Are 'erotic lusty stories' considered appropriate literature?

No. Erotic content in general is not considered appropriate for mainstream literature as it goes against many moral and ethical values.

In general, no. Literature should aim to enlighten, educate, or at least be suitable for a wide range of readers. 'Erotic hitchhiker stories' that involve sexual elements are not appropriate for most audiences. There are different genres in literature like classic literature, science fiction, mystery, etc. that are more acceptable and have positive contributions to the literary field, while 'erotic hitchhiker stories' are not in that category.

No. Such stories often contain adult and inappropriate elements which go against moral and ethical standards in general literature.

Appropriate literature should be able to convey positive values, such as friendship, love in a healthy way, moral lessons, etc. Erotic stories do not fit into this category as they mainly focus on sexual arousal which is not suitable for general public consumption.

No, they are not. Mainstream literature generally adheres to certain moral and ethical standards, and such explicit content is not suitable for a wide audience.

No. Such stories often promote unethical behavior and objectify relationships in a sexual context, which goes against the values that good literature should uphold.

Definitely not. Mainstream literature is supposed to have a certain level of propriety. It's about stories that can be shared and discussed in various public and private settings without causing discomfort or violating social norms. Leather erotic stories, by their very nature, are not suitable for the general public. They are more of a form of adult - oriented or fetish - based writing that is restricted to specific audiences who are interested in such adult - themed content.

Hotwife erotic stories are far from what is considered suitable for mainstream literature. Mainstream literature aims to reach a wide audience, including children and families, and these stories with their sexual nature are not in line with that goal. They belong more to the realm of adult - only or niche erotica.

No. These types of stories are not appropriate as general literature because of their sexual nature. They are not suitable for a wide audience, especially children or in public settings.

In the realm of literature, we should promote works that celebrate the diversity of the gay community in a positive and respectful manner. Stories that are centered around 'erotic creampie' are not in line with the values of promoting healthy and inclusive literature for the gay community or for society as a whole.