Wouldn't it be a violation of the author's copyright to talk about someone else's novel on the YY channel?
On the YY channel, he said that if someone else wrote a novel without the authorization of the author, it might violate the author's copyright. According to China's copyright law, without the permission of the copyright owner, no one can copy, distribute, perform, show, broadcast, or spread information on the Internet to exploit the works of others. Saying that someone else wrote a novel on the YY channel may constitute copying, publishing, performing, screening, broadcasting, and information network transmission of the novel without the permission of the author may violate the author's copyright. Therefore, in order to avoid violating the author's copyright, they should abide by the provisions of the Chinese copyright law. Without the permission of the author, they should not talk about the novels written by others on the YY channel.
Is modifying someone else's song an copyright violation?
Changing someone else's song involves copyright issues. If you change, edit, or perform someone else's music without authorization, it may constitute copyright violation. In music copyright law, the copyright of a musical work is usually protected by the composer or copyright owner. Without their authorization, no one can change, edit, or perform the musical work. Changing someone else's song may involve violating the copyright of the composer or copyright owner, so you need their explicit permission to do so. Although you can try to modify other people's songs, you need to be aware that this may involve copyright disputes and legal issues, and may lead to legal responsibility. Therefore, it was best to understand the relevant legal provisions and obtain authorization or consult a professional lawyer before changing someone else's song.
Is broadcasting someone else's book or novel an copyright violation?
Whether or not someone else's book or novel was an copyright violation had to be analyzed in detail. Generally speaking, if the broadcast was authorized by someone else or the broadcast process did not violate the author's copyright, then there would be no copyright violation. However, if the broadcast work was an unauthorized work or the broadcast process violated the author's copyright, then it would constitute an copyright violation. In addition, if the broadcast works had been adapted into movies, TV series, animations, and other forms of works, then the broadcast would also constitute copyright. Therefore, if you wanted to broadcast someone else's book or novel, it was best to confirm whether the work had been authorized or whether it had been adapted into other forms of work to avoid copyright infringement.
Continuing someone else's novel isn't considered copyright violation, right?
Generally speaking, it was an act of copyright violation to continue writing someone else's novel without indicating the source. This was because writing a continuation of another person's novel was seen as a second creation of the original novel, and the act of second creation itself contained the risk of copyright violation. Although continuing to write novels is a popular way of writing, many authors and copyright owners oppose any form of copyright violation. Therefore, if you want to continue writing someone else's novel, it's best to first obtain permission from the author or copyright owner or take other legal methods to obtain authorization. Of course, in some cases, if the continuation novel was similar to the original novel in theme, plot, or style, and the original novel was adapted and continued, it might be regarded as a legal second creation. However, the legitimacy of this situation still needed to be judged and evaluated according to the specific situation.
Was broadcasting someone else's book on Dragonfly PM considered a violation of the author's copyright?
Generally speaking, broadcasting someone else's book on Dragonfly didn't violate the author's copyright. The streamer's book meant that the streamer was broadcasting someone else's novel instead of his own. In this case, the streamer only played the existing work and did not adapt, create, or translate it into another form. Therefore, the streamer's actions did not involve copyright issues. Of course, if the streamer made an unauthorized quote, reprint, or adaptation of the novel, it might involve copyright issues. In this case, the streamer needed to obtain the copyright owner's authorization to play the work. Broadcasters who broadcast other people's novels do not necessarily violate the author's copyright, but without authorization, they may quote, reprint, or adapt them.
Is copying someone else's work considered as copyright violation?
If copying someone else's work does not conform to the principle of creativity, it may constitute an copyright violation. The principle of creativity meant that only when the author independently created a brand new work could it be considered as an copyright violation. When copying someone else's work, if you only copy the elements in the work or simply imitate the style, structure, language, etc. of the work without creating a new work, then this behavior may not constitute copyright violation. However, if the main body, plot, character, and other aspects of the copied work have undergone major changes, causing the work to be fundamentally different from the original, then it may constitute an intellectual property right. Therefore, when copying other people's works, one had to be careful to avoid violating other people's intellectual property rights. If you are not sure whether it is an infringement, you should consult a legal professional.
Was continuing to write someone else's novel an act of copyright violation?
Continuing someone else's novel is usually an act of copyright violation because continuing someone else's novel violates the copyright of the original author. A copyright was a right that included the ownership of the creativity, creativity, and form of expression of a work. If anyone continues to write, adapt, or translate the original novel without the authorization of the original author, it will constitute an act of copyright. This behavior may bring financial losses to the original author because they may not be able to obtain copyright protection for the work. In addition, the act of writing a continuation may also destroy the uniqueness and integrity of the original novel because the content of the continuation may be completely different from the original novel or contain a large number of unauthorized modifications and alterations. Therefore, if you want to continue writing someone else's novel, it's best to get the original author's permission or indicate the source. This will ensure that your actions are legal and respect the rights of the original author.
Was it considered copyright violation to change someone else's novel into a manga?
Changing someone else's novel into a manga without the authorization of the copyright owner could be considered an act of copyright violation. In the copyright law, it was considered an act of copyright violation to adapt or create other forms of works without the authorization of the copyright owner. Changing someone else's novel into a manga was no exception. A manga was a more concrete form of expression, and it was likely to violate the copyright of the original author. Although comics could be used as a commercial activity, any commercial use without the permission of the copyright owner could lead to copyright infringement. Therefore, changing someone else's novel into a comic without authorization for commercial activities may constitute copyright violation. If you plan to change a novel into a comic, it's best to get permission from the copyright owner first to avoid possible legal risks.
Was using someone else's novel setting considered copyright violation?
Whether or not using someone else's novel setting would constitute a copyright violation had to be judged according to the specific circumstances. Generally speaking, if you use someone else's novel settings, not directly copy and paste, but use it reasonably according to your own creativity, then it does not constitute copyright violation. For example, a novel author could incorporate his own storyline, character setting, and other creative elements into his own work instead of directly copying other people's novel settings. In this case, although the work was still his work, it did not constitute copyright violation because it incorporated his own creative elements. However, if you directly copied and pasted the settings of another person's novel and made a large number of copies or used it for commercial purposes, it might constitute copyright violation. Therefore, when using other people's novel settings, one had to pay attention to the following points: 1. You cannot directly copy and paste the settings of other people's novels; 2. It needs to be used reasonably according to one's own creativity and cannot be reused in large numbers; 3. Cannot be used for commercial purposes. If you violate the above provisions, it may constitute copyright violation.
It had the same name as someone else's novel. Was it an copyright violation?
Having the same name as someone else's novel doesn't necessarily constitute copyright violation. It depends on many factors such as the author of the novel, the copyright owner, the popularity of the novel of the same name, and so on. If the author of the novel has already authorized others to use the name of the novel, then using the novel of the same name does not constitute copyright violation. However, if the author of the novel has not authorized others to use the name of the novel, then using the same name may constitute copyright violation. In addition, if the novel of the same name is very popular, many people may try to use the name of the novel to create their own novel or manga. In this case, the copyright owner may sue the violator to ensure that his intellectual property rights are protected. Therefore, if you intend to use the same name as someone else's novel, it's best to understand the copyright status of the novel and obtain authorization as much as possible.
Was mentioning someone else's song in a novel considered an copyright violation?
In the novel, mentioning someone else's song would be considered as an copyright violation, and whether or not it was an copyright violation would depend on the situation. If the song was original, then using the song's name, lyrics, or tune in the novel could be considered an copyright violation. This was because it was illegal to use other people's original elements without the authorization of the copyright owner. However, if the novel contained elements such as the storyline, characters, or scenes of the song, and these elements were not directly related to the song itself, then using the song might not constitute copyright. In addition, if the audience of the novel was limited to the singer and his fans, then using the song might not be an copyright violation. If the novel involves the unauthorized use of other people's original songs, it is recommended that the author communicate with the song copyright owner and obtain authorization before using it.