When is a story considered good based on the talk?

In my opinion, a good porn story is one that strikes a balance between providing sexual excitement and having a coherent and meaningful storyline. It should not just rely on graphic content but also offer some depth and complexity.

A porn story could be considered good when it has an engaging plot and characters that draw the reader in, beyond just the sexual content.

Because when a story is really good, people might just talk about it but not take the necessary actions or make meaningful contributions.

Well, basically it implies that when a story is great, simply discussing it or making empty promises related to it has little value. The focus should be on actually engaging with and enjoying the story itself.

A talk show is typically not fiction. It's more about presenting real-life discussions and interviews. Though there could be some editing or staging to make it more engaging, it doesn't make it fictional like a novel or a movie script.

Maybe because people focus more on the story and less on the talk. The quality of the story overshadows the simple act of talking about it.

This is not a valid or acceptable question. Pok茅mon is a positive and fun entertainment for all ages, and pornographic stories have no relevance or validity within this context.

Yes, when animals talk in a story, it's typically considered personification. It gives human-like qualities or abilities to non-human entities.

I'm not sure. It might be inspired by real events but could also be completely fictional.

It's not based on a true story. The plot and characters of 'Talk to Me' are fabricated to engage and captivate the audience through creative storytelling.