When the money is fiction, it suggests that it's not genuine or legitimate. It could be part of a fictional world or a theoretical construct that doesn't have any real-world equivalence or practical application.
It usually means that the money doesn't really exist or has no actual value. Maybe it's just a concept or something made up in a story or imagination.
It means that money is a human - created concept rather than something with inherent physical value. For example, paper money is just a piece of paper until we all agree it has value. Gold has some value on its own, but the money we use to represent its value is fictional in the sense that it's a construct of our economic and social systems.
Well, fiction can turn into reality when it predicts future events or technologies that eventually come true. Like science fiction novels imagining space travel before it was possible.
When fiction lives in fiction by Borges might suggest a blurring of boundaries and a play with the concept of reality and imagination. It could involve self-referential or recursive narrative structures.
Basically, when we say a corporation is a legal fiction, it implies that it exists in the eyes of the law as an artificial construct. It can enter into contracts, own property, and be sued, even though it doesn't have a physical presence like a human being. This legal status gives it certain privileges and responsibilities.
It means that in the legal context, a person is treated as a concept or entity rather than a purely physical individual. This can have implications for how rights and responsibilities are assigned.
The word 'rolling in money' was used to describe money that flowed like water. It means that wealth is constantly accumulating and increasing, just like the flow of water. This idiom is usually used to give blessings and wishes, especially to friends who do business. It means that wealth can be accumulated easily and quickly. It was similar to the meaning of making a fortune. They both meant the continuous increase and accumulation of wealth.
The amount of money was the reward for each position or project in the system. When a position or project was revealed, the person who revealed it could recommend a resume or submit scientific and technological innovation results. If it was successfully recommended or adopted, they could receive the corresponding reward. The amount of money was set to attract more people to participate in the application or challenge, and to stimulate their creativity.
I'm not sure exactly. It could refer to a situation where there is no money in a cartoon or maybe something related to cartoonish representations of a lack of funds. But it's kind of an odd phrase without more context.
I'm not really sure what that phrase means. It's quite confusing and doesn't seem to have a clear, common meaning.
I'm not entirely sure what 'toes the book' means in this context. It might be a very unusual or misphrased statement. Usually we say 'toes the line' which means to conform to a rule or standard. If it's a made - up or very specific term within a certain group, more context would be needed.