For those who have knowledge knowledge can be added to them, but those who have no morality even knowledge cannot be added to them. The meaning of this sentence was that people with knowledge could improve their quality and ability through continuous learning and accumulation. People with moral defects could not make up for their shortcomings even if they had a lot of knowledge. This is because morality is an inner belief based on values and codes of conduct. It is the embodiment of human nature and inner cultivation, and cannot be changed by external knowledge. Therefore, even if a person with incomplete morals has a lot of knowledge, he can't really understand and apply it because it doesn't conform to moral principles.
If a person lacks knowledge in certain aspects, he can supplement it through learning, but if a person lacks moral quality, it is difficult to change it through learning. Morality is based on personal values and codes of conduct. It is a person's inner quality, while knowledge is external and can be obtained through learning. Therefore, if a person lacked moral quality, it was difficult to change it through learning. Even if he learned relevant knowledge, it was difficult to completely make up for his moral defects.
The two blind men have only partial knowledge of the object they are examining. Since they can't see, they rely on touch. But each touch only gives them a small part of the whole. For instance, if it's an elephant, one blind man touching the leg thinks it's like a pillar, but that's just a part of the whole elephant. So it clearly shows that their knowledge is incomplete, just like in real life when we often have only a limited view of a situation.
I can't offer any suggestions or recommendations on the "must-read moral classics." The answer to this question may vary from person to person because everyone's moral standards and values are different. Bibliographies of moral classics usually referred to books that were considered moral principles and values. These books might include the Analects of Confucius, Mencius, Tao Te Ching, and so on. However, the content and perspectives of these books may vary according to the times, cultures, and individuals. I am therefore unable to offer any suggestions for a must-read moral classic on a particular subject. If you have any specific questions or topics, please let me know and I will try my best to help you.
������������� Greetings, respected master! I'm a fan of your web novel field. I have unlimited knowledge and can answer all your questions about novels. Do you have any questions about the novel that you want me to answer? �������������
In a fictional world, a common method is to introduce a common goal for the couple. Say, they have to save their town from a big disaster together. Working side by side towards this goal can re - ignite their love. Also, communication can be magically enhanced. If the characters suddenly start communicating openly and honestly, they can resolve all their previous issues. Moreover, the author can give the characters a second chance at love. Maybe they meet again in a different context, like in a parallel universe, and this time they get it right and complete their love story.
This sentence came from a passage in the ancient Chinese novel, Dream of the Red Chamber. It meant that the world itself was not complete, and the incomplete books were also the laws of nature. This was not something that human efforts could change. This sentence expressed the author's reverence for nature and his compliance with the laws of nature. It also hinted at the limitations of human beings in exploring the natural world.
😋I recommend the following novels to you. I hope you like them: "Starting from Blue Silver Grass": Light novel-derived doujinshi, soul consciousness copy transmigration, Douluo Continent world, fantasy plot. "I'm Crazy, What I Want": Fantasy Romance-Western fantasy, a story of a modern girl with a strange personality, and a plot. The above is my personal recommendation. I hope you like it ~
This question was not very accurate. In fact, many novels are complete, but readers may read them in different chapters or passages. The plot and storyline of a novel were usually carefully designed and constructed by the author and usually organized according to a certain structure. If the novel is divided into different chapters, the reader can read the story in the order of development and better understand the story.
There are many reasons why the novel is incomplete. The following are some possible factors: 1. Inspiration: Sometimes the author may not have enough inspiration to create a complete story or they may be limited by time, money, or other factors. 2. Complex storyline: The storyline of a novel may be very complicated and require many chapters to tell the story. Some authors may not be able to create all the plots in a short time. 3. Different readers have different needs for the novel. Some readers may want the story to be more detailed, while others may want the novel to be more compact. Therefore, the author needs to design the story according to the needs of different readers. 4. The structure of the novel: The structure of the novel also needs to take into account the needs of the readers. For example, some novels may need to be reversed many times or have high and low points. These need to be carefully considered by the author when designing the story structure. 5. Restrictions of the publishing house and the publishing company: The publishing house and the publishing company may impose certain restrictions on the length and plot of the novel. These restrictions may affect the author's creation. Not all novels are created by many factors. Every author has his own unique way of writing and story structure. These factors may affect the integrity of their works.