In the debate, we are the affirmative side, and the topic is a toy. Is there any good point of view or material to support this argument?

Whether high school students wanted to go to college was a question worth discussing. Here are some of the reasons for the affirmative debater: 1. Getting a higher degree can provide more opportunities. In today's society, academic qualifications had become the threshold for many professions. Having a higher academic qualification could provide more career choices and higher salaries. Especially in today's advanced technology, many industries require talents with high academic qualifications to be competent. High school education may not be enough to meet the requirements of these positions. 2. High school education and university education are different. High school education paid more attention to the cultivation of students 'basic quality and subject knowledge, while university education paid more attention to the cultivation of students' comprehensive quality and in-depth research. If high school students could get a higher degree, they could gain more experience and knowledge during their university life to improve their overall quality and competitiveness. 3. College students also have the opportunity to contribute to society. University education was not only for students to obtain higher academic qualifications, but also for students to become talents with independent thinking and innovative ability. If high school students could obtain higher academic qualifications, they could try various social activities and internships to contribute to society during their university years. High school education also required students to develop in all aspects. High school education not only cultivated students 'subject knowledge, but also their comprehensive quality and social skills. If high school students could obtain a higher degree, they could participate in various clubs and activities during their university years to train their social skills and comprehensive quality, laying a solid foundation for their future. To sum up, whether a high school student wanted to go to college or not depended on their personal situation and goals. If high school students could obtain higher academic qualifications, they would have more career opportunities and opportunities to contribute to society. However, if high school students did not want to pursue an overly high academic qualification, they could choose other occupations and activities to develop themselves in an all-round way.

The affirmative side could debate around the following points: Contribution and return are closely related: there is a close relationship between contribution and return. Only by giving first can you expect to get a return. Whether it was in work, study, or personal life, we all need to put in effort and sweat before we can reap results and rewards. Therefore, in the debate, it can be emphasized that effort and reward are related. Only by putting in enough effort can you get the corresponding reward. The returns are usually visible: the returns between effort and return are usually visible. When we put in effort, we usually see the corresponding results and gains. For example, when we put in enough effort in work or study, we usually get rewards such as improvement and harvest. Therefore, it can be emphasized in the debate that the reward is usually visible, and only by putting in enough effort can you see the corresponding reward. 3. Contribution and return are proportional: Contribution and return are proportional. Our efforts and returns are usually proportional. Only by putting in enough effort can we get the corresponding returns. For example, when we put in enough effort at work, we usually get a higher position, better salary, and other rewards. Therefore, in the debate, it can be emphasized that effort and return are proportional. Only by putting in enough effort can you get the corresponding return. Success requires constant effort: the relationship between effort and return is constantly accumulating and sublimating. Only by constantly putting in effort could one continuously reap rewards. Success is not something that can be achieved overnight. It requires constant perseverance and hard work. Therefore, it can be emphasized in the debate that success requires constant effort. Only by putting in enough effort can you achieve continuous success. The above are some points that the positive side can revolve around. They can be freely developed and supplemented according to the specific situation and topic of the debate.

The information explosion has indeed greatly improved the ability of humans to obtain and process information. We can learn more facts and truths through a large amount of information. In this case, we are getting closer to the truth and can find the truth faster and make the right decision. However, the information explosion also brought some negative effects. Due to the amount of information we receive, some truths may be covered up or misunderstood. We need to spend more time and effort to filter and confirm the information to ensure that the information we obtain is accurate and credible. Therefore, even though the information explosion has brought us closer and closer to the truth, we still need to be cautious and suspicious, and constantly verify and confirm to avoid being misled by false information.

Is it beneficial to open the book to debate (I'm in the affirmative): In discussing the benefits of opening books, we need to make the following points clear: 1. Opening the book does not mean that the content itself is harmful. Reading beneficial content under the right conditions can promote personal growth and development. For example, learning new knowledge, understanding history and culture, appreciating literary works, and so on could all be done by opening books. Reading was not entirely harmless. Reading could bring about some negative effects such as addiction, negative emotions, and so on. Therefore, we need to consider the impact and consequences of reading and take appropriate measures to reduce the negative effects. 3. Whether or not an open book is beneficial depends on the content of the reading and the way of reading. If the content of the book was valuable, but the way of reading it was not appropriate, it might still have a negative impact. Therefore, when reading, we need to pay attention to the reading method and attitude to minimize the negative effects. To sum up, I think it's beneficial to open a book. Although reading will bring some negative effects, as long as we read beneficial content under appropriate conditions and adopt appropriate reading methods and attitudes, we can minimize the negative effects and promote personal growth and development.

Emotional factors are more likely to affect success. You can refer to the following relevant papers and materials: 1 The Emotions and Emotional Intelligence by Daniel Goleman (2000): This article explored the relationship between emotional intelligence and success and pointed out the impact of emotional factors on success. 2 Emotions and Success by James D, Professor of Psychology, Richard A Berk (2013): This article introduced the role of emotional factors in success, including motivation, self-confidence, optimism and so on. 3 The Emotions and Your Life by Laurens (2016): This book explored the impact of emotional factors on personal life, including mental health, interpersonal relationships, careers, etc. 4 Emotions and Memory by B.F. Skinner (1943): This article introduced the influence of emotional factors on memory. It believes that emotions can affect the accuracy and durability of memory. 5 The Emotions and Success: A Guide for Entrepreneurs by Business Emotions a company dedicated to the study of emotions and business (2018): This article provides advice for successful entrepreneurs on how to manage emotional factors and how to better use emotional factors to promote success.

Alright, I can provide you with some counter-questions. 1. If the sequels change the original core elements of a successful work, such as the plot, characters, or worldview, should these changes be accepted? If you have to accept changes, will these changes destroy the unique charm and value of a successful work? Does making two sequels mean disrespect to the previous work? If so, would this disrespect lead to misunderstanding and destruction of the previous work? Would a 3-star sequela lead to the commodification of the work and maximize the benefits? If so, would the real value of the work be weakened due to this kind of commerce and profit? Would four sequels lead to a time limit and limited creative space? If so, would this restriction lead to a decline in the quality of the work? Will the sequels cause the fan base of the work to split and lose? If so, would this division and loss lead to the true value of the work being weakened? I hope these questions will help you better understand the opposing side's point of view. Now, we can start a free debate. Please raise your views and questions.

Bread and love was a common choice in life. The positive side believes that bread is more important than love because bread is the basic need for our survival while love requires constant investment and management. The following is the summary of the second debate: Bread was a basic requirement for survival. Human society was built on food and housing. We can't live without bread. In modern society, bread has become an indispensable food in our daily lives. Therefore, we must acknowledge the importance of bread. Love requires constant investment and management. Love was not only a feeling, but also a kind of responsibility and sacrifice. In real life, we can see many love stories in which both parties have to put in a lot of effort and investment to maintain this love. But if there was only love without bread, this kind of love would be difficult to last. Bread is more practical than love. When we need to meet our basic needs, bread is more practical than love. We can use bread to pay for necessities such as water, electricity, gas and so on. Love, on the other hand, required constant investment and management, which was not an easy thing in real life. Bread can help us pursue higher goals. When we have bread, we can choose to pursue more noble goals such as learning, career, travel and so on. These activities can help us realize our self-worth and also give us more choices. To sum up, bread was more important than love. We need to satisfy our basic survival needs before we can think of higher goals. Of course, this does not mean that love is not important. On the contrary, love plays an important role in our lives. However, bread was more important than the basic needs of survival.

First of all, we need to make it clear that the purpose of the debate is not to refute the other party's point of view, but to convince the other party to accept our point of view. Therefore, before refuting the other party's point of view, we need to think about how to better express our point of view. If the other party thinks that jokes do more harm than good to the spread of history, we can refute it from the following aspects: Jokes could allow people to understand history more deeply. Joking not only allowed people to understand the background and details of historical events, but also allowed people to understand the views and attitudes of different figures in historical events, so as to better understand the evolution of historical figures and historical events. Joking could improve people's cultural quality. History is an important part of culture, and jokes can be used as an interesting form of cultural expression to let people better understand and understand history and culture. Jokes could enrich people's entertainment life. Although historical events were important, they were often boring. Joking could be used as a form of entertainment to let people understand historical events in a relaxed atmosphere and improve their quality of life. To sum up, we can come to the conclusion that although the joke may bring some negative effects, it plays an important role in the popularity of history. It can make people have a deeper understanding of history, improve cultural quality and enrich their entertainment life. Therefore, I think the joke has more disadvantages than advantages for the popularity of history.

An example of the pros and cons of the Internet is as follows: Dear judges and dear audience, As an important part of modern society, the Internet has deeply changed our way of life. The Internet has brought us convenience, allowing us to access information, learn knowledge, communicate with others, socialize, and even engage in entertainment. At the same time, the Internet has also brought many negative effects, such as network security problems, information leakage, addiction to the Internet, and so on. The convenience of the Internet was obvious. We can easily access all kinds of information, learn new knowledge, and understand the development of the world through the Internet. With the help of the Internet, we can communicate with friends and family more quickly and improve our relationship. The Internet has also brought a lot of fun to our lives. For example, we can buy goods online and enjoy the convenience and fun of online shopping. However, there were also some negative effects of the Internet. The convenience of the Internet made it easy for people to be addicted to it, leading to information leakage and network security issues. Our personal information is easy to be stolen by criminals and even suffer from online fraud and other dangers. The Internet could also cause people to lack the ability to think independently and be easily influenced and guided by others, thus leading them to deviate from the right path. In addition, the internet can also lead to social isolation and loneliness because many people may not be able to find like-minded friends in real life. To sum up, the network had both advantages and disadvantages. We should be aware of the risks and problems of the internet and take measures to reduce its negative effects. We need to strengthen the management and supervision of the network to ensure the security and stability of the network. We also need more education and publicity to let the public understand the benefits and risks of the Internet and to raise people's safety awareness and defense capabilities. The pros and cons of the internet were inevitable. We should make use of the advantages of the network and take effective measures to reduce its negative effects. The development of the Internet should be centered on the interests of the people and make the Internet a useful tool in our daily lives.

Alright, let's start the debate. Prosperity is more conducive to achieving our ideals because prosperity can provide us with more opportunities and conditions to achieve our ideals. In good times, we have more resources and conditions to support our work, and it is easier for us to get the support and recognition of others. Prosperity can also make us more confident and confident in pursuing our ideals because we know that we have enough resources and conditions to realize them. On the contrary, adversity is more conducive to the realization of ideals because it will bring us more challenges and difficulties. We need to spend more time and energy to overcome these difficulties. In adversity, we may feel lost, depressed, and helpless, but these emotions can help us pursue our ideals more firmly. Adversity can also make us more mature and wiser because we have to grow through struggle and challenge. The process of realizing one's ideals in reality often involved the alternating between good and bad. We need to work hard in favorable circumstances and strengthen our beliefs in adversity. Only in this way can we overcome all difficulties and realize our ideals.