Why is the plating in the cartoon about New Yorker so terrible?

Well, the plating in those cartoons could be deemed terrible if it's too simplistic, doesn't stand out, or doesn't add to the story or humor. Maybe the artist didn't put enough effort into making it visually interesting.

Maybe it lacks creativity or has poor drawing skills. The colors and details might not be appealing either.

Maybe it's because the new style doesn't match the expectations or the charm of the previous ones. It could be too different or lack the familiar elements that people loved.

Well, there could be several reasons. Sometimes the writers and animators don't have enough experience or passion for the project. Or maybe the target audience wasn't properly identified, leading to a mismatch in content.

Well, it could be that the colors are off, the characters look odd, or the animation is choppy. All these factors might contribute to it being labeled as terrible.

It could be that the kid is not focused or is too nervous, which affects the way they throw the baseball in the cartoon. Also, the animation might not be very well done, making the throw seem worse than it is.

It could be that the cartoonist wanted to draw attention to the importance of preparedness in case of fires in urban areas like New York. Or, it might just be a creative expression of a fictional scenario for entertainment purposes.

I think it's mainly because of the changes in the character designs and the plot. Some fans felt it strayed too far from the original concept.

Often, cartoons get rejected by the New Yorker because they fail to stand out among the competition. It could be that the theme was too common, or the execution wasn't polished enough. Sometimes, it's just a matter of the editor's personal taste not aligning with the submission.

It could be that the director didn't give clear instructions or there wasn't enough time for rehearsals. Poor audio equipment or recording conditions might also be to blame.