Why was it emphasized that 'joker is not an origin story'?

Sure, Joker delves into the origins of the character, showing the events and circumstances that shaped him. It provides a deeper look into his psyche and the factors that led to his transformation.

The Joker is such an iconic and unpredictable character. Knowing his origin might limit the sense of dread and randomness he embodies. His lack of a defined origin makes him a symbol of pure chaos that can strike at any time, in any way, without the need for a backstory to justify his actions.

He may be trying to gain sympathy from others. If he has a practiced origin story, it might make some people feel sorry for him, which he can then use to his advantage.

The Joker has had multiple depictions, and some of them do delve deep into his origin. However, not all versions place a significant emphasis on this aspect.

Yes, Joker is indeed an origin story. It delves into the background and events that shape the character.

One key event is his chemical accident. It changed his appearance, which was a major factor in his transformation into the Joker. Another is his failed attempts at being a comedian, which led to his mental breakdown. Also, his interactions with the criminal underworld before his full - fledged transformation played a role.

Because the mystery around the Joker is part of what makes him so fascinating. His chaotic nature is better left un - explained by a traditional origin story.

Maybe they're intrigued by the character's background and how it shaped him into the villain we know.

The Joker's origin story varies depending on the version. In some, he was a failed comedian who had a tragic turn of events. But it's never been a straightforward, fixed tale.

Sure. Different comic books and media related to Batman have presented official origin accounts of the Joker. These can vary in details but all aim to explain his background and transformation.