Merlin is definitely fictional. These stories about him have been passed down through generations and are part of imaginative folklore. There's no concrete historical evidence to suggest he was a real person.
In reality, Merlin is not a historical figure. The stories about him are more of a fantastical element in folklore and literature. They were created to entertain and inspire imagination rather than being based on actual events or people.
Merlin's story isn't real. It's a combination of myths and imagination passed down through generations. There's no historical evidence to prove its authenticity.
Merlin was a powerful wizard in Arthurian legend. He was said to be the advisor to King Arthur. He used his magic to help Arthur become king, for example, by creating the famous Sword in the Stone test. Merlin was born with special powers and his knowledge of magic was vast.
Magic is a main element. Merlin's magic was used for various things like helping Arthur get the throne. Another element is his role as an advisor. He gave Arthur wise counsel.
Li Muyu and Chen Can were characters in the novel " Cultivation Game ", which was a fictional story.
Vampires are fictional. They exist only in myths, legends, and works of fiction like books and movies.
Dracula is fictional. It's a creation of Bram Stoker's imagination and doesn't exist in reality.
The Mahabharata is a combination of both real and fictional elements. Some events and characters may have been based on historical or real-life inspirations, but there are also fantastical and mythical aspects that are clearly fictional.
It's fictional. Most stories are made up to entertain or convey a message.
I think it's fictional. It seems to have elements that are typical of made-up stories.