This statement is rather unclear and strange on its face. It could potentially be a very odd or made - up scenario where a father is somehow involved in selling stories related to his son's homosexuality, but without more context it's hard to be certain.
Perhaps in some extremely convoluted fictional world, the 'dad' is exploiting his son's identity or experiences related to being gay by'selling' stories. But this is all speculation as the statement is so out - of - the - ordinary. It could also be a miscommunication or a very idiosyncratic way of expressing a complex family dynamic involving acceptance or non - acceptance of the son's sexual orientation.
It's a rather strange statement. It could potentially mean that a father is selling stories related to his son's homosexuality, but without more context, it's very ambiguous.
No. This statement is inappropriate. It seems to be objectifying someone's sexual orientation and potentially invading someone's privacy in a very strange way. Selling stories about someone's sexual orientation, especially within a family context, goes against basic respect and ethics.
No. Selling someone else's personal stories, especially ones related to their sexual orientation, is highly unethical. A son's sexual identity is a very private matter, and for a father to profit from it in any way is wrong.
A gay dad and his son had a story of traveling together. The dad was a travel writer. He took his son on various adventures around the world. Through these travels, the son learned about different cultures, and they also grew closer as a family. The son saw his dad as not just a parent, but also as a best friend who shared amazing experiences with him.
Well, 'gay dad' is a term for a male parent who is homosexual. 'Corrupted story' could mean a narrative that has been tampered with or misrepresented. Maybe it's a story about a gay dad that has been changed to spread false ideas, like stereotypes or false accusations. For example, someone might create a false story about a gay dad being a bad influence on his children just because of his sexual orientation, which would be a corrupted story.
Another interpretation could be that he is selling fictional stories that are inspired by his wife. For example, he might be a writer and his wife is the muse for his fictional tales, which he then sells in the market.
In most literature, this is an extremely rare and unethical scenario. While there may be some dark and disturbing fictional works that touch on such themes, it is not a common or acceptable situation in mainstream literature. The idea of a father selling his son to strangers, especially in a 'gay' context which may imply inappropriate motives, goes against basic moral and ethical values.
I have no idea what that phrase means. It seems quite confusing and maybe not a common expression.
It could be a very strange or creative statement. Maybe it implies that in some fictional or fan - created scenario, Dumbledore is involved in selling fanfiction related to Harry. But in the original 'Harry Potter' universe, this is completely uncanonical.
It could mean that the wife is involved in telling or perhaps creating stories related to her son's friends. Maybe she's a storyteller at heart and likes to share fictional or real - life anecdotes about the kids her son hangs out with.