webnovel
martha hart criticism

martha hart criticism

Martha Jordan

Martha Jordan

‘‘What in God’s name is happening’’ Martha asked as she properly wore Marcus’ jacket and rolled the sleeve till it was her arm’s length. ‘The thing I have been shielding everyone from’ I answered running a hand through my hair. ‘’And what is that?’’ she asked pulling off her shoes. ‘Nothing you need to know about Milky way’ I said to her. ‘’You did not just mean that! I almost just got hit right now Sir and you are still telling me I need not know?’’ she asked in a slightly elevated hushed tone. ‘I’ll explain it all to you but do you see that car over there’ I asked pointing towards my car and she nodded. ‘I am going to cover you and I want you to run as hard as you can. Do you hear me?’ I asked looking at her directly. ‘’You might not know this but I am a level four combatant now but my dad put a pause to my trainings because of my studies so the least I can do is run’’ she said with a shrug of her shoulders. ‘I know everything about you L4 combatant. On my count of three, you run’ I said as I pulled out an Akdal Ghost TR01 pistol from the back of my pants. ‘One Two…’ I started but she cut me off, ‘’don’t get hit Milky Way’’ she said and I chortled lightly, surprised that she was still worrying about me even though I put her in harm’s way only a couple of seconds ago and at the nickname she just reciprocated in calling me. ‘I’ll try. Three!’ I said and she started running while I side ran with her shooting at the direction the bullet came from the other time. Because I was running, the bullets fired back did not touch me at first but before I got to my car, I was shot in my arm. I opened the door of the car to get in and was expecting Martha to do same but that was when I turned back and saw it. Martha did not make it to the car, she was sprawled on the floor, in her red dress, with her blood flowing from her side.
Urban
64 Chs
MARTHA JORDAN

MARTHA JORDAN

Beginning: Main characters: Martha Jordan - the protagonist of the story. A girl who was abused and raped severally. She escapes her rapist and learns how to love again but the love is threatened by a secret organization who want her dead. Nathan Martin - Martha's love. A very handsome man who is one of the leading members of the biggest secret non governmental organization in the country. Supporting Characters: James Jordan: Martha's foster dad Michael Jordan: Martha's brother Seth Jordan: Martha's brother Lily Rudolph: Martha's best friend Gabriel Martin: Nathan's father The tragedic exit of Martha's parents and her going to her aunt's house where she was heavily maltreated by her aunt and constantly raped by her aunt's husband, Dr Matthew Stone. Development: When she turns nineteen, Dr Matthew tries to continue his assaukt but she musters up courage and fights with. During the fight, she ends up stabbing him and running away from the house. She enters the vehicle of a middle aged man, James Jordan, and escapes from that city. She starts living with James Jordan on his farm and saw him merely as a farmer and a man that distributes oil for heavy duty vehicles. Unknown to her, he works for a secret non governmental agency that protects civilians from government clashes and the snares of powerful men in the society. Crisis one: Martha is being looked for in the whole country for attempting to murder Dr Matthew. James Jordan gets to know and with the help of his organization, protects her. They take up the court case and they win the case. She meets a member of the organization who falls in love with her. He is about to begin a relationship with her when the organization faces a big threat. Crisis two: A rival organization is out for them because they have been countering a lot of their attacks. They begin to kill some members of the organization and also want to kill Martha without her knowledge. The man who loves her and who she loves is known as Nathan, Nathan Martin. He leaves the country without telling her to protect her and to gather information about this rival group but he doesn't know the extent to which Martha is in love with him. s Crisis three: She is in college and her best friend happens to be a forced member of the rival organization who was asked to watch her every move. Nathan tried to discover who these hidden forces are, that are against his organization. He discovers them and comes back to the country to be closer to Martha but it seems she is in love with someone else. Climax: Martha finds out that that the organization that helped her and that she works for is under attack from a rival organization. She also discovers that her best friend is a part of that organization. She feels betrayed by everyone and decided to go on a solo hunt. She discovers some things but she is kidnapped. A war breaks out between both rival groups that takes the life of her Savior and foster father, James Jordan. They win the war but the scar of James' exit, stays fresh in her memory. Ending: Nathan gives her time to recuperate from her loss before he confesses his love to her. She tells him and they are both extremely happy on the turn out of things.
Urban
32 Chs
Analysis of the 'Martha Martha' Short Story
I haven't read the 'Martha Martha' short story specifically. But generally, when analyzing a short story, we can start from aspects like the characters. Maybe Martha is the main character and we can look at her personality traits, her goals and desires. Another aspect could be the plot. Is it a linear plot or does it have flashbacks? For example, if it's about Martha's journey, whether it has a clear beginning, middle and end in terms of her experiences.
2 answers
2024-11-13 05:25
The Method of Literature Criticism-The Method of Literature Criticism-
Literature criticism is a method of evaluating and analyzing literary works. In literary criticism, the critics would analyze and evaluate the language, structure, theme, style, etc. of the literary works to reveal the meaning and extension of the works. Common literary criticism methods included: 1. structural criticism: analyze the plot, characters, clues and other structural elements of the work to reveal the internal logic and narrative rules of the work. 2. Language criticism: study the language, vocabulary, grammar, rhetoric and other aspects of the work to reveal the language art and language style of the work. 3. Thematic criticism: analyze the theme, emotions, thoughts, and other elements of the work to reveal the social and cultural background of the work and the author's ideology. 4. Style criticism: analyze the narrative style, description style, structure style and other style elements of the work to reveal the creative style of the work. 5. Accepting criticism: analyzing the process of acceptance of literary works to explore the readers 'acceptance and feelings of the works. 6. Comparative criticism: By comparing and analyzing the literary works of different works, different eras, and different schools, it reveals the differences and similarities between the works. The choice of literary criticism method depends on the research interest of the critics, the object of criticism, and the purpose and content of the criticism. Through the comprehensive application of a variety of critical methods, we can more comprehensively and deeply reveal the meaning and extension of the works and improve the ability to understand and evaluate literary works.
1 answer
2024-09-11 15:20
The difference between literary criticism and literary criticism.
Literature criticism and literary criticism were both ways of evaluating and analyzing literary works, but the focus and perspective were slightly different. Literature criticism refers to the subjective evaluation and analysis of literary works, mainly focusing on the characteristics and contents of literary works in terms of ideology, art, culture, etc., emphasizing the interpretation and understanding of the works themselves. Critists would use various methods such as reading, thinking, discussion, and analysis to conduct in-depth exploration and evaluation of works. Literature criticism, on the other hand, paid more attention to the analysis of the social, historical, and cultural background of literary works, as well as the author's intention, purpose, and creative process. The criticism mainly focused on the meaning, value, and influence of the work, emphasizing the evaluation of the relationship between the work and the era, society, history, and culture. Critiques tended to focus on being objective and fair, avoiding the interference of subjective colors. Therefore, the main difference between literary criticism and literary criticism lies in the focus of evaluation and analysis. One is the interpretation and understanding of the work itself, and the other is the evaluation of the relationship between the work and the times, society, and culture.
1 answer
2024-09-11 15:45
What was literary criticism? What was self-criticism?
Literature criticism refers to the critical analysis of literary works to reveal their social, political, cultural and other aspects of value and significance. The purpose of literary criticism was to criticize reality and promote the development and progress of literature. Self-criticism refers to a person's reflection and evaluation of his own thoughts and actions to discover his own weaknesses and shortcomings and strive to improve himself. Self-criticism is an important psychological mechanism that can help people better understand themselves and improve their self-awareness and self-control.
1 answer
2025-03-07 05:02
The difference between literary criticism and literary criticism.
Both literary criticism and literary criticism are methods of evaluating and analyzing literary works, but their focus and purpose are slightly different. Literature criticism refers to the study and analysis of literary works to reveal their intrinsic nature and meaning. Critists would pay attention to the historical background of the work, the author's background, the era background of the work, the theme of the work, the plot, the character creation, the use of language, and so on. Through analysis and interpretation of the work, they would explore the meaning and value of the work. The purpose of criticism is to reveal the essence and meaning of literary works and help readers better understand them. Literature criticism focused more on the appreciation and interpretation of literary works, emphasizing the readers 'subjective feelings and understanding and appreciation of the works. Reviewers would pay attention to the plot, character creation, language usage, theme, and other aspects of the work. Through their comments and analysis of the work, they would show the author's writing skills and style to explore the influence and significance of the work. The purpose of reviews was to let readers appreciate the works better and promote readers 'understanding and appreciation of literary works. Although literary criticism and literary criticism overlap in some aspects, their focus and purpose are different, so their expressions and methods are also different.
1 answer
2025-03-10 17:07
What is the story behind Martha Kent and Martha Wayne?
Martha Kent is Clark Kent's (Superman's) adoptive mother, known for her love and support. Martha Wayne was Bruce Wayne's (Batman's) mother, tragically killed in an alley, which shaped Bruce's path. Their stories are different but both have significant influence on their sons' lives.
1 answer
2024-10-04 06:35
Where is Pam from in the short story 'Martha Martha'?
Well, the story doesn't give a clear indication of where Pam is from. Maybe the author wanted to leave it up to our imagination.
2 answers
2024-10-06 11:01
What are the main events in the 'Martha Martha' short story?
Perhaps in the 'Martha Martha' short story, there are events related to Martha's relationships. Maybe she meets a new person who has a big impact on her life, like a new friend or a love interest. This could lead to a series of events such as going on adventures together or having conflicts because of different opinions.
2 answers
2024-11-13 09:46
Lu Xun's literary criticism objected to criticism that was based on facts and what kind of criticism it was.
Lu Xun's literary criticism advocated against the criticism of facts and metaphysics. Fact-based criticism refers to a specific analysis and description of the shortcomings or shortcomings of a specific work or character, not involving the overall evaluation of the work or character. Metaphysical criticism, on the other hand, refers to the general evaluation of works or characters from one-sided and isolated problems without specific analysis and practical basis. Lu Xun believed that the matter-of-fact-style criticism was easy to fall into trivial details and could not dig into the inner meaning and value of the works; while the metaphysical criticism was easy to ignore the overall background and context of the works or characters, resulting in a one-sided understanding and evaluation of the works or characters. Therefore, Lu Xun advocated a comprehensive, comprehensive, and in-depth criticism of works or characters, opposing a single, partial criticism.
1 answer
2024-09-10 13:51
Criticism of historical fiction: What are the common points of criticism?
One common point of criticism is historical inaccuracy. Some historical fictions may distort facts for the sake of a more exciting plot. For example, they might misinterpret the motives of historical figures or change the sequence of historical events. Another criticism is anachronistic language or behavior. If the characters in a historical novel use modern slang or display modern values that are out of place in the historical context, it can be off - putting to readers who expect authenticity.
2 answers
2024-12-13 19:51
a
b
c
d
e
f
g
h
i
j
k
l
m
n
o
p
q
r
s
t
u
v
w
x
y
z