Maple - Profile

“Dying” to complete the connection. That makes a lot of sense. In canon, this “legend” was never really realized, hence the “nothing happened”. "Dying" was the secret condition after gathering the artifacts. This would also explain why no one was able to become the master of death before him. The condition of death is unrealistic for mortals. Probably a way for the God of Death to give mortals a false hope of mastering him. But Harry completed this hidden condition by dying...and coming back to life in another world. But contrary to what other comments suggest, I don't actually think that the deaths added by the multidimensional phenomenon influenced the process. Death is infinite. It's a concept, not something quantifiable. We don't add up deaths to get an effect. It was enough to obtain an “experience” of death without ceasing to “live”. And only reincarnation can help a mortal in this sense.

Your translation is not bad at all although there is still a lot of Chinese logic in the text that you should rework. As for the fact that Constantine is so attached to Hermione when he was so individualistic before... It's a bit of a shame for the development of the character who is suddenly contaminated by the personal desires of the author. That's the problem with amateur writers, they are incapable of controlling themselves..

No way. This comment does not go in that direction. I'm just saying that a story that isn't a "romance" hasn't revolved around romance. These are often invasive elements in fanfics that end up devouring more and more scenes to the point that we only see that. The reason being that when fanfic authors start with their MC's romance, they are unable to stop and practically neglect the rest of the story. I've seen this happen too many times to not get annoyed by it after a while. If we can push the romance back as far as possible or make it only a minor element in the story, the fanfic will remain qualitative.

Hermione saw the madness in Lily. We really shouldn't trust the author when he portrays her as rational. Project Athena seems to have destroyed her moral compass. She became a full-blown sociopath. And she is obsessed with Harry but not for the good reasons I fear.

You can't make a single comment without an insult, eh ! And I see that you are already starting to distort my arguments since you claim that I deny the presence of romance in the story. If you took the trouble to “properly” reread my comments, you would realize that I just said that a tag does not determine the overall content of a story, it only represents part of the themes covered. That's why I said at the beginning that the story didn't necessarily have to focus on a hypothetical love story and that that was clearly not the direction the story was taking at the moment. But obviously, that wouldn't serve your vision in which you're right and I'm wrong. Maybe it's time to admit your faults, no ? The simple fact that you can't move on from your insults proves that you don't really have a point. After all, one only resort to violence when they have nothing else to say.

It seems to me that you are the one who does not admit your wrongs. You were the first to start this argument between us. So yes, you started it. And you instantly looked for conflict from the first exchange while I try to remain neutral in my answers. You use emojis to try to minimize your aggression in each response, but that only makes it more obvious. I can see how you don't like being answered bluntly and being proven wrong. I've already told you my point of view regarding the romance part but it's like you're ignoring it. Probably because you don't want to acknowledge any of my points. I'm still waiting to see you present a solid argument on the basic debate but you seem more interested in creating conflict with me. Now that I think about it, isn't that how trolls operate ? They create meaningless conflicts, often by denigrating the opinions of others and making the conversation loop but never presenting solid points. The goal is simply to fuel the argument. And they usually use a lot of emojis.

In fact, between us, "yes", it was you who started all this. And where exactly was I proven wrong ? I remember giving a solid response to your reaction. You, on the other hand, didn't really debate behind it. Maybe this all happened in your head since it's not in our discussions.

Are you kidding me ? You were the one who started yapping at me first. Just admit that you didn’t like my answer. The nerve !