image was becoming more and more "tea", which was different from the original setting. The audience also pointed out that Dune 2 had problems in expressing the essence of the original work, causing conflicts between the original fans and the audience who knew the story for the first time. Overall, the audience's negative reviews of Dune 2 were mainly focused on the plot and character design.
One reason could be its non - linear narrative. Some viewers might find it confusing as the story jumps around in time. It doesn't follow the traditional chronological order, which can be a turn - off for those who prefer straightforward storytelling.
In March 2024, six bad dramas appeared. These bad dramas included Ice Hunting, Legend of the Sword and Fairy IV, and Detective Hero. The audience's evaluation of these dramas was not high. The plot was chaotic, the acting was stiff, and the logic was illogical. However, in addition to these bad dramas, there were also many good works in the domestic drama market in 2024, such as "Flowers" and "Big River 3." These excellent series won the audience's love with their excellent production and vivid stories. Although the existence of bad dramas had a negative impact on the drama market, the audience still expected more excellent shows to appear in the future.