What does 'like all history is fiction' mean?

Well, it might imply that the stories we are told as history are constructed in a similar way to fiction. Historians have to select what to include and how to present it. Just like in fiction, there's a construction of a narrative. And this construction can sometimes distort or simplify the complex reality of the past, making it seem more like a made - up story, thus like fiction.

It could imply that history is often written from a subjective point of view. Those who record history may have biases, agendas, or limited perspectives. So, in a sense, the 'facts' presented might be shaped by these factors, making it seem like a form of fiction.

In my view, 'power all fiction' could imply a dominant force within the fictional universe. It might be a character trait, a narrative device, or a cultural influence that has the potential to shape all forms of fiction. For example, the concept of the hero's journey is a powerful narrative structure that can be found in a vast amount of fiction across different cultures and time periods. It has the power to drive the plot, develop characters, and engage the audience, thus in a way, it powers all fiction.

Well, 'pile all fiction' might be an instruction to stack or group all fictional materials. Maybe in a bookstore, they want to 'pile all fiction' for a special display. It could also refer to collecting all fictional stories in a digital library or on a reading app.

It could mean that history is essentially made up of the most engaging and memorable stories. History is full of events, people, and cultures, and these elements are often presented in the form of stories. These stories are the best in the sense that they are rich in knowledge, human experience, and can be highly captivating.

When Anzaldúa says 'history is fiction', it may imply that history is not a fixed and unchangeable account of the past. It is malleable, like fiction. Historians select what to include and what to exclude, similar to how an author decides what to put in a story. And, just as fiction can be used to convey certain values or ideas, history can also be used to uphold or challenge existing power relations and cultural norms. For instance, the way a nation's history is written can either reinforce national pride and a sense of superiority or expose the flaws and injustices within the society.

It could mean that in the world of Calvin and Hobbes, their take on history is more like a fictionalized or made - up version. Maybe it's a comment on how they perceive historical events in their own imaginative way.

Well, it might imply that religion is more of a relic of the past, something that we study from a historical perspective. In terms of fiction, religious stories and figures often serve as great sources of inspiration. Think about how the story of Noah's Ark has been retold and adapted in various fictional works. It shows that religion can be a rich wellspring for fictional creativity.

Well, history is written by the victors in many cases. This means that the version of events that gets recorded and passed down may not be the whole truth. It can be manipulated to serve certain interests, just like in fiction where the writer has an agenda. Also, our understanding of historical events is often based on limited evidence, and we fill in the blanks with assumptions, much like creating a fictional story.

Perhaps it means that human creativity in fiction has a limit in terms of the types of stories. 'All fiction is seven stories' could suggest that across different cultures and times, there are just seven distinct plot patterns that are recycled and reimagined. For instance, the story of the underdog rising up (a common adventure type) is one of those seven. These seven form the building blocks for every fictional tale ever told.