What does 'never let truth interfere good story' mean?

Well, it implies that a good story is more important than the truth in some cases. Take folk tales or legends, for instance. They are full of elements that may not be strictly true but are there to convey a moral or just to be an exciting story. People like to be entertained, and if the truth gets in the way of that entertainment, this saying suggests that the truth can be sacrificed for the sake of a great story.

Yes, in the context of fiction. Fiction is a form of art and creativity. As long as it's clear that it's a fictional story, it's okay to not be strictly truthful. Writers are free to create worlds and characters that deviate from reality to make a great story.

It means that sometimes people prefer to stick to an interesting or fictional narrative rather than let the boring or inconvenient truth disrupt it. For example, in fictional stories, authors might take some liberties with historical facts to make the story more engaging.

Definitely not. While in creative writing such as fantasy or science - fiction, bending the truth to create an exciting story is common. However, in fields where accuracy matters, like technical writing or historical research, this principle is completely wrong. In historical research, for instance, if you let go of the truth, you're distorting history. So it depends on the type of writing.

It means that in creative writing, sometimes strict adherence to facts can limit the imaginative and engaging aspects of a story. For example, a historical fiction writer might tweak some minor historical details to make the plot more exciting or to better fit the character arcs. It's about prioritizing the narrative's entertainment value over absolute truth.

Basically, 'never let the facts spoil a good story' is about the idea that a story's allure can be more important than its factual basis. In journalism, this would be unethical, but in creative writing or casual storytelling, it can be different. Think of tall tales or legends. These often deviate from the facts but are still great stories. People might change details or events to fit the mood or message they want to convey in their story. For instance, a fisherman might exaggerate the size of the fish he caught to make his fishing story more exciting for his friends at the pub.

This statement suggests that stories can be a form of escapism or entertainment. We might be more interested in the narrative flow, the characters, and the overall mood of a story. If we always insisted on strict factualness, many great stories, such as fairy tales or science - fiction epics, would lose their magic. Facts can be constraining, while a good story allows for creativity and imagination to run wild.

It means that sometimes, for the sake of a great narrative, we shouldn't let the cold, hard facts get in the way. For example, in fictional stories, we often suspend our disbelief and accept the made - up world. If we were to constantly apply real - world logic and facts, it could destroy the magic of the story.

It means that you should be in control of your own life and how it is perceived. Don't let others define who you are or what you can achieve.

This statement implies that a good story can be more important than the factual truth. People like to be entertained, and a well - crafted story can do that better than just stating the facts. Take folk tales for instance. They are passed down through generations not because they are strictly true, but because they make for great stories that teach lessons, inspire, or just amuse. The truth might be too dull or complex to have the same impact.