In the debate competition, I am the affirmative and second debate. The debate topic society should value profit over righteousness. How should I ask the other party questions? I want examples.

In a debate, the second debate usually requires three questions to support one's point of view. The following are the specific answers to these three questions: Do you think this view is correct? What is the significance of this argument? If this argument is wrong, why is it wrong?

An example of a debate on the Internet where the disadvantages outweighed the advantages was as follows: Dear judges and listeners, The Internet has become an indispensable part of our daily lives. The Internet has brought us many conveniences, allowing us to access information, learn knowledge, communicate and interact at any time and anywhere. It has even changed the way we work. However, the network has also brought many negative effects, which are worthy of our serious consideration and discussion. The negative effects of the internet mainly included two aspects. On the one hand, the spread of online rumors and false information has made us lose trust. On the internet, we often receive all kinds of unverified information, which may be false and harmful. We are easily affected by them, causing our trust in society, government, enterprises and love to decrease. On the other hand, addiction to the Internet will make us lose the joy of life. There are many games, social media, and virtual worlds on the internet that can bring short-term happiness, but once we get addicted to them, it's hard to get rid of this happiness and lose the joy of life. In addition, the abuse of the Internet would also bring serious consequences. Online fraud, cyberviolence, cybercrime, and other problems emerged one after another. The abuse of the Internet would not only cause harm to individuals but also have a negative impact on society. To sum up, although the network has brought us a lot of convenience, there are also many negative effects. We should seriously consider these issues and take measures to control and manage them to ensure that the use of the Internet is beneficial, safe and healthy. Thank you.

An example of the pros and cons of the Internet is as follows: Dear judges and dear audience, As an important part of modern society, the Internet has deeply changed our way of life. The Internet has brought us convenience, allowing us to access information, learn knowledge, communicate with others, socialize, and even engage in entertainment. At the same time, the Internet has also brought many negative effects, such as network security problems, information leakage, addiction to the Internet, and so on. The convenience of the Internet was obvious. We can easily access all kinds of information, learn new knowledge, and understand the development of the world through the Internet. With the help of the Internet, we can communicate with friends and family more quickly and improve our relationship. The Internet has also brought a lot of fun to our lives. For example, we can buy goods online and enjoy the convenience and fun of online shopping. However, there were also some negative effects of the Internet. The convenience of the Internet made it easy for people to be addicted to it, leading to information leakage and network security issues. Our personal information is easy to be stolen by criminals and even suffer from online fraud and other dangers. The Internet could also cause people to lack the ability to think independently and be easily influenced and guided by others, thus leading them to deviate from the right path. In addition, the internet can also lead to social isolation and loneliness because many people may not be able to find like-minded friends in real life. To sum up, the network had both advantages and disadvantages. We should be aware of the risks and problems of the internet and take measures to reduce its negative effects. We need to strengthen the management and supervision of the network to ensure the security and stability of the network. We also need more education and publicity to let the public understand the benefits and risks of the Internet and to raise people's safety awareness and defense capabilities. The pros and cons of the internet were inevitable. We should make use of the advantages of the network and take effective measures to reduce its negative effects. The development of the Internet should be centered on the interests of the people and make the Internet a useful tool in our daily lives.

The opposing side's second defense is very grateful for the free debate question you provided. Here are some possible questions for your reference: Is it necessary to balance personal interests and professional prospects? If you have to make a choice, which factor do you think should be prioritized? Should personal interests be excluded when choosing a major? If you have to make a choice, which major do you think you should prioritize your personal interests? 3. How to ensure that students don't lose their motivation for majors that have no obvious interest? How to encourage students to pursue their interests while also considering their future employment prospects? Should students who are interested but have poor job prospects choose this major? If students choose this major, will they succeed? Should students 'personal background and adaptability be taken into account when choosing a major? If students don't have enough background and adaptability, can they adapt to the new major?

The development of the Internet has more advantages than disadvantages for literature. The slogan of the debate competition is as follows: 1. Make literature better: The development of the Internet creates a better environment for the development of literature, making literary works closer to readers and more colorful. 2. Online literature is also literature: the development of the Internet not only allows online literature to be more widely spread, but also improves the quality and level of literature, making literature more diverse and rich. 3. The development of the Internet has promoted literary innovation: The development of Internet technology has provided more opportunities and platforms for literary innovation, allowing literature to be closer to the needs of the times and readers. 4. Let literature go global: The development of the Internet makes it easier for literature to go global, attracting more readers and authors, expanding the influence and coverage of literature. The development of the Internet makes literature more convenient: The development of the Internet makes literature more convenient. The readers can read literary works anytime and anywhere, and it also provides more opportunities and platforms for literary writers to create.

The development of the Internet had more advantages than disadvantages for literature. 1. Online literature helps literary creation to promote the prosperity of literature. 2. Online development of literary peers. Online literature is a new window for literature, providing readers with a wider range of reading choices. 4. The development of the internet and the advancement of literature. 5. Make online literature a part of literature to bring readers a better reading experience. Online literature is the future of literature, injecting new impetus into the development of literature. 7. The development of literature on the Internet. 8. Online literature provides readers with a brand new literary experience, contributing to the literary cause. Online literature is an indispensable part of literature, injecting new vitality into literary development. 10. A win-win situation for the development of literature on the Internet.

Positive point of view: Competition is an important driving force for social progress and development. It can promote the innovation and competitiveness of individuals and organizations, and promote economic development and scientific and technological progress. Competition in the business field can promote the difference and innovation between enterprises, improve the quality and efficiency of products and services, and bring more business opportunities and profits. Competition in the field of science and technology could promote technological innovation and development, improve technological standards and competitiveness, and bring more business opportunities and market share. However, competition can also lead to negative consequences such as market failure, monopoly, and unfair competition. Monopolists could gain unfair advantages through pricing and controlling resources, affecting consumer welfare and market competition. In addition, monopolies may gain market share and profits through improper means, causing adverse effects on society and the economy. Therefore, competition should be conducted under the premise of law and morality. All parties should abide by the principle of fair competition and avoid unfair means and unfair competition. In the field of business and technology, the government should formulate relevant policies and regulations to promote market competition and cooperation to ensure consumer welfare and market order. Opposite point of view: Cooperation is an important force to promote social progress and development. It can promote the coordination and cooperation of individuals and organizations, enhance creativity and innovation, and improve the overall efficiency and welfare of society. Cooperation in the business field could achieve better results through joint innovation and resource sharing to improve the quality and efficiency of products and services. Cooperation in the field of science and technology could promote academic research and technological innovation, improve technological standards and competitiveness, and bring more business opportunities and market share. However, there were also some problems in cooperation, such as lack of competitiveness, insufficient innovation, waste of resources, and so on. Cooperation may lead to the alienation or neglect of some individuals or organizations, resulting in a lack of competitiveness and innovation. In addition, cooperation may also lead to some immoral behavior and monopolistic behavior, which will have a negative impact on society and the economy. Therefore, cooperation should be conducted legally and ethically. All parties should abide by the principles of honesty and sharing to strengthen cooperation and innovation. In the fields of business and technology, the government should formulate relevant policies and regulations to promote cooperation and innovation to ensure consumer welfare and market order.

Affirmative point of view: You should read famous literary works. A literary masterpiece was a classic that had been tested over time and was widely praised. It contained a wealth of knowledge and ideas that could help people improve their cultural quality, broaden their horizons, and enlighten their minds. Through reading literary masterpieces, we can understand important issues in history, philosophy, sociology, psychology and other fields, gain deep thinking and insight, and enhance our critical thinking and logical thinking ability. Literature masterpieces are also wonderful works that can help us appreciate and enjoy the beauty of art. These works usually contain deep emotions and thoughts that can bring us emotional resonance and enlightenment. At the same time, these works can also express human emotions and thoughts in different ways, allowing us to have a deeper understanding of human culture and humanity. Reading literary classics can not only improve our cultural quality and aesthetic ability, but also make us better understand the world and life. Therefore, we should try our best to read literary classics to gain more enlightenment and gains from them.

Bread and love was a common choice in life. The positive side believes that bread is more important than love because bread is the basic need for our survival while love requires constant investment and management. The following is the summary of the second debate: Bread was a basic requirement for survival. Human society was built on food and housing. We can't live without bread. In modern society, bread has become an indispensable food in our daily lives. Therefore, we must acknowledge the importance of bread. Love requires constant investment and management. Love was not only a feeling, but also a kind of responsibility and sacrifice. In real life, we can see many love stories in which both parties have to put in a lot of effort and investment to maintain this love. But if there was only love without bread, this kind of love would be difficult to last. Bread is more practical than love. When we need to meet our basic needs, bread is more practical than love. We can use bread to pay for necessities such as water, electricity, gas and so on. Love, on the other hand, required constant investment and management, which was not an easy thing in real life. Bread can help us pursue higher goals. When we have bread, we can choose to pursue more noble goals such as learning, career, travel and so on. These activities can help us realize our self-worth and also give us more choices. To sum up, bread was more important than love. We need to satisfy our basic survival needs before we can think of higher goals. Of course, this does not mean that love is not important. On the contrary, love plays an important role in our lives. However, bread was more important than the basic needs of survival.

Is it beneficial to open the book to debate (I'm in the affirmative): In discussing the benefits of opening books, we need to make the following points clear: 1. Opening the book does not mean that the content itself is harmful. Reading beneficial content under the right conditions can promote personal growth and development. For example, learning new knowledge, understanding history and culture, appreciating literary works, and so on could all be done by opening books. Reading was not entirely harmless. Reading could bring about some negative effects such as addiction, negative emotions, and so on. Therefore, we need to consider the impact and consequences of reading and take appropriate measures to reduce the negative effects. 3. Whether or not an open book is beneficial depends on the content of the reading and the way of reading. If the content of the book was valuable, but the way of reading it was not appropriate, it might still have a negative impact. Therefore, when reading, we need to pay attention to the reading method and attitude to minimize the negative effects. To sum up, I think it's beneficial to open a book. Although reading will bring some negative effects, as long as we read beneficial content under appropriate conditions and adopt appropriate reading methods and attitudes, we can minimize the negative effects and promote personal growth and development.