Webnovel Author: Logi_cal - Fanfic Collection

He didn't die, he's alive.

Wtf

Really?

Yes

Learning swordsmanship can indeed be perceived as easier compared to archery due to several factors. Firstly, swordsmanship often involves more tangible physical movements that are easier for beginners to grasp initially. Unlike archery, where precise hand-eye coordination and understanding of arrow trajectory are essential from the outset, swordsmanship allows beginners to engage in basic drills and movements relatively quickly.Additionally, immediate feedback in swordsmanship training can make learning more straightforward. With a sword in hand, practitioners can feel the impact of their strikes and parries, providing instant feedback on their technique. This direct physical feedback can facilitate faster progress and adjustment compared to archery, where hitting a target requires more finesse and consistency.Furthermore, the structured nature of many swordsmanship training programs, such as those found in historical European martial arts (HEMA) or modern fencing, can provide clear milestones and progressions for learners. Beginners can follow a structured curriculum that gradually introduces more advanced techniques and concepts, allowing them to build upon their skills over time in a logical and organized manner.Moreover, the accessibility of swordsmanship equipment and training facilities in some areas may also contribute to its perceived ease of learning. Unlike archery, which often requires specialized equipment and facilities for target practice, basic swordsmanship drills can be performed with minimal equipment and space, making it more accessible to beginners.In conclusion, while both swordsmanship and archery require dedication and practice to master, the tangible physical movements, immediate feedback, structured training programs, and accessibility of equipment and facilities associated with swordsmanship can indeed make it easier for beginners to learn compared to archery.The draw weight of an ordinary medieval war bow is estimated to have been max 80-110 pounds, but the draw weight of few individual surviving bows has been as high as whopping 185 pounds.

Bruh, you literally copy pasted chatgpt.

And we are talking about war.

Well, it also depends on the type of bow you are trying to learn. You need a minimum strength of 30lbs to pull a bowstring that is capable enough to pierce flesh with cloth only. To pierce chainmail would require bows like longbows, which had a minimum draw weight of 180lbs. So, I would say learning swordsmanship is easier.

Wording could have been better.

Yeah i don't know where the misconception began about longswords and armors being heavy. The armors usually weighed around 15-25 kg (33-55lbs) and a longswords usually weigh around 1-1.5 kg (2lbs). It breaks my immersion in a fanfic if they say that the armor was heavy or a sword was heavy. They could give the reason for difficulty in moving in armor by saying they were clunky which wasn't the case in real history as mobility was an important thing.

Alright my bad i thought they were able to pierce plate armor.Searched it up:At the Battle of Crécy, the English longbowmen were positioned strategically on high ground, giving them a tactical advantage. While the longbows might not have directly pierced the plate armor of the French cavalry, they could still inflict casualties and disrupt the enemy formation in several ways:Volume of Fire: English longbowmen were trained to shoot rapidly and accurately. The sheer volume of arrows raining down on the French cavalry would have increased the likelihood of hitting vulnerable spots or causing blunt force trauma, even if individual arrows didn't pierce the armor.Targeting Unprotected Areas: Longbowmen likely aimed for gaps in the armor or less protected areas of the body, such as the face, underarms, or legs. Even with plate armor, there were areas where soldiers were less protected.Impact and Injury: Even if arrows didn't penetrate the armor, they could still injure or incapacitate the horses or their riders. Injured or disrupted cavalry units would become less effective in battle.Psychological Impact: The relentless barrage of arrows would have created fear and confusion among the French cavalry, potentially causing them to break formation or lose morale, leading to further vulnerability.Overall, while the longbows might not have directly pierced the plate armor of the French cavalry, their effectiveness in causing casualties and disrupting enemy formations contributed significantly to the English victory at the Battle of CrécyThough i believe we can both agree a swordsman is superior than a archer.

By they i meant knights.

"There's bows which can pierce plate armour, and the reason for this is that both bows and armour vary a lot regarding their constructions." I mean sure some arrows may be deflected. But in a battle there are multiple archers not a single one. They will be easily taken down. As knights which acted as mostly cavalry, cannot deflect arrows with a sword. Besides learning swordsmanship is easier as compared to archery.

bruh, don't spread false info. Go and search battle of crecy on youtube.

You can. I am also using a huawei nova 7i. Connect your Gmail account with Facebook and connect it through that. It works for me. Keep in mind you need both apks for facebook and webnovel.

Do what you are more comfortable with.

Ah, thank you for telling me i thought she was fanon.