Definitely not. 'Congo' is a work of fiction. It was written to take readers on a thrilling and imaginative journey, not based on any actual happenings.
The book 'Congo' is purely fictional. It doesn't draw from real-life events or people. The author crafted the story to entertain and engage readers with a made-up adventure.
No, 'Congo' is not based on a true story. It's a fictional work created for entertainment purposes.
No, it isn't. Congo is a fictional adventure movie with a made-up plot.
Congo is purely fictional. It's a work of imagination, not based on real events or people. The plot and characters are made up to captivate the audience.
No, Congo was not based on a Lovecraft story. It has its own unique plot and source material.
No. 'Congo' is not based on a Lovecraft story.
Definitely not. '1984' is a dystopian novel that was created from the imagination of the author to present a cautionary tale about totalitarianism and surveillance, not based on real events.
No, the book 'It' is not based on a true story. It's a work of fiction created by the author's imagination.
Not exactly. While it may draw some inspiration from real-life situations, it's mostly a fictional creation with fictional plotlines and characters.
The book 'It' is purely fictional. The author crafted the story and characters from their creative mind rather than real events.
Well, in a sense it might be. Sometimes stories claim to be based on true events but are highly dramatized. In the case of 'Book of Blood', there could be some real - life inspirations like certain cultural beliefs about blood and the afterlife that the author has incorporated and built a fictional narrative around.