Well, it could be a critic who has analyzed the light novel industry deeply. They might have noticed trends such as the mass - production of low - quality light novels with little innovation. This critic could be frustrated with the lack of originality and the over - saturation of the market. They might believe that 'killing' the light novel in its current form could lead to a rebirth or a more refined version of the genre in the future. So, they would be the one to say 'kill the light novel'.
Maybe a traditional literature purist. They might think light novels are too simplistic or formulaic compared to classic literature, so they would say 'kill the light novel' to uphold the so - called higher standards of traditional writing.
It could be that the story has a strong emotional impact on people. It has created such a connection with its audience that it's impossible to just make it disappear. For example, a love story that has inspired generations. People keep talking about it and it lives on. So, they say 'you can't kill the story'.
An author who is modest about their work might say this. They might be aware that their writing doesn't have all the elements that are typically associated with a great American novel.
Such a statement is beyond comprehension. Cartoon channels are supposed to provide entertainment and positive messages, not promote hate or violence of any kind. This could be a result of extreme mismanagement or a malicious act.
Perhaps a die - hard fan of McKenzie's novels. Someone who is so immersed in the stories and the world created by McKenzie that they make such a strange and poetic statement.
The 'Kill la Kill' light novel likely expands on the story of the 'Kill la Kill' anime. It may delve deeper into the characters' backstories, like Ryuko Matoi's journey to find her father's killer. It could also explore more about the world of Honnouji Academy and the power dynamics there.
Someone who doesn't like the movie might say it. Maybe a person who is very conservative and doesn't approve of the movie's violence and vulgar language.
A character who is ambitious and wants to control their own destiny within the story might say this. For example, a strong - willed female lead who is tired of being pushed around by other characters or the plot.
The story was about the male protagonist, Rob, who embarked on a journey to find his beloved pig that had been kidnapped. The movie highlighted the emotions and pain deep inside the protagonist's heart, and presented a journey about human nature and emotions with the theme of food, memories, loss, and love. Nicholas Cage played the role of Rob in the film, who traded for the freedom of the pig by searching for black truffles. The ending of the movie might be more tragic than it seemed, hinting at the loneliness and despair of the protagonist.
Someone who has a strong sense of what makes a good story in terms of plot, character, and style. If they read a story that completely misses the mark on all these aspects, they could use this phrase. For example, if a story has a muddled plot, unrelatable characters, and a writing style that is both boring and hard to follow, an experienced writer or a passionate reader might say 'only a clam would write that story'.