It could be seen that the rating of Flying Life on Douban was 6.9, which could be said to be relatively low. However, the rating was only a reference indicator. It could be affected by the number of fans and the crowd effect. Some celebrities 'movies were generally rated higher because they had a huge fan base. In addition, some people thought that " Flying Life " was a failure as a commercial film, so the rating did not exceed 8.0. Generally speaking, the ratings were determined by the audience's different views and preferences for the movie. The ratings were only a relatively subjective indicator and could not fully represent the quality of the movie.
It could be seen that the rating of Flying Life on Douban was 6.9, which could be said to be relatively low. However, the rating was only a reference indicator. It could be affected by the number of fans and the crowd effect. Some celebrities 'movies were generally rated higher because they had a huge fan base. Therefore, even though the rating of " Flying Life " was low, it didn't mean that it was a bad movie. The ratings were only the audience's personal opinions on the movie. Everyone's preferences were different, so the ratings might vary.
It could be seen that the performance of "Flying Life" on Douban was not low. According to the information in document [5], the movie's Douban score was 6.9, which was better than 84% of comedy films. Although the score was not particularly high, it was not considered low either. In addition, the document [4] also mentioned that Douban's rating of 7.0 was not low. Han Han's movie had people who liked it and people who didn't, so the rating was relatively fair. Therefore, it could be said that the Douban rating of " Flying Life " was not low.
The Douban rating of Flying Life 2 was not low. According to the information in document [1] and document [6], the Douban score of Flying Life 2 was 8.1. Although the document [1] mentioned that the initial score was as high as 8.2, it had now dropped to 7.9, but this did not mean that the score was low. In addition, according to the document [7], the Douban rating of Flying Life 2 was 8.1, and 94% of the audience thought it was better than the average rating of the comedy. Therefore, the Douban rating of Flying Life 2 was not low.
[The rating of Flying Life on Douban is not low.] Although some people didn't have a high evaluation of this movie, a Douban rating of 7.0 wasn't considered low. Han Han was a cross-industry director. Although his works had some shortcomings, they were also qualified and thoughtful. Grading was just a reflection of one's personal opinion. Those who liked him would give him a high score, while those who disliked him would give him a low score. Therefore, it could be said that the Douban rating of " Flying Life " was not low.
The main reason why 'Shanghai Fortress' had a low Douban rating was that its performance in the market was not as good as expected. The novel was set in a futuristic world, where an Earthling and an alien lived. Although this story had a high literary value, after it was adapted into a movie, the plot was too complicated and lacked attractive special effects and visual effects. As a result, the audience's reputation was not good, and the Douban rating was affected accordingly. In addition, some plots of the novel have also caused controversy, such as the relationship between humans and aliens and the ethics of science and technology, which may also affect Douban's rating.
There were a few reasons why Celestial Bane's ratings were so low. First of all, some comments pointed out that the plot was too fast, that the character of the main character, Zhang Xiaofan, was not well portrayed, and that the description of Big Bamboo Peak was not detailed enough. Secondly, some viewers felt that the degree of adaptation of the play was too high, resulting in a lower rating for the original work. In addition, some viewers questioned the scene of the show and the looks of the male and female leads. However, despite the low ratings, the show did well at the box office. This may be because the audience was not satisfied with the plot, but they were still interested in the film itself. In summary, the above is based on the search results provided.
Celestial Bane was a popular xianxia novel written by Xiao Ding and published on Qidian Chinese website. The readers loved this book very much. The story was about how heaven and earth treated all things unfairly, treating them like grass. The protagonist was an ordinary youth, but his life was extraordinary. This book could be read or listened to on the Qidian Reading App. The production level of the audio book was comparable to the post-production of a movie. It made people feel as if they were there. Hearing the Sanskrit sound would make people's hair stand on end! Now, you can also get an experience member by going to Qidian to listen to books. You can read authentic books and listen to authentic audio on the Qidian Reading App. The male lead was an ordinary teenager named Zhang Xiaofan. He was emotional and valued loyalty. Although he was not talented, he had a strong will. The female lead was a cold fairy named Lu Xueqi. She was extremely talented and her loyalty to the sect exceeded her pursuit of love.
The movie "Flying Life 2" had a score of 8.1 on Douban.
There were several reasons why iPartment's fifth season had a low rating: Plot plagiarism: As a sitcom, iPartment had a lot of plagiarism in the fifth season. For example, the character setting, storyline, and scene design in the drama were all suspected of plagiarizing other TV series or movies. This kind of plagiarism not only caused the ratings of the show to be questioned by the audience, but also made it a problem in the industry. 2. Actor's performance: Although the cast of iPartment changed in the fourth and fifth seasons, some actors did not perform as well as expected. For example, Chen He's performance in season five was criticized by some viewers for being too exaggerated and lacking in realism. In addition, some of the actors in the play were criticized by the audience for their poor acting skills. 3. Production quality: Although there were some problems with the plot and actors 'performance in the fifth season of iPartment, the production quality was not satisfactory. For example, the quality and special effects of the show were not as good as the previous seasons, and some details were not perfect enough. These factors affected the audience's evaluation of the play. For all these reasons, iPartment's fifth season's ratings were definitely low. However, although the ratings were low, it did not mean that iPartment was not worth watching. After all, iPartment had brought us so much laughter and memories, and its plagiarism issue had also received a clear response.