When we fill a thermos, we know it's almost full by hearing, not by looking. Please analyze this principle from the perspective of the characteristics of sound.
This is because sound is produced by the vibration of objects. When a thermos bottle is almost full, the water molecules will start to vibrate, producing obvious changes in vibration frequency and amplitude. These changes can be keenly picked up by our ears to let us know that the water is almost full. When the water is almost full, the structure and arrangement of the water molecules will change, causing the frequency and amplitude of the sound to change. This change in frequency and amplitude was very obvious and could be accurately captured by the ear. Therefore, when we can tell that the water is almost full just by listening, we don't need to look at objects or other external signals, just listen to the sound.
Why should we never judge when we don't know the full story?
Because our limited knowledge might lead us to wrong conclusions. If we judge without knowing everything, we could unfairly mislabel someone or something. For example, a person might seem rude at first, but when you learn their full story, you find out they're having a really tough day and are usually very kind.
How can we avoid judging when we don't know the full story?
Just keep an open mind. Don't jump to conclusions right away. For instance, if you see someone being late, instead of thinking they're irresponsible, just wait and see if there's a valid reason.
What should we do when hearing a boy molested story?
First, we should immediately report it to the relevant authorities like the police. They are trained to handle such serious situations.
How can we get to know someone's story when we only know their name?
Start by having a conversation. Ask open - ended questions like 'What do you like to do in your free time?' or 'Tell me about an interesting experience you've had.'
Please analyze the short story 'We ate the children last'.
This title is very disturbing at first glance. It might be a very dark and surreal short story. Maybe it uses such a shocking statement symbolically to represent some extreme situation, like the loss of humanity or a very cruel social phenomenon. However, without reading the actual story, it's hard to be more specific.
What are we in the theater? What are we when we travel? What are we when we read novels? What are we when we listen to the radio?
In the theater, we are the audience. When we travel, we are travelers. When we read novels, we are readers. When we listen to the radio, we are the audience.
Why do we analyze fiction?
We analyze fiction to uncover hidden meanings, to be entertained and enlightened at the same time. It helps us learn about history, psychology, and much more. It's a way to expand our knowledge and imagination.
We will never know when this story ends. How can we cope with such uncertainty?
I think we can try to focus on the present moments and characters' development instead of worrying about the ending. Maybe the uncertainty adds to the excitement.
Why are we always hearing the same old stories?
Well, it could be that the storytellers lack creativity or are too lazy to come up with new ones. Also, some of these same old stories might have a strong cultural or traditional value that people keep passing on. For example, fables that teach moral lessons have been told over and over again for generations. And in the media, some formulas for stories are proven to be popular, so they keep getting recycled.
Can we know when someone records their stories?
Sometimes it's possible if they mention the date or time of recording. But often, it's hard to know for sure.