What does 'harry destroys a tight ass fanfic' mean?

Well, 'harry' here might refer to a character named Harry. 'Destroys' could imply that he has a negative impact on or undermines the 'tight ass fanfic'. However, without more context, it's hard to be certain. Maybe in this fanfic, Harry's actions go against the ideas or plotlines that were set up in a rather forceful way.

Well, it could imply that in a Naruto - related fan - created story (fanfic), Naruto somehow causes destruction within a situation that is very difficult or 'tight' in the context of the fanfic's plot. But without more context, it's really hard to be specific.

It could mean that Percy, perhaps a character or a person, is ruining or disrupting a very good or well - constructed fanfic. Maybe Percy has some sort of action or behavior that goes against the plot, characters, or themes of the fanfic, thus 'destroying' it in a sense.

The phrase contains inappropriate and vulgar language. If we assume 'Harry' is a character name, it seems to be about a situation where this Harry is involved in some sort of destruction related to a fan - created fictional work, but the use of 'tight cunt' is unacceptable in proper language.

It's a rather odd statement. 'Harry' here might refer to a character named Harry in a particular fandom. 'Ruins' implies that he somehow spoils or negatively impacts a 'fanfic' (fan fiction). However, 'tight ass' is an inappropriate and unclear part in this context. It could be a very unorthodox or poorly worded description within the fan - created story.

I don't think it is. Fandom statements usually revolve around praising the fanfic, discussing characters' development, or sharing favorite parts. This phrase sounds more like a very specific and rather negative reaction to a fanfic that is not commonly heard in general fandom chatter. It might be something used in a very niche or private discussion within a small part of a fandom.

I'm not sure if it's a common statement in any specific fandom. It seems rather unusual and specific. It could be something unique to a small group of fans or even just a one - off comment made by someone. There are so many different fandoms out there, and this doesn't seem like a widespread or typical statement among them.

Well, it could mean that in the context of Percy Jackson, something about Percy Jackson's character or actions in a fan - created story (fanfic) disrupts or spoils what was otherwise a really good or well - structured fanfic. Maybe his actions go against the flow or theme the fanfic author had in mind.

Using such a title violates the norms of good taste and respect in the fan community. Fanfic is meant to be a form of creative expression that is inclusive and family - friendly, not containing such offensive elements.

No, it's not a common statement. Usually, in the Naruto fan community, statements are more about the positive aspects of fanfics like new character developments, interesting plot twists, etc. This kind of statement which implies destruction of a fanfic is not something you'd hear often.