It depends on how you define 'true story'. Some elements of 'After the Flood' are based on real incidents, but there might be fictionalized parts for dramatic effect.
No, it's not. 'After the Flood' is a purely fictional creation with no basis in reality.
I don't think it is. Usually, stories like this are crafted by the author's imagination to engage and touch the readers' hearts rather than being based on real events.
Not really. 'The Flood' is more of a fictional creation rather than being rooted in real events.
The movie 'Flood' is not based on a true story. It's a work of fiction that might draw inspiration from various sources but doesn't have a real-life basis. The plot and characters are invented for entertainment purposes.
It's not a true story. The movie was created from the imagination of the writers and filmmakers. They came up with the story to entertain the audience rather than being based on real events.
It's mostly a myth or legend. There's no scientific evidence to prove that a global flood of that scale ever happened.
It's a matter of belief. Some people think it's a true account based on religious teachings, while others view it as a symbolic or mythical story.
I'm not certain. It could be a completely fictional creation just made to evoke emotions or it could have roots in a true incident that was then elaborated upon for the story.
One aspect to consider in 'after the flood short story' could be the theme of survival. The characters in the story might be facing numerous challenges after the flood, such as finding food, shelter, and clean water. This struggle for basic necessities can show the resilience of human nature.
No, 'After' isn't based on real life. It's a made-up tale. The author likely came up with the ideas and scenarios to entertain and engage readers without being tied to actual happenings.
No, 'After' is not based on a true story. It's a fictional creation by the author.