Can you give examples of how the NY Times 'blew it' with the Kavanaugh story?

It means the NY Times made a significant mistake in handling the Kavanaugh story. Maybe they misreported facts, or didn't do proper research before publishing, which led to inaccurate or unfair coverage.

The 'ny times kavanaugh story' is mainly about Brett Kavanaugh. It probably delved into the sexual assault allegations he faced during his nomination to the Supreme Court. The story might have included details about the accusers, their testimonies, and Kavanaugh's responses. The New York Times could have also explored how this affected the political climate in the United States, as the nomination was a highly politicized event. There were strong opinions on both sides, with some believing the accusations and others supporting Kavanaugh's confirmation.

Well, if it's about his confirmation, the main point was the serious sexual assault allegations against him. This led to intense public scrutiny and a very divisive confirmation process.

The 'ny times kavanaugh story' greatly influenced public perception. It made the sexual assault allegations against Kavanaugh a major talking point. People who were following the story closely had to grapple with the credibility of the accusers and Kavanaugh's denials. It led to a more widespread discussion about the vetting process for Supreme Court nominees. Many in the public started to question whether enough was being done to ensure that nominees were of good character. It also caused a rift in public opinion, with some losing faith in the political system's ability to handle such sensitive nominations fairly, while others became more entrenched in their pre - existing beliefs depending on which side of the political spectrum they were on.

I'm not entirely sure specifically which 'New York Times Brett Kavanaugh story' you're referring to. There have been various stories related to Brett Kavanaugh in the NYT. It could be about his confirmation process to the Supreme Court, which was highly controversial and involved accusations of sexual misconduct.

It misled the public. People might have formed inaccurate opinions about Kavanaugh based on the botched story.

I'm not sure of the exact titles off the top of my head, but they could include books from popular authors who often make the best - seller lists.

The NY Times botching the Kavanaugh story could be due to a number of reasons. Maybe there was a lack of proper fact - checking within their editorial process. It could have also been a case of rushing to publish without fully verifying all the details. When this happened, it not only affected Kavanaugh's image but also the public's understanding of the situation. Supporters and opponents of Kavanaugh would have received wrong information, which could have further polarized the already divided public opinion on the matter. And this also highlights the importance of media integrity and the need for the NY Times to be more careful in their reporting in the future.

There are some who think that the NYT's coverage of political campaigns contains 'fake stories'. For instance, during an election, if a story is published about a candidate's past actions that doesn't align with the way a particular group wants to view the candidate. But in reality, the NYT is reporting based on sources and evidence. They may not always get it 100% right, but it's not fair to simply label it as 'fake'.

One example could be some of its reporting on certain political events where the facts were later found to be misrepresented. For instance, in a story about a policy implementation, they might have exaggerated the negative impacts without fully considering all the aspects and data available at the time.