What's the portrayal of India and the moon in the New York Times' cartoon?

The reply from Times of India cartoon to The New York Times could vary depending on the context and the topic at hand. Maybe it was a sharp critique or a more diplomatic response. You'd have to dig deeper into the relevant reports to find out.

I'm not sure exactly. Maybe it was about some cultural aspect or a current event related to India.

It's hard to say exactly. The portrayal might vary depending on the perspective and the message the cartoonist intended to convey.

The cartoon might present them in a variety of ways, depending on the artist's perspective and the context of the cartoon.

The response from The Times of India to the New York Times' cartoon could have been multifaceted. They might have pointed out factual inaccuracies, questioned the intent behind it, or proposed a more balanced view. It really depends on the specific content and context of the cartoon.

The cartoon might show Trump walking the dog in a light-hearted or satirical way, depending on the context and the artist's intention.

The New York Times cartoons' coverage of India can be sporadic. It depends on the current events and topics of interest. Sometimes there are detailed and insightful cartoons related to India, but at other times, it might not be a major focus.

Well, it could be that a cartoon in the New York Times depicted a story involving people or events from India and Paris. Or perhaps there was some sort of coverage or commentary about a cartoon related to those places.

The cartoon might present a unique perspective or satirical take on the topic. But without seeing it specifically, it's hard to give exact details.

The New York Times cartoons about India could present a diverse range of images. They might showcase traditional Indian customs, modern urban life, or global relations involving India. It all depends on what the cartoonist wants to convey and the context at the time.