Why do people fail at drawing cartoons?

Maybe they lack interesting plots or characters that don't appeal to the audience.

I think it might be because it adds drama and keeps viewers interested. It breaks the usual notion of cats always being successful and makes the story more unpredictable. Or perhaps it's to show that failure is a part of life, even for cats in cartoons.

Often, funny elevator cartoons fail because they lack creativity or fail to capture the unique aspects of the elevator setting. Also, the timing of the jokes might be off, making the whole thing fall flat.

Some New Yorker cartoons fail because they might be too obscure or not relatable to the common experiences of readers. Also, the art style could turn people off if it's not appealing.

Maybe it's because of the constant conflicts and misunderstandings between the characters. Their inability to communicate effectively makes it seem like the marriage has no chance.

Maybe it's because of the constant conflicts and misunderstandings between the characters that seem impossible to resolve.

It could be because the content might be seen as inappropriate or offensive. Maybe it doesn't meet certain moral or ethical standards for some.

Maybe because it's an unexpected and humorous contrast. People find it funny when something serious like engineering goes wrong in a cartoonish way.

Trade wars fail mainly due to the disruption of global supply chains. Political cartoons might illustrate how industries suffer and economies get destabilized. Also, they can cause diplomatic tensions that harm international relations.

It could be that the style or content of the dog and cat cartoons in The New Yorker doesn't appeal to the majority of readers. Maybe they lack originality or fail to convey a clear and engaging message.