an example or an argument that is more important to a journalist than ethics.

This question involved the difference between a metaphor and an example. Metaphorical argument was a way of comparing two or more things to reach a conclusion. The key to a figurative argument was that there was a certain similarity or contrast between the thing being argued and the thing being argued. For example, in the sentence " green is taken from blue and is more blue than blue ", the words " green " and " blue " were figurative, meaning that green was extracted from blue grass, but the color of green was darker than blue. Demonstrating with examples was to use specific examples to support the argument. The things in the examples should be real, concrete, and representative examples, not abstract concepts or analogies. For example," He studied hard and finally achieved excellent results " was an example to prove the importance of " diligence " to success in learning. In the sentence "blue is taken from blue and blue is blue", the "blue" and "blue" are a metaphor. It draws a conclusion by comparing the similarities between two things. Although this example itself was a way of argument, it was not an example because it did not provide specific examples to support the point.

For a journalist, good writing and good thinking were very important. Writing style refers to the ability of a journalist to write in terms of language, structure, and style. A good writing style could help readers understand the news better and increase the attractiveness and legibility of the news. At the same time, good writing could also improve the writing ability of journalists and lay a good foundation for future work. Thinking referred to a journalist's ability to think and reason when interviewing, analyzing, and writing. A good way of thinking could help journalists analyze problems, understand facts, and accurately express their opinions. At the same time, good thinking could also improve the depth and breadth of a journalist's thinking, providing more possibilities for the future development of the news industry. Therefore, a journalist needed to pay attention to both writing style and thinking. Only when one's writing and thinking reached a certain level could one write valuable news articles to provide useful information to readers.

It was a widely accepted view in the news industry that ethics were more important than professional quality. News ethics referred to the norms and principles that journalists followed in news reporting, including honesty, fairness, objectively, responsibility, etc. These ethics not only helped to maintain the image of the news industry, but also guaranteed the public's trust in news information. In contrast, professional quality usually referred to the ability of journalists in terms of professional skills and knowledge. For example, a journalist with rich news experience might be better at interviewing, writing, editing, and other basic skills, but might lack relevant professional knowledge such as politics, economics, culture, and so on. Therefore, the importance of news ethics was self-evident. A journalist should always abide by ethics to ensure the fairness and objectiveness of news reports so as to enhance public trust in the news. At the same time, professional quality was also one of the necessary abilities for journalists to help them better complete the task of news reporting. In practice, news organizations usually train journalists on ethics and professional qualities to ensure the quality and fairness of news reports. Therefore, it was reasonable to argue that the ethics of journalists were more important than professional quality.

Demonstrating with examples: Using concrete examples to support an argument makes it easier for the reader to understand and accept the argument. The role of examples is to let the reader have a deeper understanding of the argument and be able to support the argument better. Reasoning: Supporting an argument by stating a reason so that the reader understands the reason and reason for the argument. The purpose of reasoning was to make the reader understand the argument and better understand its importance. Metaphorical argument: Using a metaphor to express an argument so that the reader can understand the argument more easily. The function of figurative argument is to make the reader have a deeper understanding of the argument and can better support the argument. Comparisons: By comparing the differences, the reader can highlight the importance of the argument. The purpose of the comparison argument is to make the reader more aware of the importance of the argument and to better understand the advantages and disadvantages of the argument.

Competition and cooperation were both important in life. There was no absolute contradiction between the two. Competition can stimulate people's creativity and innovation, and encourage people to constantly improve their abilities in their respective fields. At the same time, competition could also encourage people to learn from each other and improve together through cooperation. In the competitive modern society, we need to have keen insight and flexible response strategies to stand out in the fierce competition. Cooperation allowed people to help and support each other to achieve greater success with a common goal. In teamwork, people could use their own strengths to complete a task together to achieve better results. In addition, cooperation could also promote the development and progress of society and create more value for human society. We have seen many successful examples in modern society. For example, many successful companies in the technology field relied on teamwork. In the business world, many successful companies achieved success through teamwork. In addition, many outstanding students in the field of education also achieved their goals through teamwork. Therefore, we believe that competition and cooperation are both important in life. On the road of fierce competition in life, we need to have keen insight and flexible response strategies to stand out in the fierce competition; on the road of cooperation, we need to learn to cooperate and play our respective advantages to complete a task together to achieve greater success.

The most important function of news work was to spread information and promote social progress. Through collecting, editing, and publishing news works to report important events and progress at home and abroad, we can transmit information such as government policies, social customs, and cultural customs to provide the public with objective, accurate, and timely news information to guide public opinion and promote social development and change.

The argument that a senior was more suitable as a boyfriend than a junior could be developed around the following aspects: 1. More experience: Seniors usually have more life experience and emotional experience than juniors. They can better understand and take care of juniors. 2. Know how to care more: Seniors can give more care and support to juniors in a more meticulous way to make juniors feel valued and cared for. 3. More responsible: Before becoming a boyfriend, the senior has already gone through a certain amount of social and life experience, and can take on his own responsibility to provide safe and reliable support for the junior. 4. It is easier to establish intimate relationships: Seniors are usually more mature and stable than juniors, and it is easier to establish close interpersonal relationships with juniors to share life experiences and emotions. The above aspects can be used as the basis of arguments and combined with specific situations to expand. For example, in the novel, a junior can meet an older senior who gradually becomes the junior's boyfriend. Through his actions and words, the junior can feel the care and support of the senior, and finally establish a deep relationship.

Well, start by having a clear point you want to make. Build your characters' perspectives and motivations around that. Use dialogue and inner thoughts to express the different sides of the argument.

Often, a caricature uses symbolic colors and bold lines for emphasis. Say, a red face to show anger. Also, the pose or action of the character can be an argument, like someone with arms crossed looking stubborn.

An argument by metaphor can be either an argument of fact or an argument of reason, depending on the specific content of the metaphor used. In some cases, figurative arguments are used to prove that an idea or argument is based on facts because there is indeed some similarity between the thing and the idea. This kind of argument is called a fact argument because it proves that the point or argument is based on real facts. For example, if someone says," The sun is red," then the argument is based on fact, because there are many animals that have visual reactions when they see the sun, and these reactions are similar to the characteristics of red. On the other hand, figurative argument can also be used to prove that an idea or argument is reasonable because there is some similarity between the thing and the idea. This kind of argument is called a reasoning argument because it proves that the point or argument is based on correct reasoning and logical reasoning. For example, if someone said," The apple is a fighter among fruits," then this metaphor was reasonable because it proved that the apple had unique characteristics and advantages among fruits. Thus, a figurative argument can be either an argument of fact or an argument of reason. It depends on the specific content of the metaphor used and the nature of the point or argument being proved.