What does '13 sides to every story' mean?

It usually means that for any story, there are three perspectives: the teller's, the listener's, and the objective truth that might be different from both.

It means that in any situation or event, there are typically three different perspectives. For example, in a conflict between two people, there's the side of person A, the side of person B, and then there's an objective or outside view that might consider factors neither of them initially thought about.

Basically, it suggests that when something happens, there's more than one way to understand or explain it. For example, in a conflict, each person involved might have their own reasons and views, and both could have some validity.

Well, 'three sides to every story' implies that there's not just one way to view a situation. There's the perspective of the person involved, the perspective of the person observing, and a more balanced or objective view that takes into account different factors and viewpoints. It encourages us to think more deeply and consider all possible sides.

Well, 'two sides to every story' implies that there's not just one single truth or view. For instance, in an argument, both sides might have valid points and reasons for their positions. It reminds us to consider multiple viewpoints before forming an opinion.

It implies that every story has multiple viewpoints. Say you have a dispute - the person who started it might see it one way, the person they were in the dispute with might see it differently, and then there could be a view from someone who wasn't directly involved but has an opinion based on what they saw or heard.

Well, it means that every story has more than just two sides. Usually we think of two sides like right and wrong, but there's often a third extreme side that might be unexpected or overlooked. For example, in a dispute between two neighbors, one side might seem right, the other wrong, but there could be a third aspect like an external factor affecting them both that changes the whole perspective.

Well, '2 sides to every story' implies that we should not be too quick to judge. Just like in a courtroom, the prosecution and the defense present different sides. One side might seem right at first, but when you hear the other side, things become more complex. So, it encourages us to look at all aspects before making a conclusion.

It means that in any situation or story, there are more than just two sides (like the common 'two sides to a story'). There's often a third perspective that might be overlooked, perhaps a neutral view or a view that combines elements of the other two.

In my understanding, 'extreme three sides to every story' suggests that for any given story, there are three sides that are highly significant or extreme in some way. Take a political event for instance. There are the political parties involved, which represent two sides. But then there's also the public's perception, which can be a third side that is extreme in terms of its influence on the event. The public might have extreme reactions, which can change the course of the political event. And these three sides together form a more complete view of the story.