analogy reasoning

[Happy: Sorrow is a kind of reasoning by analogy. Analogy is the process of reasoning based on the fact that two or two types of things have certain attributes that are the same or similar, and you can infer that they also have the same attributes.] In this analogy, happiness and sadness were the antonyms of emotional states, similar to the relationship between strength and weakness. The analogy between Happy and Sad was A. Oasis and Desert. 

The analogy between approval, review, and declaration was to declare first, then review, and finally approve. There was a time sequence for these three steps, and approval was the result of the review. This relationship could be compared to other situations with similar orders, such as the order of cutting and washing vegetables in cooking, and the order of walking and crawling in running. Under these circumstances, he would first proceed with the first step, then proceed with the second step, and finally reach his goal.

Looking left and right was a kind of analogy. In this idiom, looking left and looking right, left and right were antonyms, and Gu and Pan were synonymous. Analogy reasoning was a process of reasoning by comparing the similarities or similarities between two objects in certain attributes and deducing that they were the same in other attributes. In the process of looking left and right, the relationship between the left and right antonyms and the near-antonyms of looking matched the antonymy of the upper and lower. Therefore, looking left and right could be seen as a kind of analogy.

The fire alarm analogy reasoning was a type of analogy reasoning question. In this question, we need to infer the relationship of another group of words based on a given relationship. We can see that there is an analogy between "emergency" and "fire alarm" in the question. Among them," Urgent " meant extremely urgent, and " Fire " meant a fire alarm. According to the principle of analogy, we can infer the relationship between another group of words. However, the search results provided did not give the relationship between the other set of words, so it was impossible to determine the analogy of the fire alarm.

The relationship between uncle and nephew is a kind of blood relationship. According to the information provided, we can conclude that there is a species relationship between uncle and nephew and blood relationship. To be specific, uncle and nephew were a specific type of blood relationship.

Traveling from the south to the north could be used to describe the bustling scene of pedestrians and carriages coming and going. Analogy was a way of reasoning. It was to compare the relationship between two sets of things to find similarities. From the south to the north: lively, similar to beautiful mountains and rivers: scenery. The meaning of this sentence was that the scene and lively atmosphere of the south and north were similar to the beautiful scenery of the mountains and rivers.

The 2019 National Examination Literature General Knowledge Analogy Reasoning solution is as follows: 1. Understand the question requirement: The question requires us to solve the answer by analogy. Therefore, we need to understand the similarities and differences between the two things given by the question. 2. Search for key information: We need to get useful information from the question, such as what two things are, what are their similarities, and what are their differences. This information can help us make analogies. 3. Establishing a connection: We need to establish a connection between two things through analogy. For example, we can connect certain characteristics of two things or combine different parts of them to get an answer. Test the answer: Finally, we need to test the answer to see if we have reasonably established the connection and inferred the answer. In the process of doing the questions, we need to pay attention to details such as the similarities and differences between two things, whether we have established a reasonable connection, and so on. At the same time, we can also use some techniques to improve the accuracy of analogy reasoning, such as using the similarity of the analogy to infer, using the conclusion of the analogy to infer the specific content of the conclusion, and so on.

Qin, Go, Calligraphy, and Painting were questions of analogy. The zither in zither, chess, calligraphy, and painting referred to the zither, while the chess referred to the game of Go. There was a corresponding relationship between the two. Therefore, the answer was Go.

People gathering and chickens and dogs hearing each other could be used to describe a prosperous scene, because they referred to a densely populated situation. Based on the information provided, we can infer that there is a relationship between the convergence of people and the prosperity of the city. Out of the options given, only option A," rarely visited: deserted," had a similar meaning to desolation, so option A was the correct answer.

Illness comes from the mouth, and disaster comes from the mouth. It meant that diseases were mostly caused by food, while disasters were often caused by careless words. These two idioms did not have a direct relationship, but they could be understood by splitting the idiom. Among them,"illness" and "disaster" were parallel,"from the mouth" and "from the mouth" were opposites. This analogy could be used to emphasize the importance of food hygiene and caution in words.