It's not a true story. 'After the Wedding' is a work of fiction that likely drew inspiration from various ideas and concepts but is not based on real events or people.
Definitely not. 'After the Wedding' is a made-up tale. It might incorporate elements that feel real, but it's not an account of actual happenings.
Definitely not. 'After the Wedding' is a purely fictional work. The story was crafted to engage and captivate the audience rather than being rooted in real events.
I don't know. It could be a mix of real and made-up. Maybe check the credits or reviews to get a better idea.
I think it's not a true story. It seems more like a fictional plot.
The Wedding Singer is purely fictional. The plot and characters were invented by the writers to bring a charming and humorous story to the screen. There's no real-life basis for it.
Wedding Crashers is purely a work of fiction. It was created by screenwriters and not based on any real events or people.
No, it's not based on a true story. It's likely a fictional creation by the author's imagination.
I'm not sure specifically what the 'Wedding 93 True Story' is about as the name is rather ambiguous. It could be a story related to a wedding that took place in 1993. Maybe it's about a particular couple's wedding experience, like how they met, the challenges they faced during the wedding preparations, or some unique events that happened on their big day.
One possible motive could be financial gain. Maybe he was in debt and thought he could get her money through her death. Another could be that he had a secret life or another relationship he wanted to protect.
Well, it depends on the source and details of the story. If it comes from reliable witnesses or official records, it might be true. But without that, it's hard to tell.
Muriel's Wedding is not based on a true story. It's a work of imagination by the filmmakers and writers to present a compelling and fictional narrative to the audience.