He may have used the quality of the writing style. If a novel had a beautiful, engaging, and precise writing style, it would likely be ranked well. For instance, a novel with vivid descriptions and well - crafted sentences. Also, the exploration of deep and complex themes was probably important to him. Novels that delved into topics like love, death, and the human condition in a profound way would be in his good graces.
One criterion could be the originality of the plot. Nabokov might have ranked novels higher if they had a unique and unexpected storyline.
Nabokov likely ranked great novels based on their literary craftsmanship. He was known for his attention to detail in writing, so he would have looked for the same in other works. For example, the use of language, such as rich vocabulary and unique sentence structures.
Nabokov was a complex and erudite writer. When it comes to ranking great novels, he probably considered multiple aspects. He was interested in the author's control over the medium, how the story was told rather than just what was told. Novels that had a distinct voice and a certain level of intellectual stimulation would likely be ranked well by him. His own works, such as 'Lolita', showed his penchant for exploring the darker and more complex aspects of human nature. So, he may have looked for similar qualities in other great novels. He might also have considered how a novel endured over time, its cultural significance, and how it contributed to the evolution of the literary form.
Some of the novels that Nabokov highly regarded might include 'Lolita'. It's a well - known and controversial work. The complex narrative and the exploration of the protagonist's psyche made it stand out in his view.
Poe typically focused on elements like plot consistency, character development, and the use of language and imagery to review a short story.
Literary magazines consider multiple criteria for ranking fiction. One is the voice of the narrator. A distinct and engaging narrator's voice can make a story stand out. Another is the pacing. A story with good pacing, neither too slow nor too rushed, is more likely to be ranked favorably. They also look at how well the story adheres to the genre's conventions while still bringing something new.
Nabokov wrote quite a few novels. But the exact number depends on how you classify some of his works. It's around 20 or so.
One characteristic is his unique exploration of human nature. Nabokov delves deep into the minds of his characters, often revealing their obsessions, desires, and insecurities. His characters are complex and multi - dimensional. Also, his settings are often carefully crafted, whether it's the European landscapes or the American backdrops in some of his works.
One of the best Nabokov novels is 'Lolita'. It's a controversial yet masterfully written work. Nabokov's prose in this novel is rich and detailed, exploring complex themes of love, obsession, and the loss of innocence. Another great one is 'Pale Fire'. It has a unique structure with a poem and a commentary that intertwine in an interesting way, showing Nabokov's creativity.
Nabokov was known for writing various types of fiction, including novels like 'Lolita' that are often characterized by complex language and psychological depth.
There are several criteria that could be used. Firstly, raw physical strength. Characters like the Hulk, who can lift extremely heavy objects, would score high on this. Secondly, the range of their abilities. A character like Doctor Strange, who can manipulate time and space with his magic, has a wide range of abilities. Thirdly, their durability. If a character can withstand attacks from powerful weapons or other strong characters, it helps their ranking. And finally, their influence on the fictional world they inhabit. A character who is feared and respected by many others in their world is likely to be considered strong.