There was no clear answer to the Qing Emperor's original form. Some people believed that the Qing Emperor might be the prototype of Emperor Taizong of the Tang Dynasty, Li Shimin, because they had some similarities, such as the surname Li and killing his brother to succeed to the throne. In addition, there were also people who believed that the Qing Emperor might be the prototype of Liu Yu because Liu Yu was the first emperor of the Southern Dynasty, and the Qing Emperor was also the Qing Emperor in the play. However, Maoni said in an interview that the Qing Emperor was a fictional character design and did not refer to any original form. Thus, there was no definite answer to the Qing Emperor's true form.
The Qing Emperor's prototype was Tang Taizong, Li Shimin.
There was no clear answer to the Qing Emperor's archetype in Joy of Life. Some people believed that the Qing Emperor might be the prototype of Emperor Taizong of the Tang Dynasty, Li Shimin, because they had some similarities, such as the surname Li and killing his brother to succeed to the throne. In addition, there were also people who believed that the Qing Emperor might be the prototype of Liu Yu because Liu Yu was the first emperor of the Southern Dynasty, and the Qing Emperor was also the Qing Emperor in the play. However, when Maoni chose the background of Joy of Life, he did not have a clear time point. Instead, he chose to create it in a fictional way, so Qing Kingdom did not have a prototype. Thus, there was currently no conclusive answer regarding the Qing Emperor's original form.
There was no clear answer to the Qing Emperor's original form. Some people believed that the Qing Emperor might be the prototype of Emperor Taizong of the Tang Dynasty, Li Shimin, because they had some similarities, such as the surname Li and killing his brother to succeed to the throne. In addition, there were also people who believed that the Qing Emperor might be the prototype of Liu Yu because Liu Yu was the first emperor of the Southern Dynasty, and the Qing Emperor was also the Qing Emperor in the play. However, these views were just personal guesses and there was no conclusive evidence to support them. Thus, there was no clear answer regarding the Qing Emperor's original form.
There was no clear answer to the Qing Emperor's archetype in Joy of Life. Some people believed that the Qing Emperor might be the prototype of Emperor Taizong of the Tang Dynasty, Li Shimin, because they had some similarities, such as the surname Li and killing his brother to succeed to the throne. In addition, there were also people who believed that the Qing Emperor might be the prototype of Liu Yu because Liu Yu was the first emperor of the Southern Dynasty, and the Qing Emperor was also the Qing Emperor in the play. However, when Maoni chose the background of Joy of Life, he did not have a clear time point. Instead, he chose to create it in a fictional way, so Qing Kingdom did not have a prototype. Thus, there was currently no conclusive answer regarding the Qing Emperor's original form.
There was still no clear answer to the Qing Emperor's original form. Some people believed that the Qing Emperor might be the prototype of Emperor Taizong of the Tang Dynasty, Li Shimin, while others believed that the Qing Emperor might be the prototype of Liu Yu. However, these views were just personal guesses and there was no conclusive evidence to support them. Thus, there was no clear answer regarding the Qing Emperor's original form.
The Qing Emperor's prototype might have been Emperor Taizong of the Tang Dynasty, Li Shimin. Some people believed that the Qing Emperor had some similarities with Li Shimin, such as the surname Li and killing his brother to succeed to the throne. However, these views were only speculations and personal interpretation of the audience. There was no conclusive evidence to support them. In addition, there were also people who believed that the Qing Emperor might be the prototype of Liu Yu because Liu Yu was the first emperor of the Southern Dynasty, and the Qing Emperor was also the Qing Emperor in the play. However, there was currently no definite answer to who the Qing Emperor's original form was. Therefore, the Qing Emperor's original form was still an unknown question.
There was no clear answer to the Qing Emperor's original form. Some people believed that the Qing Emperor might be the prototype of Emperor Taizong of the Tang Dynasty, Li Shimin, because they had some similarities, such as the surname Li and killing his brother to succeed to the throne. In addition, there were also people who believed that the Qing Emperor might be the prototype of Liu Yu because Liu Yu was the first emperor of the Southern Dynasty, and the Qing Emperor was also the Qing Emperor in the play. However, the Qing Emperor's original form was not clearly confirmed in the search results provided. Therefore, the Qing Emperor's original form was still an unsolved mystery.
There was no clear answer to the Qing Emperor's archetype in Joy of Life. Some people believed that the Qing Emperor might be the prototype of Emperor Taizong of the Tang Dynasty, Li Shimin, because they had some similarities, such as the surname Li and killing his brother to succeed to the throne. In addition, there were also people who believed that the Qing Emperor might be the prototype of Liu Yu because Liu Yu was the first emperor of the Southern Dynasty, and the Qing Emperor was also the Qing Emperor in the play. However, these views were just speculations and personal interpretation of the audience. There was no conclusive evidence to support them. Maoni also said in an interview that the Qing Emperor was a fictional character design and did not refer to any original form. Thus, there was no definite answer to who the Qing Emperor's original form was.
There was no clear answer to the Qing Emperor's original form. Some people believed that the Qing Emperor might be the prototype of Emperor Taizong of the Tang Dynasty, Li Shimin, because they had some similarities, such as the surname Li and killing his brother to succeed to the throne. In addition, there were also people who believed that the Qing Emperor might be the prototype of Liu Yu because Liu Yu was the first emperor of the Southern Dynasty, and the Qing Emperor was also the Qing Emperor in the play. However, these views were just speculations and personal interpretation of the audience. There was no conclusive evidence to support them. Thus, there was no definite answer to who the Qing Emperor's original form was.
There was no clear answer to the Qing Emperor's original form. Some people believed that the Qing Emperor might be the prototype of Emperor Taizong of the Tang Dynasty, Li Shimin, because they had some similarities, such as the surname Li and killing his brother to succeed to the throne. In addition, there were also people who believed that the Qing Emperor might be the prototype of Liu Yu because Liu Yu was the first emperor of the Southern Dynasty, and the Qing Emperor was also the Qing Emperor in the play. However, none of these views had been confirmed. Thus, the Qing Emperor's original form was still an unknown question.
There was no clear answer to the Qing Emperor's original form. Some people believed that the Qing Emperor might be the prototype of Emperor Taizong of the Tang Dynasty, Li Shimin, because they had some similarities, such as the surname Li and killing his brother to succeed to the throne. In addition, there were also people who believed that the Qing Emperor might be the prototype of Liu Yu because Liu Yu was the first emperor of the Southern Dynasty, and the Qing Emperor was also the Qing Emperor in the play. However, these views were just speculations and personal interpretation of the audience. There was no conclusive evidence to support them. Maoni also said in an interview that the Qing Emperor was a fictional character design and did not refer to any original form. Thus, there was no definite answer to who the Qing Emperor's original form was.