In the debate, we are the opposing side. The topic of debate is more likely to be affected by emotional factors. Help me find some information.

College students participating in volunteer activities focused on training. On the contrary, it could be argued that college students participating in volunteer activities could not directly train their personal abilities, but might waste time and resources. Here are some possible counterarguments: 1. volunteer activities may affect college students 'studies. If college students participated in volunteer activities too frequently, it might take up their time and cause them to be unable to concentrate on their studies. Moreover, volunteer activities usually required a long time to participate in, which would have a certain negative impact on the health of college students. 2. volunteer activities do not provide practical work experience for college students. Although volunteer activities could cultivate college students 'sense of social responsibility and teamwork, these experiences could not be directly converted into professional experience. For most college students, their main goal was to find a job after graduation. Therefore, volunteer activities were not a necessary step in their career planning. 3. volunteer activities can't improve the academic performance of college students. Although volunteer activities can help students build a good sense of community and social responsibility, they can't directly improve students 'academic performance. Many college students participate in volunteer activities to find a better job after graduation rather than to enrich their studies. 4. The voluntary activities can't improve the professional skills of college students. Although volunteer activities can help students develop their leadership and teamwork skills, they cannot directly improve their professional skills. For many college students, they need to learn professional knowledge in school in order to find a better job after graduation. Therefore, volunteer activities were not a necessary step for them to improve their skills.

The opposing side's second defense is very grateful for the free debate question you provided. Here are some possible questions for your reference: Is it necessary to balance personal interests and professional prospects? If you have to make a choice, which factor do you think should be prioritized? Should personal interests be excluded when choosing a major? If you have to make a choice, which major do you think you should prioritize your personal interests? 3. How to ensure that students don't lose their motivation for majors that have no obvious interest? How to encourage students to pursue their interests while also considering their future employment prospects? Should students who are interested but have poor job prospects choose this major? If students choose this major, will they succeed? Should students 'personal background and adaptability be taken into account when choosing a major? If students don't have enough background and adaptability, can they adapt to the new major?

The affirmative side could debate around the following points: Contribution and return are closely related: there is a close relationship between contribution and return. Only by giving first can you expect to get a return. Whether it was in work, study, or personal life, we all need to put in effort and sweat before we can reap results and rewards. Therefore, in the debate, it can be emphasized that effort and reward are related. Only by putting in enough effort can you get the corresponding reward. The returns are usually visible: the returns between effort and return are usually visible. When we put in effort, we usually see the corresponding results and gains. For example, when we put in enough effort in work or study, we usually get rewards such as improvement and harvest. Therefore, it can be emphasized in the debate that the reward is usually visible, and only by putting in enough effort can you see the corresponding reward. 3. Contribution and return are proportional: Contribution and return are proportional. Our efforts and returns are usually proportional. Only by putting in enough effort can we get the corresponding returns. For example, when we put in enough effort at work, we usually get a higher position, better salary, and other rewards. Therefore, in the debate, it can be emphasized that effort and return are proportional. Only by putting in enough effort can you get the corresponding return. Success requires constant effort: the relationship between effort and return is constantly accumulating and sublimating. Only by constantly putting in effort could one continuously reap rewards. Success is not something that can be achieved overnight. It requires constant perseverance and hard work. Therefore, it can be emphasized in the debate that success requires constant effort. Only by putting in enough effort can you achieve continuous success. The above are some points that the positive side can revolve around. They can be freely developed and supplemented according to the specific situation and topic of the debate.

As the opposing debater, starting a business from a personal point of view could be debated from the following aspects: 1. The advantages of individual entrepreneurs: Individual entrepreneurs usually have stronger innovative thinking and flexibility to adapt to market changes and customer needs faster. In addition, they had more time and energy to think about business and solve problems, which made it easier for them to succeed. 2. The risk of personal business: There is a certain risk in personal business because the entrepreneur needs to bear all the responsibilities and risks. Moreover, entrepreneurs needed to have enough experience and skills to deal with all kinds of challenges and difficulties. 3. Restrictions on individual entrepreneurs: Although individual entrepreneurs have the ability to be innovative and flexible, they also face some restrictions such as capital, talent, market channels, etc. In addition, individual entrepreneurs also needed to consider legal and tax risks. The importance of teamwork: Starting a business is not a solo fight. Teamwork is very important. An entrepreneur needed to establish a close working relationship with team members, suppliers, and customers to achieve their goals together. 5. Learning and reference on the road of starting a business: Individual entrepreneurs can continuously improve their own ability and management level by referring to other successful enterprises and learning from their successful experiences and failures. The above are some of the opinions and methods of personal business. Of course, there are many other angles that can be discussed. Finally, it should be emphasized that the success of a business depends on a variety of factors. Individual entrepreneurs need to choose the appropriate methods and strategies to start a business according to their own situation and actual situation.

Network pros and cons As a modern communication tool, the Internet provided a convenient and fast way for people to communicate. The benefits of the internet included: 1. The Internet allows us to obtain information more easily. Through the network, we can access all kinds of information resources, including news, articles, videos, etc., anytime and anywhere. Moreover, these contents can be shared on various platforms, making the information more diverse and rich. The Internet can also help us learn and educate better. Through the internet, we can access various online courses, learning resources, library materials, etc., so that we can have a deeper understanding of various knowledge fields to improve our learning ability and level. The internet also provides us with more entertainment. Through the internet, we can access all kinds of videos, games, social media, etc. to enrich our entertainment life. However, there were also some negative effects of the Internet. The internet could also lead to the spread of false information. Through the internet, we can access all kinds of information, but this information may come from unreliable sources, which will cause us to receive wrong information and affect our judgment and decision-making. 2. The Internet could also lead to the leakage of personal privacy. Through the internet, we can easily access all kinds of sensitive personal information such as home address, phone number, etc., which may lead to the risk of personal information leakage. The internet could also lead to the spread of violence and hate speech. Through the internet, we can come into contact with all kinds of extreme speech and violence, which may have a negative impact on society. To sum up, the internet is a tool with both positive and negative effects. We need to use and manage the network correctly to maximize its advantages and avoid its negative effects.

Schools should not restrict the Internet because the Internet is a necessity of modern life. It has become an important tool for people to obtain information, learn knowledge, communicate and interact, entertainment and relax. As an educational institution, schools should provide students with an open, free and beneficial learning environment so that they can better develop their potential and creativity. Restrictions on the Internet by schools would negatively affect students 'independent learning and exploration. Restricting the use of the Internet may cause students to lose learning opportunities because they cannot obtain the latest knowledge and information on the Internet. At the same time, the use of the Internet can also lead to some bad behaviors such as Internet addiction, cyberbullying, etc., which will have a negative impact on the physical and mental health of students. The school's restrictions on the Internet could not really achieve the purpose of education. Education was not only carried out in the classroom, but also outside the classroom. The Internet was a huge information bank that could provide students with a large amount of resources and information, including academic articles, works of art, news reports, and so on. Restrictions on Internet use by schools could cause students to lose valuable opportunities for learning outside of class. To sum up, schools should not restrict the internet but should provide students with an open, free and beneficial learning environment so that they can better develop their potential and creativity.

Respected judges, dear opposing students: Hello everyone, I'm XXX. Today, as the representative of the opposition, I've prepared a wonderful debate for everyone. Our debate topic is that the use of online language is a step backward in the development of literature. As the opposing party, we will explain our views to everyone. First of all, we need to clarify the definition of online language. Cyber jargon referred to the various languages that were popular on the Internet, such as catchphrases, internet catchphrases, and so on. These terms were usually used by some internet celebrities. Although the usage of internet slang in the field of literature is getting higher and higher, it is not a form of literature but a form of popular culture. Secondly, we need to look at the positive impact of online language on the development of literature. Online language was usually concise and vivid, allowing readers to understand and feel the meaning of literary works more quickly. For example, some online catchphrases could be used at the beginning of a novel to attract the reader's attention and make the reader more engrossed in the reading. In addition, online language could also bring more exposure to literary works, increase the sales and popularity of the works, and play a positive role in promoting the development of the literary industry. However, we can't ignore the negative impact of online language on the development of literature. Online language is usually irresponsible language such as vulgar, erotic, violent, etc. These languages often appear on the Internet and have a negative impact on literature. Some online slang spread very quickly and could even spread to the entire literary world, bringing serious negative effects to literary works. For example, some of the network language caused some literary works to lose their original value and content and become some vulgar, erotic, and violent carriers, which was detrimental to the development of literature. To sum up, although the use of online language has a certain positive impact on the development of literature, it has also brought a lot of negative effects. The spread of online language was very fast. Some irresponsible language often appeared on the Internet, which had a negative impact on literature. Therefore, I think the use of online language is a step backward in the development of literature.

The ability to create works of art is more important. The positive side is the inspiration for the creation of works of art is more important. We are the negative side. We can refer to the following arguments that the negative side debater might make: 1. Creation inspiration can be crammed up at the last minute, but creation ability is the result of long-term accumulation. If you only have creative inspiration but no creative ability, then the work may lack depth and content. It's just simple plagiarism or imitation. If one only had the ability to create without inspiration, they might fall into the quagmire of plagiarism or imitation. Therefore, creative ability was more important than inspiration. 2. The ability to create can be cultivated, but inspiration can come from accumulation. If we can continue to learn, think and practice, we can cultivate our own creative ability. However, if one only had creative inspiration and no creative ability, they might lack creativity and competitiveness, making it difficult for them to stand out in the art market. Therefore, creative ability was more important than inspiration. 3. The creative ability can be measured, but the creative inspiration cannot. We can evaluate the creative ability of a work of art in various ways, such as evaluating its technique, content, style, and so on. And if we only have inspiration, we can't measure the value of a work by the same standard. Therefore, creative ability was more important than inspiration. 4. The ability to create can affect the value of a work of art, while inspiration can determine the direction and style of the work. An artist with creative ability might show different styles and characteristics in different works. However, if one only had creative inspiration, they might fall into a single creative style and it would be difficult to produce unique artistic value. Therefore, creative ability was more important than inspiration. These arguments can be used as the opposing debater's point of view in the debate, but it should be noted that the debate is not only a simple statement of the point of view, but also through logic, evidence and examples to support their point of view in order to win the game.

There are many advantages and disadvantages to surfing the internet. The following are some possible related aspects: Benefits: Learning and obtaining information: The Internet can easily obtain a variety of knowledge, news, articles, and opinions to increase their knowledge reserves and horizons. 2. Social and Communication: Through social media and online forums, people can easily communicate with others, share experiences and opinions, and build Social networks. 3. Entertainment and relaxation: The Internet allows people to enjoy all kinds of entertainment activities and ways to relax their bodies and minds, such as games, music, videos, etc. 4. Shopping and payment: Through online shopping and mobile payment, people can easily purchase various goods and services. 5, innovation and business: Through network technology and innovation, people can create a variety of new products and services to promote social development. Disadvantages: Internet addiction: Internet access can bring all kinds of pleasure and excitement, but excessive internet access may lead to addiction and affect daily life and social activities. 2. Information security: There are various risks of information leakage and network attacks on the Internet. Personal information and privacy may be violated and cause unnecessary losses. 3. False information and rumors: There is a large amount of false information and rumors on the Internet. This information may mislead people's judgment and decision-making, causing adverse effects. 4. Social media and cyberviolence: social media and online forums may become a hotbed for cyberviolence and hate speech, affecting social harmony and stability. 5. Physical health: Long-term surfing the Internet may cause eye fatigue, cervical vertebra disease, obese and other health problems. You need to properly control the time and quality of surfing the Internet. There are both advantages and disadvantages to surfing the internet. We need to look at this problem objectively and take appropriate measures to protect our health and internet safety.

The discussion of the advantages and disadvantages of the real-name system on the Internet was a relatively complicated topic that needed to be considered and analyzed from many angles. The following are some possible directions for thinking: 1. The online real-name system can bring the following benefits: - It was easier to manage and control each person's identity. - Increase the protection of personal privacy; - It was easy to track network activities and information. 2. The real-name system on the Internet may bring the following disadvantages: - Invasion of personal privacy; - It may restrict and censor the freedom of speech on the Internet; - It could lead to restrictions on discussion of politics, society, and other sensitive topics. In the debate, the opposing side could emphasize that the real-name system on the Internet might cause an invasion of freedom of speech and personal privacy, thus limiting the discussion of public issues. They could consider the following evidence to support their views: - The real-name system on the Internet may restrict freedom of speech, such as punishing or banning users who make inappropriate comments; - The online real-name system may violate personal privacy, such as tracking user activities and information through identity verification; - The real-name system on the Internet may increase the restrictions on discussion of politics, society, and other sensitive topics, thus limiting the discussion of public issues. At the same time, the positive side can emphasize that the advantage of the real-name system on the Internet is that it helps to improve management and control, and it is easy to manage and control network activities and information. They could consider the following evidence to support their views: - The real-name system can strengthen the government's supervision ability in the network field and better manage network activities and information; - The real-name system on the Internet could make it easier to track online activities and information to better understand the whereabouts and activities of the public. - The real-name system on the Internet could enhance social stability and security and reduce cybercrime and other social problems. In a debate, both sides need to fully understand each other's views and evidence and find common ground to support their own views and refute each other's views through logic and evidence. Both sides also needed to respect each other's point of view and avoid using offensive language and gestures. In the end, both sides fought for victory through reasonable debate and thinking.