Debate competition materials, positive side: doing is more important than saying; Negative side: saying is more important than doing.

The ability to create works of art is more important. The positive side is the inspiration for the creation of works of art is more important. We are the negative side. We can refer to the following arguments that the negative side debater might make: 1. Creation inspiration can be crammed up at the last minute, but creation ability is the result of long-term accumulation. If you only have creative inspiration but no creative ability, then the work may lack depth and content. It's just simple plagiarism or imitation. If one only had the ability to create without inspiration, they might fall into the quagmire of plagiarism or imitation. Therefore, creative ability was more important than inspiration. 2. The ability to create can be cultivated, but inspiration can come from accumulation. If we can continue to learn, think and practice, we can cultivate our own creative ability. However, if one only had creative inspiration and no creative ability, they might lack creativity and competitiveness, making it difficult for them to stand out in the art market. Therefore, creative ability was more important than inspiration. 3. The creative ability can be measured, but the creative inspiration cannot. We can evaluate the creative ability of a work of art in various ways, such as evaluating its technique, content, style, and so on. And if we only have inspiration, we can't measure the value of a work by the same standard. Therefore, creative ability was more important than inspiration. 4. The ability to create can affect the value of a work of art, while inspiration can determine the direction and style of the work. An artist with creative ability might show different styles and characteristics in different works. However, if one only had creative inspiration, they might fall into a single creative style and it would be difficult to produce unique artistic value. Therefore, creative ability was more important than inspiration. These arguments can be used as the opposing debater's point of view in the debate, but it should be noted that the debate is not only a simple statement of the point of view, but also through logic, evidence and examples to support their point of view in order to win the game.

The negative effects of pop songs mainly included: Air Pollution: Many pop songs are accompanied by intense drumming and singing. This music may produce noise and pollute the air. 2. Affects mental health: pop songs may cause listeners to get excited and lose control of their emotions, especially at night or when they are alone. These types of music can have a negative impact on mental health. 3. Waste of resources: Many popular songs need to be purchased or downloaded, which will lead to a waste of resources. In addition, the spread of popular songs could also lead to copyright issues. However, pop songs also had positive effects. 1. Promotion of cultural exchange: pop songs are an important part of cultural exchange. They can help people better understand and appreciate different music and cultures across cultural differences and language barriers. 2. Stimulate creativity: Many popular songs are created by independent musicians and artists. This music inspires people's creativity and imagination, which has promoted the development of the music industry. 3. Stimulating consumption: pop songs can motivate listeners to buy goods and digital products to promote economic development. To sum up, pop songs had both negative and positive effects. It was a complicated question whether popular songs should be restricted or banned, which required a comprehensive consideration of various factors.

The conclusion of the opposing side of the online pros and cons debate: The advantages of the network: 1. Ease: The Internet makes information transmission faster and more convenient. People can obtain information from any part of the world in a few seconds. 2. Freedom: The Internet is a free space where people can freely express their thoughts and opinions on the Internet without restrictions. Sharing: The Internet allows people to share their knowledge and experience, making knowledge more universal and shared. 4. Creation: The Internet provides more opportunities for people to create and start businesses. People can achieve more innovation and inventions through the Internet. Weakness of the Internet: Fake: The authenticity and credibility of online information are questioned. Some information may be processed and processed to lack authenticity. 2. Misleading: Information on the Internet spreads very quickly. Some information may be mistransmitted and misinterpreted to mislead people's judgments and decisions. 3. Invasion of privacy: The spread of online information may invade people's privacy and expose people's personal information. 4. Addiction: Overuse of the Internet may cause people to be addicted to the online world and affect their physical and mental health. To sum up, the network has many advantages and disadvantages. When using the network, we need to rationally view its advantages and disadvantages, make full use of its advantages and avoid its disadvantages, so as to better use the network to bring more value to our society and individuals.

First of all, we need to make it clear that the purpose of the debate is not to refute the other party's point of view, but to convince the other party to accept our point of view. Therefore, before refuting the other party's point of view, we need to think about how to better express our point of view. If the other party thinks that jokes do more harm than good to the spread of history, we can refute it from the following aspects: Jokes could allow people to understand history more deeply. Joking not only allowed people to understand the background and details of historical events, but also allowed people to understand the views and attitudes of different figures in historical events, so as to better understand the evolution of historical figures and historical events. Joking could improve people's cultural quality. History is an important part of culture, and jokes can be used as an interesting form of cultural expression to let people better understand and understand history and culture. Jokes could enrich people's entertainment life. Although historical events were important, they were often boring. Joking could be used as a form of entertainment to let people understand historical events in a relaxed atmosphere and improve their quality of life. To sum up, we can come to the conclusion that although the joke may bring some negative effects, it plays an important role in the popularity of history. It can make people have a deeper understanding of history, improve cultural quality and enrich their entertainment life. Therefore, I think the joke has more disadvantages than advantages for the popularity of history.

Positive descriptions, side descriptions, and negative contrast were all commonly used in literature to let the readers better understand and feel the plot, characters, and scenes in the work. Positive descriptions referred to the direct description of the positive characters in the novel, such as the character's personality, appearance, behavior, and inner feelings, in order to attract the reader's attention and resonate with them. Positive descriptions often use vivid, vivid, and specific language and description techniques to let the readers feel the author's deep insight and description of the characters, as well as the characters 'personalities and characteristics. Side descriptions were used to describe the secondary objects in the work to set off the positive objects, such as the relationship between the characters, the background of the environment, the foreshadowing of the plot, etc., in order to enhance the twists and turns of the plot. Side descriptions often used rich and complicated descriptions and rhetoric to let the readers feel the rich information and details in the works, as well as the ups and downs of the plot. Negative contrast refers to the description of the negative object in the work to highlight the value and significance of the positive object, such as the flaws, weaknesses, and crimes of the characters. Negative contrast often used strong and powerful description techniques and rhetoric to let the readers feel the shock and impact of the work and feel the fragility and tenacity of the characters. Positive descriptions, side descriptions, and negative contrast were commonly used in literature to allow readers to better understand and feel the plot, characters, and scenes in the work, enhancing the artistic appeal and expressiveness of the work.

As the opposing side, you need to ask the opposing side some questions to show your point of view and weaken their point of view. Here are some possible questions: How is the relationship between opportunity and success determined? Why did some people succeed despite the lack of opportunities? Is there a linear relationship between success and opportunity? If so, could it be assumed that the probability of success was constant given enough opportunities? If so, could human intervention be used to increase the probability of success? What is the definition of success? What is the difference between different people's definition of success? How does this affect the relationship between opportunity and success? Is there a positive relationship between success and personal effort? If so, could it be assumed that the probability of success would decrease in the absence of sufficient effort? If so, could human intervention be used to increase the probability of success? Should we value opportunity more than other factors such as talent or luck in life? If so, could these factors be manually intervened or changed? Can success be measured? If so, could you measure a person's success based on certain indicators? If so, what are these indicators? Can success be guaranteed or predicted? If there is no guarantee or prediction, how can we ensure that people can succeed in the absence of opportunities? These questions could stimulate the positive side to explore the relationship between opportunity and success and present their views and arguments. At the same time, these questions could also lead the opposing side to think deeply and refute the positive side's point of view.

Network pros and cons As a modern communication tool, the Internet provided a convenient and fast way for people to communicate. The benefits of the internet included: 1. The Internet allows us to obtain information more easily. Through the network, we can access all kinds of information resources, including news, articles, videos, etc., anytime and anywhere. Moreover, these contents can be shared on various platforms, making the information more diverse and rich. The Internet can also help us learn and educate better. Through the internet, we can access various online courses, learning resources, library materials, etc., so that we can have a deeper understanding of various knowledge fields to improve our learning ability and level. The internet also provides us with more entertainment. Through the internet, we can access all kinds of videos, games, social media, etc. to enrich our entertainment life. However, there were also some negative effects of the Internet. The internet could also lead to the spread of false information. Through the internet, we can access all kinds of information, but this information may come from unreliable sources, which will cause us to receive wrong information and affect our judgment and decision-making. 2. The Internet could also lead to the leakage of personal privacy. Through the internet, we can easily access all kinds of sensitive personal information such as home address, phone number, etc., which may lead to the risk of personal information leakage. The internet could also lead to the spread of violence and hate speech. Through the internet, we can come into contact with all kinds of extreme speech and violence, which may have a negative impact on society. To sum up, the internet is a tool with both positive and negative effects. We need to use and manage the network correctly to maximize its advantages and avoid its negative effects.

If the negative side says that reading martial arts romance novels is a waste of time, what can the positive side say? The positive side can emphasize the benefits of reading books for leisure, such as: 1. Extending Knowledge: Leisure Books cover a variety of topics and fields, allowing readers to understand different fields of knowledge and thus increase their knowledge. 2, improve reading ability: reading leisure books can improve reading ability because the author usually uses more complicated language and sentence structures. This is a challenge for the reader's reading ability, but it is also a process of improvement. 3. Cultivate imagination: leisure books often contain fantasy and fantasy elements, which can let the reader's imagination play, which is very helpful in cultivating creativity and imagination. 4. Relax your body and mind: Reading leisure books can relax your body and mind, reduce stress and anxiety, and improve your sleep quality and mental state. Increase social skills: Through reading, you can resonate and communicate with other readers to increase social skills. Therefore, although reading leisure books might take some time, there were indeed many benefits that could benefit the readers.

I don't think so. Novels are a reflection of life, and life has both positive and negative aspects. A good novel will balance both. For instance, a story about a war will surely have negative expressions about the horror and destruction, but it might also have positive expressions about heroism and friendship. Without both, the story would be incomplete.

Pure literature and popular literature both had their own vitality and value. It was impossible to simply compare which one had more vitality. Pure literature usually referred to literary works that focused on artistic expression and aesthetic experience, such as classic literary works, modern poetry, novels, essays, etc. Pure literature works usually had profound thoughts, unique aesthetic style, and profound cultural heritage. They could arouse the readers 'resonance and thinking, and had higher artistic value and historical significance. On the other hand, popular literature paid more attention to the entertainment and interest of the readers. Usually, it was presented in the form of stories, novels, comics, etc., and the reader group was more extensive. It paid more attention to legibility and entertainment. The purpose of popular literature was usually to attract readers and let them obtain entertainment and knowledge in a relaxed and pleasant atmosphere. Although pure literature and popular literature had different ways of expression and audiences, they both had vitality and value. Pure literature could be recognized and appreciated by readers through the accumulation and inheritance of time, while popular literature was constantly developing and changing to adapt to different reader groups and market needs. Therefore, both pure literature and popular literature should be paid attention to and respected by us. They are all important components of culture.