How did Echo lose her leg in the comics?
Echo's leg loss in the comics could be attributed to a combination of factors. Maybe there was a trap set by a villain, or it could be that she underestimated an opponent's strength. It's a complex situation that unfolded in the comic's storyline.
Well, from what I remember, it might have been a result of a powerful enemy's attack. Or perhaps it was a risky move she made to save someone and ended up losing her leg in the process.
Did Echo lose her leg in the comics?
Well, in the comics, Echo indeed lost her leg. This event had a significant impact on her character development and storyline.
Does Echo lose her leg in the comics?
No, she doesn't. Echo remains intact in the comics.
Did Echo have one leg in the comics?
No, Echo didn't have one leg in the comics.
Did Echo have a prosthetic leg in the comics?
Sure, Echo had a prosthetic leg in the comics. This feature often played a role in her storylines and interactions with other characters.
Did Hawkeye lose a leg in the comics?
No, Hawkeye didn't lose a leg in the comics.
Was Echo missing a leg in the comics?
Echo didn't have a leg missing in the comics. The character's physical condition was intact.
Did Hawkeye lose his leg in the comics?
Hawkeye did not lose his leg in the comics. This kind of major physical change didn't occur for him. The comic writers chose to keep his physical condition consistent without introducing such a significant alteration.
Does Echo have 1 leg in the comics?
No, Echo doesn't have just 1 leg in the comics. She's typically depicted with two fully functioning legs.
Is Echo an amputated leg character in comics?
No, Echo is not an amputated leg character in comics.
Does Echo have one leg in comics?
I don't think so. In the comics I know, Echo doesn't have one leg.