Why is science fiction considered bad?

The reason machines are considered bad in science fiction is complex. It could be that they represent the unknown and uncontrollable. Or maybe they symbolize the dehumanizing effect of technology. Another possibility is that they pose a risk to human existence and autonomy.

Well, some people think it's bad because the concepts can be too far-fetched and hard to relate to in real life.

The reason some consider Star Wars bad for science fiction could be that it didn't explore deep scientific themes or that it set a certain style that was too commercialized and less intellectually stimulating for the genre.

Well, some might say Star Wars is bad science fiction because it often ignores basic scientific principles. For example, the sound in space. In reality, sound can't travel in a vacuum like space, but in Star Wars, we hear all those laser blasts and spaceship engines roaring. It's a big no - no in terms of science.

Some might think fiction is bad because it can sometimes be seen as a waste of time or an escape from reality instead of dealing with real-world issues.

Fiction isn't bad. It depends on how you look at it. For some, it might seem bad if it promotes negative values or is too violent. But mostly, it's a form of escape and creativity.

No, Breaking Bad isn't typically classified as science fiction. It's more of a crime drama with intense character development and complex storylines.

I think it's because people have different expectations and standards. Maybe the plot seems too convoluted or the characters aren't relatable. But it really depends on the individual's preferences and what they look for in a story.

The perception that historical fiction is bad often stems from concerns like poor character development or a lack of authenticity in depicting the era. Sometimes, it might just not engage the reader or viewer effectively.

I think it's all a matter of personal taste. Some people might not like the nonlinear storytelling or the violence in it.