Did the extended edition of the journal count?

The extended edition of the source journals of the China Institute of Science and Technology Information (CCSCI) was an extended edition of a group of CCSCI source journals published by the China Institute of Science and Technology Information (CCSCI), which included all the journals included in the CCSCI. These journals were usually important journals in the field of academic research with high academic reputation and influence. The extended edition of the source journal of the CSCI was a core journal with high authority and academic value. It had a high reputation and influence in the academic community and society. However, it should be noted that the evaluation criteria and content of core journals would vary from institution to institution, from discipline to discipline, and from era to era. Therefore, not all extended versions of the source journals of the CSSSCI were core journals.

The extended version of the journal catalog of the Chinese Academy of Science and Technology Index referred to the extended version of the journal catalog of the Chinese Academy of Science and Technology Online. It was a system used by the China Institute of Science and Technology Information to classify and search Chinese academic journals. It included more academic journals and added some new classification and search methods. The expanded version of the journal catalog not only included traditional journals, but also some emerging journals and journals in cutting-edge research fields. The extended version of the journal catalog was an important tool for the academic community and scientific and technological information search. It could help people find and read relevant academic papers more quickly and accurately.

The C-journal expansion board was an academic journal in the mainland of China that belonged to the journal catalog of the National Library of China. According to the China Academic Periodical Evaluation database, the journal index C expansion board included academic journals, conference proceedings, reports, popular science books, and many other types. The C-level journals were usually classified as Chinese academic journals. Their grades were divided into three grades, A, B, and C, by the China Association for Science and Technology and the State Administration of Press, Pub.& Media, Film and Television. Class A journals were academic journals of higher quality, Class B journals were academic journals of higher quality, and Class C journals were more ordinary academic journals. The content of the C journal covered natural sciences, engineering technology, social sciences, humanities, and many other fields. It was one of the important reference resources for the academic community in the mainland of China.

Dune was a sci-fi adventure film released in 1984. It was directed by David Lin Qi and co-written by David Lin Qi and Frank Herbert. The movie told the story of Sandan IV in the distant future. He was the king of the universe and controlled the entire empire through power and force. Although there was an extended version of the movie, it still did not fully present the entire content of the original novel. The movie's Douban rating was 6.1/10, and its IDB rating was 6.4/10. As for the other versions of "Sand Dune" and the actors, there was no mention of them in the search results.

The source journals and the extended versions of the journal are important components of the journal classification system used to identify and track high-quality journals in the fields of Web development and computer science. The source journal of the Chinese Academy of Sciences was developed and maintained by the Institute of Computer Technology of the Chinese Academy of Sciences. The source journals of the CSSSCI were journals recognized under the CSSSCI classification standards. The papers of these journals were widely used in computer science and Web development research and development. The extended edition was a sub-set of the source journals of the CSSSCI, including all the journals recognized by the CSSSCI classification standards and some important sub-journals of the CSSSCI source journals. The main difference between the extended edition and the source journal was the scope and number of journals included. Therefore, the source journals and extended versions of the CSSSCI were important reference resources that could help researchers understand the latest developments in computer science and Web development, as well as the quality and credibility of the papers published in these journals.

The main difference between the two was the evaluation criteria. The source journal of the CSSSCI was the foundation of the CSSSCI evaluation system and one of the most important journals in the CSSSCI evaluation system. The source journals were selected according to the evaluation criteria of the CSSSCI. These journals met the requirements of the CSSSCI evaluation in terms of content, style, and structure. Therefore, the source journals of the SSSCI were an important part of the SSSCI evaluation system and an important basis for the SSSCI evaluation organization. The extended version was a further expansion of the source journals of the SSSCI, adding some new evaluation criteria to include many emerging journals and fields. The expanded version of the journal covered a wider range of content. More journals were recognized as the source journals of the SSSCI, and more evaluation indicators and methods were provided. Therefore, the main difference between the source journal and the extended version of the journal was the evaluation criteria. The source journals were selected according to the evaluation criteria of the CSSSCI, which was an important part of the CSSSCI evaluation system. The extended version added some new evaluation criteria to cover a wider range of content, and more new journals were recognized as CSSSCI source journals.

The source journal and the extended version of the source journal were both applications of the evaluation standards of the CSSSCI, but their specific content and scope of application were slightly different. The source journals of the SSSCI referred to the journals specified in the SSSCI evaluation standards. These journals were usually academic journals, conference proceedings, and degree theses. The source journal of the CSSSCI was the core component of the CSSSCI evaluation standard, responsible for providing reliable source data for the CSSSCI evaluation. The extended edition of the source journal of the CSSSCI expanded the content and scope of the journal on the basis of the source journal of the CSSSCI. The extended version of the journal included non-academic journals such as news articles, books, reports, and conference papers. These extended versions of the source journals provided the source data for the evaluation of the SSSCI, and at the same time, they also enriched the standards and content of the evaluation. Therefore, the main difference between the source journal and the extended version of the source journal was their source scope and content composition. The source journals of the CSSSCI were mainly academic journals, while the extended version of the CSSSCI source journals covered more non-academic journals.

The CSSSCI International Conference was an international academic conference organized by the International Organization for the Study of the Styles of Styles (SSS). It was intended to promote the application and promotion of the SSS standard. Therefore, the source journals of the SSSCI conference were usually the SSSCI journals, including the extended edition. The journal was the official journal of the conference. It included the academic reports, papers, and exhibition content during the conference. The expanded version of the journal included more academic results and cutting-edge research outside of the conference. It should be noted that due to the growing influence of the CSSSCI standards, relevant academic achievements and cutting-edge research are also receiving more and more attention. More research results may be produced during or after the conference. These results may also be included in CSSSCI journals or extended journals.

The CS International Conference was an international academic conference organized by the CS Association to promote the widespread application and development of the CS technology in the domestic and international academic community. Therefore, the source journals of the SSSCI usually included the extended edition. An extended version of a journal was usually a journal version in which the papers published during the conference were further improved and developed in subsequent work. These extended journals are usually published together with the original conference journal and include the same papers as the original conference journal but may have some updates or modifications. It should be noted that the source journal of the CSSSCI does not necessarily contain the extended version because the extended version may be published by different authors or institutions or edited by other institutions or authors after the conference. Therefore, it was necessary to check the official website of each journal to see if the content included the extended version.

CCCD journals are included in the National Library of China's journal catalog database (CCQI) and one of the journals included in the China Academic Periodical Comprehensive Evaluation database (CCCD). The CCCD extended edition referred to the CCCD journal's extended database that included more journals in different fields and disciplines. Compared to core journals, CCCD journals and CCCD extended versions did not have a fixed standard definition. Core journals referred to the journals that were assessed as core academic journals in the China Academic Periodical Evaluation Data Base (CCTV) and China Academic Periodical Full-text Data Base (CKD) published by the China Institute of Scientific and Technical Information (IIP) and other institutions. CCCD journals and CCCD extended versions were based on a comprehensive evaluation of the journal's literature search volume, influence, quality, and many other factors. Therefore, although CCCD journals and core journals were both indicators for evaluating academic journals, the standards, scope, and evaluation methods were different.