Celebrating the past few years, iQiYi advanced broadcast

During the broadcast of Joy of Life, iQIYI launched a "pay-to-view" service, which was considered to have violated the rights of Gold VIP members. The Beijing Internet Court confirmed in the first-instance judgment that some of the contract terms of iQiyi were invalid, and requested iQiyi to provide the original membership rights and interests to the plaintiff, and compensate the loss of 1500 yuan in the notary fee. The court held that although iQiyi could change the terms of the contract according to its own operating strategy, it should not harm the rights and interests of users. The judgment of this case showed that the healthy development and operation of the business model should follow the commercial terms and respect the user's feelings, and did not violate the relevant laws and regulations.

The Beijing Internet Court conducted a first-instance trial of iQiyi's Joy of Life advance broadcast case and pronounced it in court. The court found that part of iQiyi's iQiyi VIP Member Service Agreement was invalid, and the advance broadcast constituted a breach of contract. iQiyi was required to provide the plaintiff with VIP membership rights for 15 consecutive days and compensate the plaintiff for the loss of 1500 yuan in notary fees. As a Gold VIP member, Mr. Wu felt that his rights had been violated and sued iQiyi. iQiyi's advanced on-demand mode meant that VIP members could watch the series in advance, but they had to pay an additional fee. The court held that the advanced video-on-demand model itself was not inappropriate, but it should not damage the existing rights and interests of the members. Part of the content in iQiyi's VIP membership agreement excluded the user's main rights and failed to fulfill the reasonable obligation to inform, so it was deemed invalid. Overall, iQiyi's advanced on-demand mode was deemed a breach of contract, but the advanced on-demand mode itself was fine.

The iQiyi company's implementation of the "pay-to-view" method for dramas such as Joy of Life on the iQiyi platform it operated was considered to have violated the legal rights of Gold VIP members. The Beijing Internet Court ruled that "advanced on-demand" should not damage the existing rights and interests of members, and declared some of iQiyi's format clauses invalid. The court requested iQiyi to provide the original membership rights and interests to the plaintiff and compensate the plaintiff for the loss of 1500 yuan in notaries. The Plaintiff believed that the "paid advance on-demand" model violated the rights and interests of the Golden VIP members. This ruling was considered to limit iQiyi's "advanced on-demand" mode.

On the iQiyi platform operated by iQiyi, the company implemented an "advanced on-demand" method for dramas such as "Celebrating Years". This mode meant that users had to pay an additional fee to watch the follow-up content of the series in advance. However, a Gold VIP member felt that this was a violation of his legal rights and took iQiyi to court. The Beijing Internet Court found in the first-instance judgment that iQiyi's "advanced on-demand" had damaged the existing rights and interests of its members. The court pointed out that the development of the business model should follow the commercial terms, respect the user's feelings, and not violate the relevant laws and regulations. The court also found that some of iQiyi's standard terms were invalid. According to the judgment, iQiyi Company needed to provide the original gold VIP membership rights and interests to the plaintiff and compensate the plaintiff for the loss of 1500 yuan in the notary fee.

iQiyi launched Joy of Life's "advanced on-demand" service on its iQiyi platform, which meant that VIP members had to pay an additional fee to watch the series in advance. However, the Beijing Internet Court held that this behavior violated the rights of the Golden VIP members and damaged their viewing experience and satisfaction. The court ruled that iQiyi had breached the contract and demanded compensation of 1500 yuan. The case sparked widespread discussion, and many people expressed dissatisfaction with this "advanced on-demand" model. In general, iQiyi's "advanced on-demand" approach was deemed illegal and harmed the rights and interests of users.

iQiyi launched an "advanced on-demand" service during the broadcast of the TV series "Joy of Life." This service meant that VIP members could watch the series in advance, but they had to pay an additional fee. However, a Gold VIP member felt that this was a violation of his rights and took iQiyi to court. The Beijing Internet Court ruled that iQiyi's actions had damaged the rights and interests of Gold VIP members and violated the terms of the contract. The court ordered iQiyi to provide the original membership rights to the plaintiff and compensate the plaintiff. The ruling attracted widespread attention, but it was unclear whether Chu iQiyi would appeal.

During the broadcast of Joy of Life, iQiyi launched an "advanced on-demand" service, requiring members to pay an additional fee to watch the series in advance. However, a Gold VIP member felt that this violated his legal rights and took iQiyi to court. After hearing the case, the Beijing Internet Court ruled that some of iQiyi's format clauses were invalid, and the advanced on-demand clause was invalid for the plaintiff. The court ordered iQiyi to continue to provide the original membership rights and interests to the plaintiff and compensate the plaintiff for the loss of 1500 yuan in the notary fee. This ruling meant that iQiyi's advanced on-demand service was found to be in breach of contract in this case.

iQiyi launched an advanced on-demand service for Joy of Life on its iQiyi platform, which meant that users could watch the series in advance, but they had to pay an additional fee. However, a Gold VIP member felt that this method violated his legal rights and took iQiyi to court. In the first instance, the Beijing Internet Court found that iQiyi's advanced on-demand service constituted a breach of contract, and ruled that iQiyi provided the original membership rights and interests to the plaintiff and compensated the loss of 1500 yuan in notaries. The court held that the healthy development of the business model should follow the commercial terms and respect the user's feelings, and did not violate the relevant laws and regulations. The case has sparked widespread controversy, but it's not clear whether iQiyi will appeal.

iQiyi launched Joy of Life's "advanced on-demand" service on its iQiyi platform, which meant that users could watch the series in advance, but they had to pay an additional fee. However, the Beijing Internet Court ruled that this "advanced on-demand" mode violated the rights and interests of Golden VIP members and damaged their viewing experience and satisfaction. The court held that the healthy development of the business model should be based on compliance with business terms, respect for the user's feelings, and not violate the relevant laws and regulations. Therefore, the court ruled that iQiyi Company had to provide the original VIP membership rights and interests to the plaintiff for 15 consecutive days and compensate the plaintiff for the loss of 1500 yuan in notary fees. This ruling was aimed at protecting the rights and interests of consumers while balancing the healthy development of Internet companies.

On the iQiyi platform operated by iQiyi, the company implemented a "pay-to-view" approach for dramas such as Joy of Life. However, a Gold VIP member felt that this model violated his legal rights and took iQiyi to court. In the first trial, the Beijing Internet Court determined that "advanced on-demand" should not harm the existing rights and interests of members. The court also pointed out that some of the format clauses in iQiyi's VIP membership agreement were invalid. According to the judgment, iQiyi Company needed to provide the original gold VIP membership rights and interests to the plaintiff for 15 consecutive days and compensate the plaintiff for the loss of 1500 yuan in notary fees. This ruling was considered a ruling on the breach of contract of iQiyi's "advanced on-demand" model.