webnovel
In the debate competition, our side's point of view is more harmful than beneficial to the unification of history. How to refute the other side's "

In the debate competition, our side's point of view is more harmful than beneficial to the unification of history. How to refute the other side's "

2024-09-11 14:50
In the debate, our point of view is more harmful than beneficial to the popularity of history. How to refute the other party's statement that we understand history from joking about history in our daily lives, and thus develop an interest in studying history? Thank you!
1 answer

First of all, we need to make it clear that the purpose of the debate is not to refute the other party's point of view, but to convince the other party to accept our point of view. Therefore, before refuting the other party's point of view, we need to think about how to better express our point of view. If the other party thinks that jokes do more harm than good to the spread of history, we can refute it from the following aspects: Jokes could allow people to understand history more deeply. Joking not only allowed people to understand the background and details of historical events, but also allowed people to understand the views and attitudes of different figures in historical events, so as to better understand the evolution of historical figures and historical events. Joking could improve people's cultural quality. History is an important part of culture, and jokes can be used as an interesting form of cultural expression to let people better understand and understand history and culture. Jokes could enrich people's entertainment life. Although historical events were important, they were often boring. Joking could be used as a form of entertainment to let people understand historical events in a relaxed atmosphere and improve their quality of life. To sum up, we can come to the conclusion that although the joke may bring some negative effects, it plays an important role in the popularity of history. It can make people have a deeper understanding of history, improve cultural quality and enrich their entertainment life. Therefore, I think the joke has more disadvantages than advantages for the popularity of history.

Urgently looking for an imposing opening speech for the debate! Our point of view is that the development of the internet is more beneficial than harmful to literature!

Dear judges and audience, Today, we are here to have a debate about the development of online literature. We firmly believe that the development of the Internet has more advantages than disadvantages for literature. The development of network technology brought a broader space for the development of literature. As an emerging form, online literature not only satisfied the diverse needs of readers, but also provided more inspiration and creativity for literary creation. The online literature platform allowed authors to freely create and publish, breaking the restrictions on the publication and circulation of traditional literature, providing more possibilities for the development of literature. The development of internet technology had also brought more readers to literature. As a new form of media, online literature was receiving more and more attention and promotion. Through the online literature platform, readers could read the latest novel content anytime, anywhere, and interact with the author. This made literature no longer a high and mighty field, but could be shared and experienced with more people. Of course, the development of network technology also brought about some negative effects. The emergence of online literature made it easier for some indecent content to spread on the Internet. The development of network technology has also led to the decline of traditional literature. Many readers choose to read literary works through the Internet instead of going to the library or bookstore. We need to pay attention to these problems and solve them. To sum up, the development of the Internet had more advantages than disadvantages for literature. As a new form of media, online literature brought more possibilities and opportunities for the development of literature. We believe that in the development of online literature, we should pay attention to protecting the intellectual property rights of literature, strengthen the management and supervision of online literature platforms, and also strengthen the quality and education of readers to make online literature an important way to spread positive energy and values.

1 answer
2025-03-09 23:08

Debate: The development of the Internet is more beneficial than harmful to literature

Dear judges and audience, what I'm going to bring today is the view that the development of the Internet has more advantages than disadvantages for literature. First of all, we need to make it clear that the development of the Internet has more advantages than disadvantages for literature. The development of network technology had brought many new opportunities to literature. As a new form of literature, online literature was not limited by time and place, allowing more people to have the opportunity to read literary works. The development of network technology also provided a more convenient way for the spread of literary works, allowing literary works to spread more widely. Secondly, the development of the Internet had more advantages than disadvantages for literature. The development of network technology has provided a broader platform for literary creation and research, promoting the innovation and development of literature. The continuous emergence of new literary schools and works on the online literature platform attracted more readers 'attention and participation in literary activities. Finally, the development of the internet had more advantages than disadvantages for literature, which was reflected in the regulation and guidance of literature. The development of network technology has provided more open and free development space for literature, and at the same time, it has also provided more creative inspiration and ideas for literary practitioners. The development of network technology made the literary industry more standardized and standardized, providing better protection for the development and inheritance of literature. To sum up, the development of network technology has brought many opportunities and challenges to literature, but at the same time, it has also played a positive role in promoting literature. The development of the Internet has more advantages than disadvantages for literature. We should support and promote the development of online literature more actively and make it an important part of the development of literature.

1 answer
2025-02-23 02:28

Is reading extra-cursory books more beneficial than harmful, or more harmful than beneficial?

The advantages of reading extra-cursory books outweighed the disadvantages. Reading extra-cursory books can help people broaden their horizons, increase their knowledge, and improve their thinking and language skills. Through reading novels, history books, philosophy books and other types of extra-cursory books, people can understand different stories and characters and learn different ideas and values. This knowledge could not only enrich people's lives but also improve their overall quality. Of course, there were some negative effects of reading extra-cursory books. Some people might be so engrossed in the world of books that they neglect important things in real life. Others may be negatively affected by reading unhealthy books, resulting in physical and mental health problems. Therefore, he needed to pay attention to balance when reading extra-cursory books.

1 answer
2024-09-19 12:38

Is reading online novels more beneficial than harmful or harmful?

The pros and cons of reading online novels varied from person to person, depending on one's personal preferences and purpose of reading. From the perspective of some people, reading online novels might have some benefits, such as: 1. It provides a new reading experience: There are many types of online novels with rich content, allowing readers to come into contact with novels of different styles and topics to provide a new reading experience. Satisfying reading needs: Some people may not be able to read traditional books for various reasons. Online novels can be used as an alternative way to meet their reading needs. Increase the scope of knowledge: web novels often contain some fictional worlds and plots that allow readers to come into contact with different cultures and knowledge backgrounds to increase their knowledge. However, there were some potential drawbacks to reading online novels, such as: Some people may be addicted to the plot and characters in online novels and neglect important things in real life, which will negatively affect their health. 2. Distorted values: Some web novels may have some bad values and plots that may affect the reader's values and moral values. 3. Waste of time: Reading online novels requires a certain amount of time and energy. If you over-read it, it may cause time to be wasted and affect your work and study. Therefore, reading online novels has both advantages and disadvantages. The readers should read according to their own actual situation and preferences. Pay attention to moderate reading to avoid being addicted to it.

1 answer
2024-07-16 20:49

Was reading novels more beneficial than harmful?

The pros and cons of reading novels varied from person to person, but in general, there were some situations where the benefits outweighed the cons. Fictions could help people improve their imagination and creativity. Through reading novels, people could come into contact with different storylines and characters to stimulate their creativity and explore new ideas. Fictions could give people time to relax and entertain themselves. Many novels are full of tension and thrills, but reading these novels can also allow people to temporarily escape from reality and relax for a moment to relieve stress. The novel could also promote social interaction. Many novels have the author's personal experience or adaptation, which can let readers understand different story backgrounds and cultural differences, and also promote communication and interaction between readers. However, there were some negative effects of reading novels. Fictions can distract people from other important tasks. Reading novels can also be addictive, causing people to be immersed in the story for a long time and ignore important things in real life. To sum up, reading novels has both advantages and disadvantages. People should decide whether to read novels or not according to their own circumstances and needs.

1 answer
2024-09-09 05:00

Was reading novels more beneficial than harmful?

The pros and cons of reading a novel varied from person to person, depending on one's personal values and purpose of reading. Some readers believe that reading novels can help them relax, improve their imagination and creativity, and cultivate reading habits. The novel could also provide elements such as plot and characters to help readers better understand the world and human nature. In addition, some novels also provided entertainment and satisfaction. However, other readers believe that reading novels may lead to indulging in fictional worlds and plots, ignoring important things in real life and even negatively affecting one's mental health. Reading novels might also waste too much time and energy, affecting studies and work. Therefore, whether reading a novel had more advantages than disadvantages or disadvantages than advantages depended on the reader's personal situation and purpose of reading. As readers, we should try our best to maintain rationality and balance. We should enjoy reading while paying attention to our physical and mental health and real life.

1 answer
2025-03-02 13:45

The negative side of pop songs was greater than the positive side. This is our school's debate competition. We need to debate the views. Everyone should be more enthusiastic and get extra points.

The negative effects of pop songs mainly included: Air Pollution: Many pop songs are accompanied by intense drumming and singing. This music may produce noise and pollute the air. 2. Affects mental health: pop songs may cause listeners to get excited and lose control of their emotions, especially at night or when they are alone. These types of music can have a negative impact on mental health. 3. Waste of resources: Many popular songs need to be purchased or downloaded, which will lead to a waste of resources. In addition, the spread of popular songs could also lead to copyright issues. However, pop songs also had positive effects. 1. Promotion of cultural exchange: pop songs are an important part of cultural exchange. They can help people better understand and appreciate different music and cultures across cultural differences and language barriers. 2. Stimulate creativity: Many popular songs are created by independent musicians and artists. This music inspires people's creativity and imagination, which has promoted the development of the music industry. 3. Stimulating consumption: pop songs can motivate listeners to buy goods and digital products to promote economic development. To sum up, pop songs had both negative and positive effects. It was a complicated question whether popular songs should be restricted or banned, which required a comprehensive consideration of various factors.

1 answer
2024-09-18 00:09

It was a debate about whether the internet was more beneficial than harmful to teenagers. I'm looking for a beautiful hosting draft.

Respected judges, dear audience, hello! Today, we are going to have a debate on whether the internet is more beneficial than harmful to teenagers. As the host of this competition, I represent the Internet Alliance and am honored to present this wonderful debate to everyone. First of all, let us understand the impact of the Internet on teenagers. The internet can expand our knowledge, enrich our interests, improve our thinking ability, and let us understand the world better. However, there are also some negative effects on the Internet, such as Internet addiction, information leakage, network security and other problems. These problems will pose a threat to the physical and mental health of young people. Next, let's listen to the opinions of the two contestants. The contestant on the left voiced his opinion. He believed that there were two main negative effects of surfing the Internet on teenagers: one was Internet addiction, and the other was the decline in academic performance. He suggested that parents should limit the time teenagers spent online and supervise their behavior to prevent them from being addicted to the Internet. Then, the contestant on the right also voiced his opinion. He believed that surfing the Internet had a great positive impact on teenagers. First of all, the Internet can broaden our horizons, let us understand more information and knowledge, and lay a solid foundation for our future. Secondly, surfing the Internet can train our social skills and expression skills so that we can better communicate with others. After listening to the views of the two contestants, I would like to ask the judges, do you think that the advantages of surfing the Internet outweigh the disadvantages or the disadvantages outweigh the advantages? Please express your opinion. Thank you for your questions. According to the voting results of the judges, the Internet Alliance believes that the advantages of surfing the Internet for teenagers outweigh the disadvantages. However, we must also be aware of the negative effects of the Internet, such as Internet addiction, information leakage, and other problems. Therefore, parents and teenagers should guide teenagers to the Internet so that they can maintain a healthy physical and mental state while surfing the Internet. Finally, I would like to thank the judges and the audience for their attendance and thank the contestants for their wonderful performance. That's all for this match. Thank you, everyone!

1 answer
2025-03-04 20:08

The influence of the internet on college students is more harmful than beneficial

The influence of the Internet on college students was complicated. There were advantages and disadvantages. The Internet provided a wealth of learning resources for college students. Through the online platform, students can learn a variety of subject knowledge anytime and anywhere, and can come into contact with students and teachers from different regions and backgrounds. The Internet also provides students with a variety of online courses and teaching materials to help them better master knowledge and skills. The Internet provided opportunities for college students to communicate and socialize. Through the online platform, college students could make new friends and share their thoughts and experiences to expand their social circles. The Internet also provides a virtual workplace for college students to work online in their spare time. However, the Internet also had some negative effects on college students. Internet addiction was an important problem. College students might spend a lot of time and energy on online platforms, resulting in a lack of social and sports activities in real life. The Internet may also have a negative impact on the mental health of college students, such as leading to psychological problems such as depression and anxiety. The influence of the Internet on college students was complicated. There were advantages and disadvantages. College students should be aware of the risk of Internet addiction and make reasonable use of the advantages of the Internet to balance their studies and life. At the same time, schools and society should also strengthen the supervision and management of college students 'network to ensure their network safety and physical and mental health.

1 answer
2024-09-15 18:12

Debate competition materials, positive side: doing is more important than saying; Negative side: saying is more important than doing.

The theme of this debate was about the importance of doing and talking. The positive side believed that doing was more important than talking, while the negative side believed that talking was more important than doing. Affirmative point of view: actions are more important than words. Because doing was a practical action that could bring direct and practical benefits. When we make a decision or action, we are actually responsible for it and trying to achieve it. Only when we put our ideas and beliefs into action can we prove that they are correct. In contrast, verbal expressions could not bring about actual changes. Opposite point of view: Saying is more important than doing. This was because it allowed people to express their thoughts and opinions, thereby arousing the resonance and support of others. By speaking, we can pass on information and knowledge to help others better understand our views and beliefs. In addition, it can also bring certain social benefits, allowing us to establish connections and interactions with others. The outcome of this debate depended on the opinions and arguments of both parties. In the end, it had to be judged based on facts and logic. Both sides needed to provide sufficient evidence and reasons to convince the audience.

1 answer
2024-09-17 01:29
a
b
c
d
e
f
g
h
i
j
k
l
m
n
o
p
q
r
s
t
u
v
w
x
y
z