Why did The New York Times ban cartoons?

It could be due to various reasons like concerns over potential controversy or a change in editorial policy.

The New York Times might have cut cartoons to make room for other types of content or because they weren't generating the expected audience engagement. It could also be part of a broader strategy to redefine their offerings.

It could be that they wanted to focus more on other forms of visual content or they faced budget constraints that led to cutting the cartoons section. There could be a variety of reasons.

Maybe it was due to budget cuts or a change in editorial direction. Who knows for sure?

Maybe it's due to changes in editorial policy or a shift in focus towards other forms of visual content.

The New York Times might have ended political cartoons due to various reasons. It could be related to shifting reader interests, a desire to reallocate resources, or a change in the perceived value and impact of such content.

Maybe it was a cost-cutting measure or they wanted to focus on other forms of visual content.

The New York Times might have stopped political cartoons to focus more on other forms of visual content or to avoid potential controversy. It could also be related to a reevaluation of the impact and reach of such cartoons in the current media landscape.

There could be several reasons. It might be that the readership wasn't that engaged with them, or there could have been legal or ethical concerns. Or perhaps they wanted to focus on other forms of visual content instead.

I don't think there should be any antisemitic cartoons in The New York Times. Such content is inappropriate and goes against principles of equality and respect.