Why do some people consider certain cartoons to be stupid looking?

It might be because they think the way the eyes are drawn looks odd or doesn't make sense to them.

Some manga might be considered bad if the pacing is off, the dialogue is clunky, or if it fails to deliver on promised themes or genres. Sometimes it's simply a matter of personal taste not aligning with the content.

A manga might be seen as weak if it fails to engage the reader. This could happen if the pacing is off, the world-building is lacking, or if it just doesn't offer anything new or exciting.

Some fantasy novels are considered the worst because they lack originality. For example, if a book just copies the plot of other well - known fantasies like a group of heroes going on a quest to defeat an evil lord, but does it in a really bland way, it's not going to be well - received. There's no new spin on the concept.

Some people find manga incompatible because of factors like a slow pace, lack of engaging plot twists, or characters they just can't connect with.

Some people think certain anime manga characters are ugly because of factors like unconventional hairstyles, strange clothing choices, or facial features that deviate from the norm. Personal preferences also play a big role in this judgment.

Well, it could be that the creators wanted to challenge the norm and create something different. Sometimes, a 'stupid looking' design can actually be quite memorable and attract attention in a crowded market of cartoons.

Maybe it's the way they are drawn or the simplistic storylines. Sometimes, poor animation quality can also make them seem stupid.

It might be for creating a unique and memorable style. Funny-looking characters can stand out and make the cartoon more distinctive.

I think it's just a matter of personal taste. Some folks might not appreciate the style or the way they exaggerate features.