The reason why the video I posted on the headlines didn't pass the review was that the content party complained about it and took it down?

There may be many reasons why the novel reading network does not pass the review. The following are some possible reasons: 1. The content does not meet the rules and requirements of the platform. The novel reading website might have different rules and requirements. If the work did not meet the rules of the platform, it might cause the review to fail. 2. The content has copyright issues. If the work involved copyright issues such as plagiarism or copyright violation, the platform might not pass the review. 3. The language and style do not meet the requirements of the platform. There might be different groups of readers on novel reading websites who need to ensure that the language and style of the works meet the standards of the platform in order to attract more readers. 4. There are grammar and spellings errors in the work. If the work has grammar and spellings errors, the platform may not approve it. 5. The work lacks creativity and imagination. If the work lacked creativity and imagination, the platform might not pass the review. 6. The work contains controversial or sensitive content. If the work involves controversial or sensitive content such as politics, religion, race, etc., the platform may not approve it. If you encounter any problems during the review process, it is recommended to contact the platform's customer service and provide relevant evidence so that the platform can better understand and deal with your work.

The reason why the novel did not pass the review was probably because the content was too explicit. To be explicit usually refers to a description or description that is so detailed or direct that it cannot be reconciled or avoided to cause controversy. The explicit descriptions in the novel may include sexual behavior, violence, sexual innuendo, and uncomfortable plots. These descriptions may be deemed too blunt or vulgar by the reviewers, resulting in the novel not passing the review. In order to avoid explicit descriptions in the novel, the author needs to adopt some techniques and techniques, such as avoiding direct descriptions and using metaphor and hints. At the same time, the author also needed to understand the relevant laws, regulations, and policies to ensure that the content in the novel did not violate the relevant regulations. If you are dissatisfied with the review results of the novel, you can try to contact the reviewers to communicate and explain.

Didn't the novel reading website need 20,000 to 30,000 words to pass the review? Why did he pass with 10,000 words? The number of words required by the novel reading website was not fixed. The specific requirements might vary from website to website. But generally speaking, the word count requirement for a novel was to measure the quality and complexity of the novel, as well as to allow the website to better manage and maintain the content of the novel. For a novel that passed at 10,000 words, it might be because its content was simpler, the plot and the relationship between the characters were clearer, and the writing style was more mature. It did not need too many words to show. In addition, it was also possible that the author had passed the review in advance and did not exceed the word count requirement of the website. It was just that he had not published it yet.

Chen Kun had only posted a photo of the company gathering and did not mention the video. Therefore, I don't know if Chen Kun posted a video of the company gathering.

A web novel had to meet a series of criteria to pass the review. The most important one was that it had to comply with the requirements of laws and regulations. If the novel contained illegal content such as sex, violence, horror, etc., it would not pass the review. In addition, the storyline and character creation of the novel also had to meet the review requirements. If the plot of the novel was too violent, bloody, or unsuitable for the age of the audience, it would not pass the review. If the novel cannot pass the review, you can try to modify the storyline and character to meet the review requirements. You can also consult the relevant audit institutions to understand the specific situation and seek help.

The editor's opinion was to reject the joke, which meant that the joke needed further improvement and did not meet the editor's requirements. This could be because the editor felt that some parts of the joke needed to be improved or there were specific requirements for the content, language, format, etc. of the joke. If the joke didn't meet the editor's requirements, it might be rejected or lowered.

The online drama Detective Chinatown 2 had been approved and received a distribution license, but it had not yet been broadcast.

There could be many reasons why 'New Gourd Brothers' was taken off air. First of all, according to media reports, the review of the cartoon was not smooth. It might face political, religious, cultural and other risks and challenges. Secondly, the animation production company might face financial pressure and be unable to bear the high production costs. In addition, the market demand and revenue were not satisfactory, which might cause the production company to stop or reduce production. In the end, it might be due to different copyright laws and regulations in different countries or regions that the cartoon could not be broadcast in the target market. All these factors could cause the New Gourd Brothers to stop broadcasting.

If the application for Netease Cloud Music did not pass the review, it meant that the application did not pass because there was a problem with the review standards or process of Netease Cloud Music. This doesn't mean that your music composition or singing ability isn't good enough, nor does it mean that you can't become a Netease cloud musician. You can try to feedback your application to Netease Cloud Music and submit other music creations or performances to further demonstrate your talent.

The videos posted on Baijia account needed to meet the corresponding recommendation conditions to be recommended. To be specific, he had to release video content that met the platform's requirements, including duration, theme, genre, and so on. At the same time, they also had to abide by the rules of the platform, such as the content being legal and compliant, not involving copyright, not involving prostitution, etc. If the content posted did not meet the platform's requirements or violated the rules, they would be rejected.