Did the LA Times forgive the non sequitur comic controversy?

Maybe it was due to controversial content or declining popularity.

It's hard to give a definite count. The number could vary depending on various factors like the comic's content, audience response, and the agencies' editorial policies.

I'm not sure exactly. It really depends on the specific field and the research being done.

The LA Times comic strips are known for their high-quality illustrations and engaging storylines. They often touch on contemporary issues and offer both entertainment and thought-provoking content. Some also have recurring characters that readers grow attached to.

It's likely not a common term. The LA Times uses more specific designations for its stories like 'feature story', 'investigative report', etc. 'la times long story' might be an ad - hoc or very specific reference to a particular piece that someone has given, rather than a standard term within the newspaper's lexicon.

I'm not sure. Maybe you can check the LA Times' entertainment section for any related coverage.

The LA Times comic section usually includes a variety of popular comic strips and graphic novels. It might feature both classic and contemporary comics, covering different genres like humor, adventure, and drama.

Well, it's difficult to tell. It might be a short blurb or a comprehensive analysis. It all depends on how significant the comic is considered by the LA Times editorial team.

I'm not sure. Maybe there was a story about traffic safety or community issues related to speed bumps.

The depiction of the argyle sweater in the comic could vary depending on the story's context and the artist's style. The LA Times coverage might offer more insights into its significance or popularity.