What does 'times is tough in musky holler story' mean?

The times in Musky Holler comic are really challenging. There are various hardships and difficulties faced by the characters.

Sure. In the Musky Holler story, there could be a drought. The farmers in Musky Holler rely on their crops for income and food. But because of the drought, the crops are failing. This means they can't sell their produce, and they don't have enough to eat. It's a clear example of how times are tough in Musky Holler.

I didn't find any relevant information, so I don't know who Audrey Hall is. Hurry up and click on the link below to return to the super classic " Lord of Mysteries "!

The 'tin can holler story' might be a story where a tin can plays a significant role in communication. It could be set in a time when other means of communication were scarce. For example, in a small rural village, children might have used tin cans attached to strings to 'holler' or talk to each other across yards or fields. This simple device could have been the start of an interesting story about friendship, mischief, or discovery.

Well, 'ny times drops memo story' might imply that the New York Times has chosen to let go of a story centered around a memo. There could be various reasons for this. It could be due to legal concerns. For example, if the memo was part of a legal case and there were restrictions on its publication. Or it could be because new information came to light that made the original angle of the story no longer viable. Another possibility is that there were internal editorial disputes regarding how to present the story based on the memo.

It could mean that The New York Times has made alterations to a news article or narrative they were previously reporting. Maybe new information came to light, or they had to correct some inaccuracies in the original story.

It could imply that the 'new times' (perhaps a publication, organization or a new era in general) supports or adheres to the story related to Spencer. But without more context, it's hard to be very specific.

It could mean that in the new era, a certain entity (maybe a media or a group) supports or upholds the story related to Spencer. However, without more context, it's hard to be more specific.

It means the NY Times made a significant mistake in handling the Kavanaugh story. Maybe they misreported facts, or didn't do proper research before publishing, which led to inaccurate or unfair coverage.

It means the New York Times had to take back or withdraw the story related to Sicknick. Maybe they found out that the information in the story was inaccurate, untrue, or couldn't be verified.