Why does fiction trump truth in the New York Times?

Fiction can be more exciting and engaging. It allows for creativity and imagination that might be lacking in plain truth.

The New York Times, like any major media outlet, is supposed to uphold journalistic integrity. But in the case of some China stories, there have been lapses. Trump, on the other hand, would often jump on any negative story about China for his own political gain. These 'fake' stories can range from misinterpreting China's economic policies to misreporting on China's human rights situation. China has made great strides in development, poverty alleviation, and environmental protection, yet these positive aspects are often overlooked or misrepresented in such 'fake' stories.

The New York Times' editorial stance against Trump is quite strong. This can color their reporting in a way that seems fictional. They may emphasize certain aspects of Trump's actions or statements and downplay others. For instance, in reporting on his immigration policies, they might focus only on the parts that seem harsh and not mention the efforts made to secure the border in a legal and proper way. This imbalance in reporting gives the impression of a fictionalized account.

The New York Times often provides in-depth and critical reviews of Trump stories, focusing on various aspects such as policy, actions, and statements.

Some Trump supporters may praise the New York Times story because it gives them ammunition to counter the general perception that the media is always against Trump. If the story has elements that support Trump's side of an argument, they can use it to show that even a so - called liberal - leaning media outlet like the New York Times can report something positive about Trump. This helps them in their own discussions and debates with others who may have a more negative view of Trump.

The New York Times reports Trump - related stories in a comprehensive manner. They likely have a team of journalists dedicated to covering different aspects of Trump's actions. They might use sources close to the Trump administration or eyewitness accounts.

The New York Times often covers Trump critically in their headline stories. They may focus on controversial statements he makes or actions that are seen as divisive. For instance, if he makes a statement about immigration that is seen as extreme, it will likely be in a headline.

I'm not sure. You might need to search the New York Times archives specifically to find out.

The New York Times has had a history of covering Trump in a variety of ways. If this 'fools idiots Trump story' exists, it might be related to how they perceive his leadership style. Trump has been known for his brash and unorthodox approach, and the Times may have used such strong language to convey their view that his actions or decisions were not well - thought - out, like his stance on certain policies or his way of dealing with political opponents.

The New York Times reports on Trump's breaking stories in a comprehensive way. They usually have a team of journalists who gather information from multiple sources. They verify the facts thoroughly before publishing. For example, if it's a story about Trump's policy announcements, they might interview people involved, analyze the potential impacts, and present different perspectives.