Is a metaphor an argument of fact or an argument of reason?

An argument by metaphor can be either an argument of fact or an argument of reason, depending on the specific content of the metaphor used. In some cases, figurative arguments are used to prove that an idea or argument is based on facts because there is indeed some similarity between the thing and the idea. This kind of argument is called a fact argument because it proves that the point or argument is based on real facts. For example, if someone says," The sun is red," then the argument is based on fact, because there are many animals that have visual reactions when they see the sun, and these reactions are similar to the characteristics of red. On the other hand, figurative argument can also be used to prove that an idea or argument is reasonable because there is some similarity between the thing and the idea. This kind of argument is called a reasoning argument because it proves that the point or argument is based on correct reasoning and logical reasoning. For example, if someone said," The apple is a fighter among fruits," then this metaphor was reasonable because it proved that the apple had unique characteristics and advantages among fruits. Thus, a figurative argument can be either an argument of fact or an argument of reason. It depends on the specific content of the metaphor used and the nature of the point or argument being proved.

Metaphorical argument is a rhetorical device that uses an analogy of one thing to strengthen an argument. In a figurative argument, the noumenon and the metaphor establish an image of a connection, which often makes it easier for people to understand and accept the argument. There are a few points to note when writing a metaphor: A metaphor should accurately grasp the characteristics of the noumenon and the metaphor to make an accurate metaphor. 2. Metaphorical sentences should use vivid language as much as possible to make the reader feel the image brought by the metaphor. Figurative sentences should conform to rhetorical rules to avoid using inappropriate metaphor to cause misunderstanding. Therefore, when writing a metaphor, one should pay attention to the accuracy, image, and propriety of the metaphor in order to better strengthen the effect of the argument.

This question involved the difference between a metaphor and an example. Metaphorical argument was a way of comparing two or more things to reach a conclusion. The key to a figurative argument was that there was a certain similarity or contrast between the thing being argued and the thing being argued. For example, in the sentence " green is taken from blue and is more blue than blue ", the words " green " and " blue " were figurative, meaning that green was extracted from blue grass, but the color of green was darker than blue. Demonstrating with examples was to use specific examples to support the argument. The things in the examples should be real, concrete, and representative examples, not abstract concepts or analogies. For example," He studied hard and finally achieved excellent results " was an example to prove the importance of " diligence " to success in learning. In the sentence "blue is taken from blue and blue is blue", the "blue" and "blue" are a metaphor. It draws a conclusion by comparing the similarities between two things. Although this example itself was a way of argument, it was not an example because it did not provide specific examples to support the point.

Demonstrating with examples: Using concrete examples to support an argument makes it easier for the reader to understand and accept the argument. The role of examples is to let the reader have a deeper understanding of the argument and be able to support the argument better. Reasoning: Supporting an argument by stating a reason so that the reader understands the reason and reason for the argument. The purpose of reasoning was to make the reader understand the argument and better understand its importance. Metaphorical argument: Using a metaphor to express an argument so that the reader can understand the argument more easily. The function of figurative argument is to make the reader have a deeper understanding of the argument and can better support the argument. Comparisons: By comparing the differences, the reader can highlight the importance of the argument. The purpose of the comparison argument is to make the reader more aware of the importance of the argument and to better understand the advantages and disadvantages of the argument.

Frustration refers to the process or result of encountering difficulties, obstacles, or failures in certain situations. Here are some facts about the setback: Frustration is an important factor in growth. Experiencing setbacks can help people learn to adapt to change, face difficulties, and learn from them. This kind of growth and adaptability helps people succeed in life. Frustration can help people develop new skills and talents. When people encounter setbacks, they may try to use different strategies and skills to solve the problem. These new experiences and skills could help people develop new talents and skills to better cope with future challenges. Frustration can motivate people to work harder. When people encounter setbacks, they may feel lost and depressed, but they may also be motivated to work harder to overcome difficulties. This positive attitude can help people achieve greater success in life. Frustration can promote people's growth and progress. Frustration is a kind of challenge. By challenging people's ability and courage, it can promote people's growth and progress. In this process, people might learn more knowledge and skills to better cope with future challenges. Frustration can affect people's emotions and health. When people encounter setbacks, they may feel depressed, anxious, angry, and so on. These emotions may affect people's physical and mental health, leading to stress and psychological problems. Therefore, setbacks had an important impact on people's emotions and health.

Frustration is an experience that can make us stronger, more mature, and wiser. Here are some facts about the setback: Frustration is an opportunity for growth: Frustration allows us to learn from failure, grow and improve ourselves. When we encounter setbacks, we can learn from them and adjust our thinking and methods to better deal with future challenges. 2. Frustration can enhance perseverance: Frustration can make us more determined to pursue our goals because we know that it takes effort and patience to achieve them. Such perseverance and determination can motivate us to work harder to overcome all kinds of difficulties and obstacles. 3. Frustration can shape character: Frustration can make us learn how to deal with difficulties and challenges, and become more decisive, tenacious, and confident. These qualities can influence the way we interact with others and shape our character and values. Sometimes setbacks can bring opportunities. When we encounter setbacks, we can re-examine our lives and goals and discover new opportunities and possibilities. This change can make us more confident and proactive in meeting future challenges. Frustration can stimulate creativity: Frustration can make us more open and flexible, and our creativity and innovation ability can also be improved. When we encounter setbacks, we can look for new ideas and methods to propose new ideas and solutions.

One possible reason could be a difference in their values. Naruto, from the Naruto series, values loyalty and hard - work above all. Barbara, perhaps from a different fictional universe, might value something else like purity or grace. Their different upbringings and the worlds they come from could also contribute. For example, Naruto grew up in a world full of ninja battles and had to fight for his place. Barbara might come from a more peaceful or magically - inclined world. When their paths cross, these differences in values and backgrounds could lead to an argument.

Metaphorical reasoning was a way to better understand and prove a concept or argument by comparing it to a specific entity or object. The argument that new achievements can only be achieved by breaking the old rules that hinder progress can be argued with the following metaphor: It's like a bridge, its rudeness, its sturdy shell that limits our steps. Only by breaking these old rules can we break through the obstacles and move forward into new fields. It's like a bridge, its rudeness, its sturdy shell that limits our steps. Only by breaking these old rules can we break through the obstacles and move forward into new fields. In this metaphor, the bridge represents the factor that hinders our progress, and the shell of the old rules represents the existence of these old rules. Extending this metaphor further can be seen as an old limitation that limits our development just like the old rules. Only by breaking these old rules can we open up new fields and achieve greater achievements. Therefore, only by breaking the old rules that hinder progress can we move forward and succeed. This metaphor can help us better understand this point of view and inspire us to bravely challenge our comfort zones, explore new areas, and achieve greater achievements.

Fortress Besieged Theory refers to the point of view mentioned in Fortress Besieged, that is, the people inside the wall and the people outside the wall have their own dreams and pursuits, but reality often can't meet everyone's needs and expectations. This argument emphasized the gap between reality and ideals and also revealed the cruelty and injustice of society.

Yes, it can. Sometimes an argument can have a beginning, middle, and end, with characters and conflicts, similar to a story.